View Single Post
Old 07-11-2010, 08:31 AM   #8
pwjone1
Bookie
pwjone1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwjone1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwjone1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwjone1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwjone1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwjone1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwjone1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwjone1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwjone1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwjone1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwjone1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
pwjone1's Avatar
 
Posts: 110
Karma: 702568
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY
Device: none
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowl View Post
I think HTC probably underestimated both demand and samsung's eagerness for the mobile market.

As far as them using a competitor's product, samsung's own phones are mostly using the better super amoled screens so it would actually be in samsung's interest to sell a lesser version to htc as it would put their own models in a better light while making more profits for their screen division.

One thing I have never really got with most of these screens is what is the big deal with the ever higher resolution on these relatively small screens, it seems like a waste of battery life for nominal gain since there are limits to the size people will want things like text anyway.
As someone that has had both low and medium res smartphone screens, I can definitively say there's a world of difference, it's much more significant than one would guess until having used each for a while. And while there may be different power consumptions between different technologies, for a given technology, there's probably not a huge difference in power for different pixel counts, probably more a function of screen size and output brightness.
pwjone1 is offline   Reply With Quote