View Single Post
Old 07-11-2010, 12:19 PM   #22
DMcCunney
New York Editor
DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DMcCunney's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,384
Karma: 16540415
Join Date: Aug 2007
Device: PalmTX, Pocket eDGe, Alcatel Fierce 4, RCA Viking Pro 10, Nexus 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
I only know one other person personally who reads fiction for pleasure. The rest of my friends literally never read novels. They do read magazines, but not novels. I'd very much say that novel reading is a minority interest amongst adults.
I'd be interested in their TV viewing habits.

Reading competes for a reader's discretionary time. It's by nature a foreground visual activity you must actively concentrate on. Listening to music can be a background task done at the same time as other things, but not reading.

So the question for reading is what else the reader might be doing instead, and the main alternative will be TV. I suspect a lot of folks who do read any significant number of books read mainly non-fiction, and scratch the fiction itch with television instead of books.
______
Dennis
DMcCunney is offline   Reply With Quote