MobileRead Forums

MobileRead Forums (https://www.mobileread.com/forums/index.php)
-   Book Clubs (https://www.mobileread.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=245)
-   -   MobileRead September 2016 Book Club Vote (https://www.mobileread.com/forums/showthread.php?t=277704)

CRussel 08-29-2016 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dazrin (Post 3380980)
Interesting vote this time. I am a little surprised to see Heart of Darkness in the lead, I haven't read it but isn't it one that many people are forced to read in school? That tends to leave a bad taste behind.

Three tied for second right now - Hiroshima (non-fiction account of the aftermath of using the bomb), 2001: A Space Odyssey (science fiction with a movie that is more well known than the book), and Captains Courageous (coming of age on the high seas) - all of which are very different from each other.

I suspect Hiroshima doesn't have more votes because of US availability, it doesn't appear to be available from the Amazon US Kindle store at least.

Yes, that might be an issue in some minds, but there IS a free version from Kobo that is available in the US. And conversion is a non-issue. Though I admit, even though it's now on my Kindle, I'm going with the Ed Asner reading.

Hamlet53 08-29-2016 02:26 PM

About availability in the US. Perhaps CRussel can confirm, but this looks to be it?

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1946/08/31/hiroshima


It's right out there on the Internet so I would assume that copying or downloading this would not be a copyright violation?

CRussel 08-29-2016 03:02 PM

Yes, that's it. And you can certainly read it directly on that site. However, Condé Nast retains copyright:

Spoiler:
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement (effective January 1, 2014) and Privacy Policy (effective January 1, 2014). Your California Privacy Rights The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Condé Nast.


Given their willingness at the time of the initial publication to allow others to reprint the article, I suspect one could get permission. But just because it's freely available doesn't mean you can reproduce it without that permission.

And really, it's easy available for free on Kobo, so why bother? (Add to Library and then it is a direct epub or pdf download, not DRM'd. )

CRussel 08-29-2016 03:11 PM

Also worthy of note on The New Yorker's web site is this more recent article -- Hiroshima and the Inheritance of Trauma, by Sarah Stillman.

Just to be clear, I'll be reading Hiroshima regardless of what we decide to do here as the MobileRead Book Club. But I would really like to have us all read and discuss it. I think it's a worthy read, it's short, it's free, and it will provide the basis for an excellent discussion, IMHO.

bfisher 08-29-2016 06:07 PM

Gene Wilder died yesterday. For me, he'll always be the definitive Willie Wonka for dramatizations of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory.

Hamlet53 08-29-2016 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CRussel (Post 3381070)
Yes, that's it. And you can certainly read it directly on that site. However, Condé Nast retains copyright:

Spoiler:
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement (effective January 1, 2014) and Privacy Policy (effective January 1, 2014). Your California Privacy Rights The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Condé Nast.


Given their willingness at the time of the initial publication to allow others to reprint the article, I suspect one could get permission. But just because it's freely available doesn't mean you can reproduce it without that permission.

And really, it's easy available for free on Kobo, so why bother? (Add to Library and then it is a direct epub or pdf download, not DRM'd. )

To be clear I was not suggesting copying and distributing that online source, nor turning it into an ebook and adding it to the MR Library. I'm sure the moderators would stop that. I'll just use it as a source to read on my computer since it's so short and convenient. It's been a while but last time I tried getting an ebook from Kobo it was not possible to get a DRM free epub download. This was over a year ago though.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CRussel (Post 3381079)
Also worthy of note on The New Yorker's web site is this more recent article -- Hiroshima and the Inheritance of Trauma, by Sarah Stillman.

Just to be clear, I'll be reading Hiroshima regardless of what we decide to do here as the MobileRead Book Club. But I would really like to have us all read and discuss it. I think it's a worthy read, it's short, it's free, and it will provide the basis for an excellent discussion, IMHO.

I'd like to see it win for that reason as well. Even if it does not in the past with some success a separate thread to discuss an interesting book has been put up here.

issybird 08-29-2016 06:20 PM

Ever since the nominations were finalized, I've had a recurring thought. I finally googled today and found this reddit post, quite coincidentally posted exactly a year ago today.

Not just me, then.

CRussel 08-29-2016 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hamlet53 (Post 3381195)
To be clear I was not suggesting copying and distributing that online source, nor turning it into an ebook and adding it to the MR Library. I'm sure the moderators would stop that. I'll just use it as a source to read on my computer since it's so short and convenient. It's been a while but last time I tried getting an ebook from Kobo it was not possible to get a DRM free epub download. This was over a year ago though.

Fair enough, and thank you for that clarity.

As for downloading a freebie from Kobo? I just did it. I clicked on the "Download" button from the link I provided, then "View in Library", then "Return to your old library" and finally Download ePub from the dropdown list. What's downloaded is the ePub itself, not an acsm file, since Adobe isn't involved in the transaction at all. :)

CRussel 08-29-2016 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by issybird (Post 3381196)
Ever since the nominations were finalized, I've had a recurring thought. I finally googled today and found this reddit post, quite coincidentally posted exactly a year ago today.

Not just me, then.

Interesting. Which simply reinforces my opinion that if I want to read Heart of Darkness, I'll read it. Instead of a children's version.

bfisher 08-29-2016 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by issybird (Post 3381196)
Ever since the nominations were finalized, I've had a recurring thought. I finally googled today and found this reddit post, quite coincidentally posted exactly a year ago today.

Not just me, then.


Wow! :thumbsup:

JSWolf 08-29-2016 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by issybird (Post 3381196)
Ever since the nominations were finalized, I've had a recurring thought. I finally googled today and found this reddit post, quite coincidentally posted exactly a year ago today.

Not just me, then.

To be honest,that Reddit thread is pure crap. Charlie and the Chocolate Factory is a fun book to read and reading such nonsense into it is just crazy.

JSWolf 08-29-2016 11:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bfisher (Post 3381288)
Wow! :thumbsup:

Not wow but nut job conspiracy theorists who have no idea what's going on.

JSWolf 08-29-2016 11:37 PM

Everyone should vote for Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (ad no other book so it can win) for Gene Wilder.

Dazrin 08-30-2016 12:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JSWolf (Post 3381376)
Everyone should vote for Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (ad no other book so it can win) for Gene Wilder.

Ok, I voted for it.

I did vote for more than that one though. ;)

JSWolf 08-30-2016 01:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dazrin (Post 3381404)
Ok, I voted for it.

I did vote for more than that one though. ;)

The idea is to JUST vote for Charlie so it can win in honor of Gene Wilder.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:48 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 3.8.5, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
MobileRead.com is a privately owned, operated and funded community.