![]() |
Date publication for ancients books
Im make a ebook with Sigil from a ancient book, the date of publication for this book is 1552. But the most oldie date can i set, in the metadata Sigil form, is 1752.
¿why? I have a manualy fix; unzip the epub and edit the "content.opf" file the line: Code:
<dc:date opf:event="publication">1552-01-01</dc:date>
:2thumbsup |
Open an issue on the tracker. That is the best advice I can give you.
|
Quote:
|
books were published in 1552 ? - really ??
what was on the best-seller list for that year ??? |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
so is wondering what % of the population could even read in 1552 ? let alone afford to buy books :-) not your average peasant - that's for sure. |
Quote:
|
"A Short Account of the Destruction of the Indies[1] (Spanish: Brevísima relación de la destrucción de las Indias) is an account written by the Spanish Dominican friar Bartolomé de las Casas in 1542 (published in 1552) about the mistreatment of the Indigenous Peoples of the Americas in colonial times and sent to then Prince Philip II of Spain"
so number of readers = 1 ( assuming he bothered to read it) number of copies published in English - approximately zero. sorry for taking the p**s - I just don't get why being able to set the date of this book accurately in sigil matters ( to anyone but the OP ). why not just put epub version first published in 2011 |
Quote:
Am I wrong? |
Quote:
The Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (shorthand: DC, or DCMI) is a standardized method of describing metadata. In this case, there are two works that could be described by the DC data: the original and the E-Book, with the latter being a derivative work of the former. The DCMI is following a "one-to-one rule". This rule means that an any metadata should describe the object it accompanies, and just that object. A different object shall have its own metadata. The DC Usage Guide specifically notes on the created property: Quote:
So it is my interpretation of the DC standard, that an E-Book version of an old document should have a "creation" date of 2011, and a "published"/"issued" date of 2011, if it is actually published. |
Quote:
The KJV was released in 1611. see: https://www.mobileread.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=108163 Dale |
:offtopic::D:D:D
|
Quote:
the original question seemed daft but the thread did prompt me to re-check stuff like "when was the printing press invented" I hate to think of precious sigil development resource being wasted on a pre 1700 date fix though. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:52 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 3.8.5, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
MobileRead.com is a privately owned, operated and funded community.