Quote:
Originally Posted by yvanleterrible
I'd like to point something out. (pun intended with my previous post) The actual logo failed survival because of its physical link with technology. We are writing of things happening in a new, active, quickly evolving field. There is no telling where it will be in the next five years. Ergo our update of the logo should be thought out to survive trends. Hey! We might have to deal with holographic screens sooner than we think!
aapezzuto's play with fonts is a more appropriate approach and my main reason, at the risk of repeating myself, to use a faceless reading device... if we go graphic.
A 'forum' based on reading devices should have a logo representing it with words even if it seems retro. But we also deal with futurology and change which we are fierce defenders of. We must find novel ways of expressing them befitting of the mediae we use.
|
Awful opinionated for a mime, aren't you?
