![]() |
January 2018 Second Chance Vote
MobileRead Book Club
January 2018 VOTE *** Special thanks to Dazrin for providing the list of runner-up titles! *** Help us select the next book that the MobileRead Book Club will read for January, 2018. Book selection category for January is: Second Chance There will be no nominations this month. The way Second Chance works is that the poll will be comprised of selections that either came in second place or tied for second place during the previous 11 months. The discussion will start January 20, 2018. The poll will be open for 7 days since it's earlier than usual, in response to requests to facilitate library borrowing. If the voting results a tie, there will be a 3 day run-off poll. This is a visible poll: others can see how you voted. It is http://wtsharpe3.com/Pictures/Multiple-Choice_C3.gif You may cast a vote for each book that appeals to you. Here are the selections you will be considering: 2017 runner up choices: February: Mystery • Moon Over Soho (Peter Grant #2) by Ben Aaronovitch Goodreads | Overdrive Print Length: 396 pages Spoiler:
• Track of the Cat (Anna Pigeon #1) by Nevada Barr Goodreads | Amazon US / Audible / Kobo US / Overdrive Print Length: 245 pages Spoiler:
March: Patricia Clarke Memorial Library • Lardner on the Loose (collected short fiction) by Ring Lardner Kindle epub Spoiler:
• Cranford by Elizabeth Gaskell Kindle Spoiler:
• The Man of Property by John Galsworthy Kindle Audible Spoiler:
April: Award Winners (Fiction) • The Light of Day by Eric Ambler Goodreads | Amazon US / Audible Print Length: 224 pages Spoiler:
May: Science Fiction • In Times Like These: A Time Travel Adventure by Nathan van Coops Goodreads | Amazon US / Barnes & Noble / Kobo US Print Length: 384 pages Spoiler:
June: Science • Gulp: Adventures on the Alimentary Canal by Mary Roach Goodreads | Overdrive Print Length: 353 pages Spoiler:
• What If? Serious Scientific Answers to Absurd Hypothetical Questions by Randall Munroe Goodreads | Amazon US Print Length: 321 pages Spoiler:
July: Free-For-All • The Wind Up Bird Chronicle by Haruki Murakami, Jay Rubin (Translator) Goodreads | Amazon US / Overdrive / WorldCat Print Length: 607 pages Spoiler:
August: Thriller, Suspense, & Crime • The Guns of Navarone by Alistair MacLean Goodreads | Amazon UK / Amazon US Print Length: 288 pages Spoiler:
September: Classics • Whose Body? (Lord Peter Wimsey Series Book 1) by Dorothy L. Sayers Goodreads | Amazon US / Amazon UK / Audible US / Audible UK / Public Domain Print Length: 208 pages Spoiler:
October: Humor • Breakup (Kate Shugak #7) by Dana Stabenow Goodreads | Amazon UK / Amazon US / Audible UK / Audible US / Kobo UK Print Length: 260 pages Spoiler:
November: History • The End: The Defiance and Destruction of Hitler's Germany, 1944-1945 by Ian Kershaw Goodreads | Amazon US / Kobo Print Length: 596 pages Spoiler:
• The Magic City by Edith Nesbit Goodreads | Patricia Clark Memorial Library:ePub / Kindle Print Length: 212 pages Spoiler:
|
That was a short month between polls! Are we tired of voting, yet? The early poll is to give a longer lead time for books at OverDrive or other libraries, in response to requests.
We're transitioning to a new book club and there are two important changes that will affect the vote thread and they're going into effect with this poll. Please don't vote if you won't participate in the discussion. It's no secret that discussions have been anemic of late, which the new book club is intended to address. However, it seems only just that those who will discuss the book get to choose it. We welcome participation at all levels, whether it's to lurk (Hi!), to nominate, or to drop in on the discussion, but we have to ask that you refrain from voting if that will be the end of your participation. Electioneering is fine and even fun, but please keep it civil and respectful. Focus more on the positive aspects of books rather than on their perceived negatives. It's fine to reference facts such as price or length and even including comments such as, "The Club has already read a book by that author and I'd like to read something new." But please avoid disparaging a nomination and judgmental words in general. Thanks! |
There's a reason I included "The Club has already read a book by that author and I'd like to read something new," as an example of a legitimate comment. :cough cough: :D Because I really would prefer to read something by a new author. There are a lot of books out there to be read by authors we haven't tried! I may have missed one, but Sayers, Roach, Murakami, Aaronovitch and Stabenow are all repeats and while the first few might be before eveyone's time now, we read the last two within the past year. And I personally just read Cranford last May, so that also didn't make my list.
|
I voted for the books I'll read if any win.
|
I would be happy to discuss any I voted for. I didn't vote for Murakami because he is one of my favorite authors of all time and I've read all of his work. I'd be all over that discussion though, if it were to win :)
|
For reference, I'll note that books available for free are:
That's 40% of the choices and seems to me to provide a lot of options at a time when many feel strapped. :) If I missed out any, let me know and I'll add it to the list. |
Wow there are some good books in this list. Only a couple that I'm really not interested in, though none that I wouldn't read if they were the winner. There are some duplicate authors, but that doesn't bother me particularly, and there's a pretty broad range across topics, genres, and even costs. I'm going to hold off voting for a couple of days, mostly because I've been travelling for 4 days and have to turn around and leave tomorrow again. And I want to actually think about which ones I want to vote for.
|
What an interesting list. I finished up voting for five in total: Lardner because I have heard of him but never read him, Gaskell because Cranford is on my TBR so that would bump it up, Galsworthy because I haven't read him for (ahem) about 45 years, Kershaw because although a "heavy" topic it sounds fascinating, and Nesbit because it just sounds appealing.
However, as long as I can get hold of whichever book wins (I could have a problem with a couple of them in terms of availability), I am certainly committed to reading the winner, whether I voted for it or not. |
A couple of the books in this list are a bit pricey in some countries. However, if you're willing to do a bit of electronic travel, you can pretty easily avoid the geo-fencing.
|
I have "travelled" in the past, but then some sort of block seemed to be put on doing this, in Australia at least. I can certainly try it again if necessary - it might have been a temporary glitch.
|
My choices are fairly predictable for this.
Two those are free (well, in Canada, Australia and Life+50 countries, at least). Two are rip-roaring thrillers, three are mysteries, and one is, at least in part, really funny. All but one I've actually read before, and that one I've started at least twice. But I'm determined to finish it, this time with the help of a good Audible version. ETA: And yes, I'll be reading whatever wins, and joining the discussion after. |
Quote:
I suggest everyone participating in the book club read this thread. https://www.mobileread.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=291312 |
Quote:
Of the two, I think Aaronovitch is more problematic. I accept Charlie's word that Stabenow is a standalone (again, people make up their own minds about how they feel about that), but my sense is that the Aaronovitch very much isn't a standalone, which would make it a much harder read for someone who mightn't have read it when the club did. |
Quote:
Fortunately for me, this month all but one of the books fall into the first or second category this month, including those you voted for. I've read only three in the whole slate; one I voted for and two I did not, but not out of any objection to them as selections, just out of a desire for something different. |
Quote:
Anyway, doesn't look like it'll be an issue does it? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
This post by DiapDealer explains standalone and self-contained very well. Standalone is used incorrectly for this book. As for the Aaronovitch book, it was nominated because the previous month the book club read the first book in the series and that would have been a perfect time to read the second book. I am reading the second book and it does help to have read the first book. Aaronovitch does not recap. |
Quote:
As for Aaronovitch, I personally would be opposed to reading any series in sequence in the book club; I'd recommend starting a thread like the Jim Butcher thread for such discussions. It would be a long two months without a change for someone who didn't like a series and there are a lot of different books out there. But ultimately the voters/discussers get to decide. |
As I've said before, this particular Stabenow really doesn't depend on previous books, and, moreover, it's funny. Not subtle, restrained, witty funny, but laugh out loud, near slapstick, situational funny. Oh, there's certainly references to things that happened in the past, but the story (and the humour) is not dependent on anything beyond the book you're reading. And it's a good read, with lots of references to Alaskan and Indigenous culture that very much adds to the enjoyment for me. The sort of book I find myself reading paragraphs to my DW from, even though both of us have read it before.
|
Quote:
I should've know better than to use that word. He definitely doesn't provide a summary of the previous book. He does slip enough information naturally into the opening scenes so that an adept reader can figure out what's going on. But yes it's better to have read the first book first. It's also unlikely to win the vote. |
Quote:
I would not mind reading the first two books in a series. |
Quote:
|
If The Man of Property wins, I shall dig out my DVDs of the first Forsyte Saga television series, the one with Eric Porter and Kenneth More. I loved that, back in the day; I have no idea how it will hold up. I couldn't get into the 2002 series which didn't seem to me to be true to the story, but I should probably try it again if only for the production values. And then there's the movie version, That Forsyte Woman, with Greer Garson and Errol Flynn; I have only a dim memory of that but I didn't think it was very true to the text, either.
|
Yes, I have fond memories of that 1960s version of The Forsyte Saga. The more recent version was well done I thought, but I don't think it was up to the 1960s version, which had the luxury of 26 episodes I seem to remember, so the scriptwriters were able to follow the books closely.
I agree on the film - lovely though Greer Garson was, the film was pretty clunky I seem to remember. |
Quote:
|
And the winner is Whose Body?, the first in Dorothy L. Sayers's Lord Peter Wimsey Golden Age mystery series. While the mystery is fun in itself, there's also interest in the social and economic context of the times (1923).
See you on January 20 when the discussion will start. In the meantime, this thread can be used for background and other information and comments. And don't forget the discussion of Sylvie and Bruno starting December 20. |
For those who prefer audio books, there are three narrations available on Audible.com, two of them by two of my absolute favourite narrators -- David Case and Nadia May.
At Audible.co.uk, there is the Nadia May version, as well as a 'dramatized' version with Ian Carmichael (whose television versions of Lord Peter were definitive) and Patricia Rutledge. Of course, all of the Dorothy Sayers books are available in the public domain in Life+50 countries, such as Canada, where FadedPage has a special Dorothy Sayers page with proofread versions of most of her books available for the download. |
Quote:
|
It's not in my library's OD catalog, but it is in the Hoopla catalog, with 3 narrators to choose from and ebook versions as well.
I think, but I'm not certain, that all libraries that use Hoopla have access to the full catalog. |
Wow, there are 4 different audio versions and 2 different ebook versions at one of my libraries. All have wait lists. :(
I rarely listen to audiobooks unless I have a trip but I may try the David Case audio, I like Wanda McCaddon/Nadia May too but it sounds like a good opportunity to possibly add a new favorite. |
Quote:
:offtopic: You do know that David Case and Wanda McCaddon were partners in their audio work, right? Until, of course, Case died of throat cancer. Apparently Ms. McCaddon introduced him to the business. :offtopic: |
Interestingly, both the David Case and the Nadia May (Wanda McCaddon) versions are available in the BC Public Library AND NO WAITS! I think I'll grab the Nadia May one first, because I might just get the David Case one directly on Audible, given that it's on sale at 50% off right now.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Hoopla has three different audiobook versions.
1. Roe Kendall 2. Frederick Davidson 3. Nadia May |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I'm going with kindle book and audible companion with Nadia May, just to be a bit different from you David Case ones :)
|
Quote:
|
I'd agree. On any given book, I might prefer Nadia May/Donada Peters/Wanda McCaddon, but for Lord Peter Wimsey, David Case's voice is a better fit. And both are in my too 4 or 5 narrators.
|
I've completed my Audible listen to Whose Body, narrated by David Case. An excellent narration, and I look forward to the discussion. I expect to re-read the eBook before then, just to catch things I didn't catch in the Audible book.
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:53 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 3.8.5, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
MobileRead.com is a privately owned, operated and funded community.