View Single Post
Old 07-12-2010, 01:29 PM   #77
tompe
Grand Sorcerer
tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,452
Karma: 7185064
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Linköpng, Sweden
Device: Kindle Voyage, Nexus 5, Kindle PW
Quote:
Originally Posted by nekokami View Post
There's a big difference (more than an order of magnitude) between 24 and 350. And I prefer the 5% error margin, so one would need at least 500 participants to design a study, even using these guidelines.

The other problem with these guidelines is that they don't take the complexity of the sample into account.
Yes, of course. But depending on what you are studying and the result a smaller sample size can give statistical significant result. I read the comments about sample size in this thread as a disbelief that a small sample size ever could be statistical significant. And since that is a common error to believe that I just wanted to point that out.
tompe is offline   Reply With Quote