|04-29-2014, 06:47 AM||#16|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Device: (Sony (J) PRS 650), Kobo Mini, Kobo Glo HD
Thank you for your input.
I'll come back to post when my ideas will be better sorted so it won't look like sentences put after sentences.
|05-01-2014, 05:41 AM||#17|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Device: Kindle 3 (wifi only) Kindle Paperwhite 2G Wi-Fi only, iPad, iPod Touch
I was unable to get the new "unexpurgated" edition and it does get quite mixed reviews. Wilde never bothered to get the original published as he could have done in his final years in France. Of course he may just have lost interest in this early work.
Since I haven't read the original I can only theorise but perhaps this may be a case where the editing of the two published versions has been of benefit. But each reader will have to decide for her/himself.
I did read both the original 13 chapter version which appeared in Lippincott's Magazine july 1890 and the later 20 chapter expansion.
While I read, I became aware that the novel is not the natural literary medium for Wilde. A character like Sir Henry could come straight out of one of Wilde's plays and there is a tension between the frothy cynical brilliance of the wit and the underlying tragedy of the novel. The 20 chapter version does give more character development but the style of writing is often overly rich while the earlier effort has considerable intensity--though even here some of the passages are simply over-elaborated. I am left with the impression that this should have been at most a novella or even a novelette. Dorian Gray's character is simply not interesting enough to sustain the length of even a short novel.
Still, it does have some brilliant moments--particularly in the dialogues and has an excellent fantasy theme which has become iconic.
Last edited by fantasyfan; 05-01-2014 at 02:34 PM.
|05-01-2014, 11:27 AM||#18|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chesapeake, VA, USA
Device: Kindle Paperwhite, iPad Air, LG Volt, & an iPod Nano.
As to your observation that the novel was not the natural literary medium for Wilde, I can only suppose that he also felt that way as well, as it was the only novel he ever published.
Last edited by WT Sharpe; 05-01-2014 at 11:34 AM.
|05-14-2014, 01:28 AM||#19|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Monroe Wisconsin
Device: K3, Kindle Paperwhite, Calibre, and Mobipocket for Pc (netbook)
Mr. Wilde did write some short fiction that is good. At least one story had some religious overtones in it as I recall. i.e. The Selfish Giant.
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Horror Wilde, Oscar: The Picture of Dorian Gray. v5 10 Sep 2014||Jellby||ePub Books||10||09-12-2014 05:38 PM|
|Horror Wilde, Oscar: The Picture of Dorian Gray. v3 24 Mar 2011||Jellby||Kindle Books||2||03-24-2011 11:27 AM|
|Other Fiction Wilde, Oscar: Das Bildnis des Dorian Gray, german, v1, 27 Feb 2009||ravenne||ePub Books||0||02-27-2009 04:48 PM|
|Other Fiction Wilde, Oscar: Das Bildnis des Dorian Gray, german, v1, 27 Feb 2009||ravenne||Kindle Books||0||02-27-2009 04:46 PM|
|Wilde, Oscar: The Picture of Dorian Gray. v1. 17 June 07||Dr. Drib||BBeB/LRF Books||0||06-17-2007 03:58 PM|