MobileRead Forums

MobileRead Forums (https://www.mobileread.com/forums/index.php)
-   Book Clubs (https://www.mobileread.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=245)
-   -   MobileRead Discussion: Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell (spoiliers) (https://www.mobileread.com/forums/showthread.php?t=54314)

lilac_jive 09-03-2009 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BenG (Post 579479)

That is good :D

kennyc 09-03-2009 10:12 PM

Hey I just checked this out from the local library as my first e-checkout. :)

kennyc 09-03-2009 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lilac_jive (Post 579488)
That is good :D

WRT your sig. Are you reading them in order of the list? And where did the list come from? Curious? I've been working on the 100 best Novels of all time as per this:

http://www.randomhouse.com/modernlib...estnovels.html

Pablo 09-04-2009 11:54 AM

I first heard of 1984 and Orwell when I was 18, in my English class (I live in Argentina). A lesson reproduced the start of the first chapter of 1984. I found it fascinating, and some years later I read the novel in spanish. The translation was very poor (but how can you translate the "newspeak" parts and appendice?). I re-read 1984 in english (got it from PG Australia) recently.
I consider 1984 one of the best novels ever written. I don't understand why it is classified as "Science Fiction", though.

kennyc 09-04-2009 12:09 PM

Pablo there is often a blurring in SF, Fantasy, Magic, etc.

Because it is speculative and based on non-real scenarios, technology, etc. it is considered SF. :)

Pablo 09-04-2009 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kennyc (Post 580416)
Pablo there is often a blurring in SF, Fantasy, Magic, etc.

Because it is speculative and based on non-real scenarios, technology, etc. it is considered SF. :)

So is "Atlas Shrugged" by Ayn Rand also considered SF?

kennyc 09-04-2009 02:01 PM

Some might I suppose. It fits a bit like "alternate history"

Generally to be SF or Fantasy or Speculative fiction there must be some component, technology, or something that is not "real" in everyday life. I think in Atlas shrugged it was all "real" just with secret plans societies etc. (I've not actually read it). In 1984 the first unreal thing is the two-way viewscreens that big brother uses - something that was certainly speculative at the time it was written.

Pablo 09-04-2009 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kennyc (Post 580588)
Some might I suppose. It fits a bit like "alternate history"

Generally to be SF or Fantasy or Speculative fiction there must be some component, technology, or something that is not "real" in everyday life. I think in Atlas shrugged it was all "real" just with secret plans societies etc. (I've not actually read it). In 1984 the first unreal thing is the two-way viewscreens that big brother uses - something that was certainly speculative at the time it was written.

Well, in "Atlas Shrugged" there's an engine that works with static electricity from the atmosphere, an ultrasonic massive destruction weapon, a metal alloy that cointains iron and copper that is lighter and stronger than steel and a calendar in the sky, to name some.

kennyc 09-04-2009 02:21 PM

then yeah, science fiction in my definition. :)

Diego Rimar 09-07-2009 04:41 AM

Hello there,
This is my first post, sorry for inconveniences of bad redaction
I thinking this morning while take subway that it's very easy to be free, and very difficult to know to defend freedom, Western People hate the word sacrifice, that is a gap

Sparrow 09-07-2009 05:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Diego Rimar (Post 583293)
Hello there,
This is my first post, sorry for inconveniences of bad redaction
I thinking this morning while take subway that it's very easy to be free, and very difficult to know to defend freedom, Western People hate the word sacrifice, that is a gap

I'm not sure it is easy to be free.

When they are free, people will put shackles on themselves.

GeoffC 09-07-2009 01:31 PM

I have recently re-read 1984, and began to realise what the story was about.

One thing that was never seemingly explained was the "Thought Police" and where they fitted into the 'Party', as part of or even above.

When I look around at our local city it is easy to see many parallels, not least of all the surveillance that is carried out both overtly and covertly - though we have yet to find a camera behind our TV - though one never knows whats behind the screens of some of the latest liseuses .... (especially the Kindle !)

ShortNCuddlyAm 09-07-2009 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GeoffC (Post 583779)
When I look around at our local city it is easy to see many parallels, not least of all the surveillance that is carried out both overtly and covertly

London Transport had a poster up all over the place a few years back:
http://www.wired.com/news/images/full/big_brother_f.jpg

My local underground station has in the region of 30 cctv cameras (I've only counted of the two platforms, plus the ones in the booking hall and at the bottom of the escalators and extrapolated from there) - it's not in a major crime hotspot, it's not even a major station. It sits on one line, a couple of stops up from the end. My local-to-work station (and presumably others) have been putting out announcements about how the cctv cameras are watching us for our safety. Yet the BBC had a report a couple of weeks back that said only 1 in about 1000 crimes are solved by the use of cctv, and a senior police officer (I think) commented recently that there are too many cctv cameras for the amount of trained staff (he was suggesting that there should be more trained staff though, not less cctv cameras :( )

bill_mchale 09-08-2009 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pablo (Post 580386)
I first heard of 1984 and Orwell when I was 18, in my English class (I live in Argentina). A lesson reproduced the start of the first chapter of 1984. I found it fascinating, and some years later I read the novel in spanish. The translation was very poor (but how can you translate the "newspeak" parts and appendice?). I re-read 1984 in english (got it from PG Australia) recently.
I consider 1984 one of the best novels ever written. I don't understand why it is classified as "Science Fiction", though.

Others have addressed this somewhat, but I think their answers don't cover why the novel should be considered Science Fiction.

Science Fiction, unlike some other genres tends to have many potential conventions but few if any mandatory ones. That being said, 1984 includes many of the genre conventions that are common in Science Fiction Literature.

1. From the date of publication, the novel takes place in the future.
2. Not yet invented technology is integral to the plot.
3. It portrays a society that the Author believes could develop from an existing society.

--
Bill

bill_mchale 09-08-2009 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GeoffC (Post 583779)
I have recently re-read 1984, and began to realise what the story was about.

One thing that was never seemingly explained was the "Thought Police" and where they fitted into the 'Party', as part of or even above.

I always figured that the Thought Police's role was to serve as the watch dogs of the inner party and as instruments through which the inner party exercised its power over the outer party. I think the novel is clear enough that the inner party is in the highest position in society.

--
Bill


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:42 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 3.8.5, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
MobileRead.com is a privately owned, operated and funded community.