|12-15-2005, 03:42 PM||#1|
Recovering Gadget Addict
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Device: Note3, MacBook Air
Wikipedia may be more accurate than Encyclopedia Britannica
Nature magazine has done a study on 42 "science-related" entries to compare Wikipedia and Encyclopedia Britannica, and finds that the subject matter experts found one less error per article on average in the Wikipedia articles (an average of three errors per article instead of four).
That would be bad enough publicity for Britannica, but now the results are piling on. It seems that further analysis (Item #64 if the link doesn't locate it completely for you) shows that Wikipedia articles are more than twice as long as Britannica articles. That means that the error rate for a given length of text compares even more favorably for Wikipedia.
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|DR800 How do I do 'accurate stylus calibration'?||bokjeid||iRex||18||05-06-2010 01:13 PM|
|Reference Wikipedia: SOS Children 2006 Wikipedia CD||hn_88||BBeB/LRF Books||0||01-29-2008 12:23 PM|
|Is this accurate? (Borders question)||MomAndrea||Sony Reader||8||01-22-2008 12:35 PM|
|Wikipedia Encyclopedia on your handheld||Colin Dunstan||Reading and Management||12||12-03-2007 08:45 AM|