From Kobo via the Facebook page): The eReaders Bill of Rights - Page 2

digital_steve · 09-21-2010, 06:37 PM

As far as i can see, no one was slagging KOBO regarding geographic restrictions... it's not their fault.

shall1028 · 09-21-2010, 08:30 PM

By changing the first reply post to:

Kobo could add to this list: "The right not to have ebooks you want to purchase denied to you because of geographic restrictions."

my whole misunderstanding could have been avoided.

It originally appeared that the commenter was criticizing the Kobo "Bill of Rights" for not including it. The "Kobo could add to the list" shows a commiseration with what they were intending rather than giving the appearance of negative criticism for its omission.

I should have followed my own precept to avoid replying to very short replies as the shorter the original reply the more room for misunderstanding.

digital_steve · 09-21-2010, 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shall1028

I should have followed my own precept to avoid replying to very short replies as the shorter the original reply the more room for misunderstanding.

Correct!
Have a cookie

taming · 09-21-2010, 11:13 PM

More then that have some karma.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Kobo Facebook update: Fatal Affair by Marie Force	dmacmart	Deals, Freebies, and Resources (No Self-Promotion)	11	09-01-2010 05:43 PM
calibre fan page on facebook	Krittika Goyal	Calibre	4	12-14-2009 10:03 AM
e-Book Readers Bill of Rights - a little fun	Barcey	Lounge	23	09-03-2008 03:45 PM
Bill Gates -- Supports Strong Intellectual Rights Laws	Bob Russell	Lounge	4	01-15-2005 01:58 PM

09-21-2010, 06:37 PM	#16
digital_steve Muppet Posts: 240 Karma: 442 Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Tasmania Device: iPad WiFi	As far as i can see, no one was slagging KOBO regarding geographic restrictions... it's not their fault.

09-21-2010, 08:30 PM	#17
shall1028 Zealot Posts: 144 Karma: 73978 Join Date: Jun 2010 Device: Kobo	By changing the first reply post to: Kobo could add to this list: "The right not to have ebooks you want to purchase denied to you because of geographic restrictions." my whole misunderstanding could have been avoided. It originally appeared that the commenter was criticizing the Kobo "Bill of Rights" for not including it. The "Kobo could add to the list" shows a commiseration with what they were intending rather than giving the appearance of negative criticism for its omission. I should have followed my own precept to avoid replying to very short replies as the shorter the original reply the more room for misunderstanding.

09-21-2010, 11:13 PM	#19
taming Trying for calm & polite Posts: 3,472 Karma: 8171285 Join Date: May 2010 Location: Alberta, Canada Device: kobo original, WiFI, Touch, Glo, and Aura	More then that have some karma.


Advertisement Enthusiast