|07-22-2008, 04:30 AM||#1|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Device: Sony PRS-650 / Nexus 7 / Kindle PW
ALA releases flashy is-this-work-in-copyright slider
Whether a book is in the US public domain is a complex legal determination. For those in doubt, the American Library Association released a flash tool allowing you to dial up the various copyright terms for works created at different time periods and under different conditions.
Obviously, different countries impose different laws, so take this tool with a grain of salt if you're living outside the US.
[via Ars Technica]
|07-22-2008, 07:12 AM||#2|
zeldinha zippy zeldissima
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Paris, France
Device: eb1150 & is that a nook in her pocket, or she just happy to see you?
hopefully soon we will manage to simplify copyright law, so a tool like this will not be necessary. but in the meantime it could be very helpful ! thanks alex for the info !
|07-22-2008, 10:05 AM||#3|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado
Device: Thinkpad X41 & Sony Reader
Requirements of a valid copyright notice
That's a superb overview and a must-bookmark item.
There are a couple of legal subtleties that researchers (and would-be republishers) of old works need to be aware of. The most important of these is that there are requirements for a valid copyright notice. As I understand it (and I'm a publisher, not a lawyer) a copyright notice for printed works must have these three elements to qualify under the law:
Note that this is the case for printed works; requirements are looser for graphics, photographs, or sculptures, but I don't work in those fields and haven't studied them. For printed works, if any one or more of these items is missing, the copyright notice is not valid and thus not binding.
The most common failing of a copyright notice is lack of a year. "Copyright by John Q. Clueless" is not a valid notice. I have only once or twice seen an item with a notice like "Copyright 1937" but that is not sufficient under the law. I don't know whether abbreviations other than "copr." qualify, but I wouldn't choose to get in a row with Time Warner over it.
Again, all the usual IANAL cautions apply here, but this is the law as I understand it.
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|ALA Conference news||Nate the great||News||2||06-26-2010 10:58 PM|
|how can a publisher claim copyright over a public domain work?||rem736||News||6||01-28-2010 07:44 AM|
|Should Copyright Be Abolished On Academic Work?||ahi||News||10||08-03-2009 10:58 AM|
|Sony Releases Stupid Piece Of **** That Doesn't ******* Work||SpiderMatt||Lounge||0||02-15-2009 07:50 PM|
|WIPO releases child's guide to copyright law||Bob Russell||News||1||10-08-2007 06:48 PM|