|04-13-2009, 12:41 PM||#1|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Device: Sony PRS-505, iPad, iPhone 4, Kindle Fire
Wall Street Journal compares Kindle to PRS700
Hopefully you can all get to the video. It's not a very good review unfortunately.
First, it calls the PRS700 "the Sony Reader", ignoring the fact that it's only one of two models sold by Sony.
Secondly, she does a drop test, but only drops one device, the Sony.
She doesn't explain anything about the formats, DRM, etc. She doesn't tell you that you can buy contemporary titles from all sorts of places besides the Sony store. Essentially, she says the Sony product is a good one in a world without the Kindle. She trumps the wireless feature as the single most important feature for a consumer.
Glad eBooks are getting the exposure, but disappointed in the lackluster review from a woman who already has a bias.
|04-14-2009, 11:18 AM||#2|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Device: Kindle Fire HD 8.9, Kindle Keyboard
I can't see the video (it's blocked by my work's filter), but I am still disappointed in the review, based on your description.
How can an editor or site director let something that biased be posted?
"The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated." ~ Mahatma Gandhi
"The worst sin towards our fellow creatures is not to hate them, but to be indifferent to them. That's the essence of inhumanity." ~George Bernard Shaw
"Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside a dog, it's too dark to read." ~Groucho Marx
|04-14-2009, 11:25 AM||#3|
I'm Super Kindle-icious
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Long Drive, Calinadia Candafornia
Device: K1, KTSO, KFHD, K3, KPW, KDXG, HP Touchpadx2
I saw the video yesterday (someone on the 700 board posted about it). It is biased toward the Kindle but it was supposedly a review comparing the two.
On the whole, I didn't think it was a very good review because she was sent the Sony to review but threw in the Kindle because a colleague mentioned she had one. That's the reason there was no drop test for the Kindle, she was using a co-workers Kindle. If she'd received one from Amazon she probably would have done the test. She did mention that someone received a Kindle with a damaged screen leading viewers to believe that the Kindle might be more delicate than the 700.
|04-14-2009, 12:00 PM||#4|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Device: Galaxy S, Nook w/CM7
I have long since disregarded any "comparison" or "Versus" reviews simply because the are almost all very biased. Anytime a reviewer is more knowledgeable in one product over another it will never get a fair review.
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Wall Street Journal NewsFeed||erichoch||General Discussions||0||08-23-2010 07:40 PM|
|Wall Street Journal||dieterpops||Sony Reader||0||12-20-2009 05:51 PM|
|Wall Street Journal still not convinced||Argel||News||28||12-02-2009 05:48 PM|
|Wall Street Journal Recipe Quality?||rhsanborn||Calibre||6||12-04-2008 11:42 PM|
|Wall Street Journal article on the Kindle and eBooks||KindleDude||News||4||12-04-2008 12:55 PM|