|04-09-2010, 01:22 AM||#16|
Join Date: Sep 2009
I agree with the *stated* purpose of DRM, but that's not what it has been used for so far, and that's not what the law says, as far as I understand it. As an example, under the DMCA, it is illegal for somebody to watch a DVD on your computer if the software you use does not license the decryption software. This is particularly noticeable for people using the Linux Operating System, since, as far as I have seen, there is no legal software for decoding DVDs. A group got together and tried to get that added as an exception to the DMCA, and was unsuccessful.
|05-15-2010, 02:57 AM||#17|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Device: Blackberry, jetbook lite
I was discussing this today with someone.
Is there yet any case law about removing DRM for personal use (putting a kindle book on a nook, for example?) I know that it is considered a gray area, at least in the US, where DMCA theoretically prevents any circumvention of DRM, but copyright law allows for fair use exceptions and am curious if anyone has argued it in court.
|07-04-2010, 02:55 PM||#18|
Join Date: Jul 2010
buy acomplia online
Last edited by al3xis999; 07-14-2010 at 09:38 AM.
|07-04-2010, 04:58 PM||#19|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Device: PW2, iPad Retina Mini, iPhone 4, MS Surface Pro, Onyx T68, N7,
What is it that you don't understand?
|07-06-2010, 06:03 PM||#20|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SF Bay Area, California, USA
Device: Clié; PRS-505; EZR Pocket Pro, PRS-600, Kobo Mini
Nobody has recently gone to court for DRM-removal, so there's been no official attempts to argue that the DRM removal software had substantial non-infringing effects (like, removing DRM from public domain works).
Synopsis: LEGALLY--nobody knows. Very blurry. Consult lawyers before making statements, then consult some more lawyers, who will tell you the opposite of what the first batch of lawyers said. Copyright law is a mess on its own; laws written to support it are more of a mess, because they don't address any of the loopholes in the original.
PRACTICALLY--nobody cares if someone removes DRM in order to read their Kindle books on a Nook. Not publishers, not Adobe's software lawyers, not anti-piracy fanatics. There's occasionally discussion about how legal it is or isn't, but that's all abstract. Nobody is trying to hunt down individuals whose sole potential copyright infringement involves moving their ebooks from one virtual shelf to another, as long as the same person owns all the shelves.
HOWEVER--since the tools that can make kbooks readable on a Nook, can also make them sharable on the torrents, public help & support are very limited.
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|I got into law school!||GERGE||Lounge||18||08-15-2010 10:42 AM|
|Which one for law school?||kellemonster||Which one should I buy?||41||04-08-2010 02:08 PM|
|French Copyright Law Question||ahi||News||8||01-14-2010 03:25 PM|
|Seriously thoughtful count wolfram-alpha make copywrite laws worce||ahammer||Lounge||4||07-31-2009 01:01 PM|
|getting around copyright law||sic||Workshop||2||12-08-2006 03:56 PM|