Register Guidelines E-Books Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   MobileRead Forums > E-Book Formats > ePub

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-19-2010, 10:11 PM   #1
quillaja
Connoisseur
quillaja began at the beginning.
 
quillaja's Avatar
 
Posts: 79
Karma: 42
Join Date: Sep 2009
Device: sony reader touch (prs-600)
ePub 2.0.1?

I know the working group for 2.0.1 finished in April or May. Has their recommendations been accepted? Is ePub now on version 2.0.1? I can't find any information on the IDPF website to indicate or confirm this. Does anyone know?
quillaja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2010, 12:57 PM   #2
JSWolf
Resident Curmudgeon
JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
JSWolf's Avatar
 
Posts: 36,469
Karma: 17660776
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Roslindale, Massachusetts
Device: Sony Reader PRS-650, iPad, nook STR
Quote:
Originally Posted by quillaja View Post
I know the working group for 2.0.1 finished in April or May. Has their recommendations been accepted? Is ePub now on version 2.0.1? I can't find any information on the IDPF website to indicate or confirm this. Does anyone know?
Even if it was approved as the new standard for ePub, it would matter not at all. The ePub standard is only as up-to-date as the earliest version of ADE out in the wild. And that means until Sony updates ADE on the 500, 505, 300, 600, & 700, that's the version of ADE all ePub eBooks have to be compatible with. And I have no idea about other companies and their ADE versions or plans to update.
JSWolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2010, 07:47 PM   #3
quillaja
Connoisseur
quillaja began at the beginning.
 
quillaja's Avatar
 
Posts: 79
Karma: 42
Join Date: Sep 2009
Device: sony reader touch (prs-600)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSWolf View Post
Even if it was approved as the new standard for ePub, it would matter not at all. The ePub standard is only as up-to-date as the earliest version of ADE out in the wild. And that means until Sony updates ADE on the 500, 505, 300, 600, & 700, that's the version of ADE all ePub eBooks have to be compatible with. And I have no idea about other companies and their ADE versions or plans to update.
That's true, but I was interested for other reasons unrelated to ADE or actual devices. Besides, you forgot that the iPad is also now a major player, perhaps more so than ADE.

Anyway, the proposed change to 2.0.1 is just minor things and I doubt would cause any incompatibilities. The planned updates for next year to 2.1 might be another story.
quillaja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2010, 12:12 AM   #4
abdelazer
Junior Member
abdelazer began at the beginning.
 
Posts: 5
Karma: 10
Join Date: Jul 2008
Device: ePub
The updates to OPF and OPS (two parts of the three that make up the EPUB standard) for 2.0.1 were published by the IDPF on 25 May 2010 at http://www.idpf.org/specs.htm:

* http://www.idpf.org/doc_library/epub....0.1_draft.htm
* http://www.idpf.org/doc_library/epub....0.1_draft.htm

I the final versions will be published after all of the formal review hurdles have been completed, but my understanding is that there haven't been any substantive changes suggested, so they should be about the same.
abdelazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2010, 04:44 AM   #5
charleski
Wizard
charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,188
Karma: 727236
Join Date: Sep 2009
Device: PRS-505
Quote:
Originally Posted by abdelazer View Post
The updates to OPF and OPS (two parts of the three that make up the EPUB standard) for 2.0.1 were published by the IDPF on 25 May 2010 at http://www.idpf.org/specs.htm:

* http://www.idpf.org/doc_library/epub....0.1_draft.htm
* http://www.idpf.org/doc_library/epub....0.1_draft.htm

I the final versions will be published after all of the formal review hurdles have been completed, but my understanding is that there haven't been any substantive changes suggested, so they should be about the same.
Executive Summary:
The table of contents is now called a 'global navigation structure'.
And, er, that's it.
Oh, they fixed a few typos and a couple of links.

Any real changes will only happen with revision 2.1, which is due in May 2011.
charleski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2010, 06:56 AM   #6
pdurrant
The Grand Mouse
pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
pdurrant's Avatar
 
Posts: 31,167
Karma: 86241230
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: NOOK ST GlowLight
Quote:
Originally Posted by charleski View Post
Executive Summary:
The table of contents is now called a 'global navigation structure'.
And, er, that's it.
Oh, they fixed a few typos and a couple of links.

Any real changes will only happen with revision 2.1, which is due in May 2011.
There's a significant clarification in http://www.idpf.org/doc_library/epub...htm#Section3.1

New:
Quote:
This specification assumes a use of selectors that is consistent with the CSS2 Specification. Reading Systems must support all CSS2 selectors, including pseudo-elements and pseudo-classes. However, certain pseudo-classes may not be applicable to all Reading Systems (e.g. hover for devices with a touch screen) and may not result in any rendering on such devices.
Old:
Quote:
This specification assumes a use of selectors that is consistent with the CSS2 Specification. Reading Systems must support all CSS2 selectors.
(Significant clarification highlighted in red.)

So compliant renderers are required handle :first-letter, :first-line pseudo elements and the :first-child pseudo-class, among others.

This has always been the case, but some implementations have chosen to assume that it wasn't required. This clarification shows that this assumption was a mistake.
pdurrant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2010, 07:23 AM   #7
charleski
Wizard
charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,188
Karma: 727236
Join Date: Sep 2009
Device: PRS-505
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdurrant View Post
So compliant renderers are required handle :first-letter, :first-line pseudo elements and the :first-child pseudo-class, among others.
They're required to 'support' these (as in, I suppose, not crash when encountering them), but not required to cause them to alter the rendering.

...
charleski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2010, 07:41 AM   #8
pdurrant
The Grand Mouse
pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
pdurrant's Avatar
 
Posts: 31,167
Karma: 86241230
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: NOOK ST GlowLight
Quote:
Originally Posted by charleski View Post
They're required to 'support' these (as in, I suppose, not crash when encountering them), but not required to cause them to alter the rendering.

...
I disagree.

They are required to use CSS2 selectors to determine which of the style definitions in the CSS2 stylesheet to apply to a particular character or characters. They are required to support all CSS2 selectors in making this selection, including pseudo-elements. This means that if the CSS contains

p {font-weight: normal;}
p:first-letter: {font-weight: bold;}

then they are required to use font-weight:bold in the rendering of the first character in a <p> element.

Now, it may be that a particular renderer can only render one weight of font, in which case the first character will not be different from the rest of the element. But if the rendering system can make such a distinction (in particular, if it does it for other CSS2 style defintions), to be a compliant ePub renderer, it must do so in this case.

I raised this issue myself in the discussions, and this clause was put in to remove any doubt that when 'all selectors' meant all.

If you believe that yours is a valid interpretation of the 2.0.1 draft standard, please suggest a wording that would remove the ambiguity that you see.
pdurrant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2010, 02:30 PM   #9
charleski
Wizard
charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,188
Karma: 727236
Join Date: Sep 2009
Device: PRS-505
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdurrant View Post
If you believe that yours is a valid interpretation of the 2.0.1 draft standard, please suggest a wording that would remove the ambiguity that you see.
Reading Systems must support all CSS2 selectors, including pseudo-elements and pseudo-classes. Dynamic pseudo-classes are the only exception to this and may be disregarded if, and only if, they specify user activity which is not applicable to the interface being used (e.g. hover for devices with a touch screen).

As it stands, the meaning of "not applicable" is undefined and only illustrated by a single example, effectively giving the implementers a lot of lee-way to define it as they wish.
charleski is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
epub, idpf, standards, update

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
epub, ePub, EPUB, warum blos ePub? flowoeB Lounge 5 11-27-2009 09:37 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:26 PM.


MobileRead.com is a privately owned, operated and funded community.