Quote:
Originally Posted by NatCh
Sounds like JSWolf just did a trial run, and wasn't impressed enough with it to do a full-up review.  |
I think a review should have a more detailed log? and maybe less biases towards it before testing it?
"I'm testing it now in a really bad situation and seeing how it functions. I have no hope for it to get it right or even close."
Anf of course testing should be made in different case scenarios, not only in the "worst really messed up" scenario?
hehe It's like testing the new jaguar for collision resistance and the test consisting in dropping it from an airplane at 35,000 ft.
and sure kovidgoyal, different tests using different applications will build a more objective review. Maybe if JSWolf doesn't have the time to do it, somebody else could request the company a trial version for review purposes, or has anyone already?
