|12-12-2005, 05:37 AM||#1|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Device: Dell Axim
Google was not interested in Project Gutenberg
On the off-chance that you haven't heard about Project Gutenberg before, it's a volunteer effort to digitize, archive, and distribute full texts of public domain books in open formats. WSJ interviewed Project Gutenberg's founder Michael Hart and reveals that he was approached by Google one year prior the official announcement of Google Book Search.
I talked to Google a year before Google's big announcement [in December 2004]. … They approached us. They sent us an email saying, "Hey, we'd like to talk to you." They let us tell them about all that we were doing. It took place at the big Google headquarters in Silicon Valley. They gave us a free lunch and everything. They were very polite, but very business-plan oriented. At a certain point, they sort of talked us out the door. So I heard about [Google Book Search] along with everybody else. Same with Yahoo.
So Google didn't want to work together with Mr. Hart. According to the latter, the search engine company decided for a different approach:
Google is working from the top down. It's very centralized. Project Gutenberg is the opposite: It's decentralized, it's grassroots. From the consumer's point of view, if you're trying to get a quotation from a book, you could get the book from Project Gutenberg and cut and paste, say, the whole "Hamlet" soliloquy. On Google, you can't. Also, ours is totally non-commercial. You won't find advertising on any of our pages.
|12-12-2005, 11:37 AM||#2|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC
Device: Kindles: KK, PW & Fire Nooks: Color & GlowLight, Libre Pro, eb1150
Interesting. I'm assuming Google's only source of revenue with the product would be targeted advertising? I mean they can't charge for access to the content I assume. So I'm not sure why they wouldn't be able to crawl the contents of the Gutenberg archive and deliver ads based on what people are reading/searching for. Just seems like a lot of duplicate effort.
I assume the grassroots nature of Gutenberg is the major reason. Less control is always a scary proposition for a business.
|12-12-2005, 12:11 PM||#3|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Device: Too many to count here.
Would be kinda hard for Google to claim its altruistic intentions if the "revenue model" of Gutenberg didn't work out for them.
|01-11-2006, 02:03 PM||#4|
Disclaimer: I am a Project Gutenberg volunteer, but I have no idea why the Google thing did not work out.
Many "open", volunteer-driven projects fail to get corporate cooperation other than some sponsorships. For PG to be interesting to Google, it should be accountable, it should be scalable, it should be many things you cannot get from PG simply because these are things you cannot ask of volunteers.
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Project Gutenberg Australia||ballast||Deals, Freebies, and Resources (No Self-Promotion)||9||07-31-2010 05:18 PM|
|Project Gutenberg||levi_john||Workshop||17||07-26-2010 07:02 PM|
|What's wrong with Project Gutenberg?||mtravellerh||News||13||04-22-2009 04:17 AM|
|Project Gutenberg on Kindle 1?||Astabeth||Amazon Kindle||25||04-04-2009 06:24 PM|
|Missing features: Gutenberg, Google Books, Google News, open RSS aggregator||Charbax||Amazon Kindle||10||11-22-2007 09:22 PM|