|04-17-2012, 01:16 AM||#31|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Grass Valley, CA
Device: EB 1150, EZ Reader, Literati, iPad 2
|04-17-2012, 01:33 AM||#32|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Device: iPad,Kindle 3, Nook 2
Hehe, the problem is, can you publish your web page if it can not pass w3c check? Can the browser show your web page if it contain some minor errors?
I don't deny that ePubcheck can be used as a reference or a helper, but it should not be abused as an arbiter.
|04-17-2012, 02:56 AM||#33|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Heemskerk, NL
Device: PRS-300, PRS-T1
I can publish my book without ePubCheck without a problem. Only, if I want to do it at certain cites, there the policy is that it must pass.
If I mess up my webpage, it will not show in the browser as I want. Will it show as I want when it does pass? Not always. Again, no change with regards to ebooks. There I am also depending on the interpretation of the specifications by the creator of the reader, just like browsers.
If certain cites wants to 'abuse' it as an arbiter, it is their choice. As it is mine to use their services. If I or a client wants me to use these services, I have no choice by using ePubCheck and I don't really care.
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Sigil 0.4.1 : unwanted span added by Sigil||Bertrand||Sigil||0||09-02-2011 05:28 AM|
|Sigil 0.3.4 / Sigil 0.4.0 RC1 / Cover in Nook Color||Bertrand||Sigil||13||08-06-2011 04:06 AM|
|Sigil 0.3.4 / Problème CSS entre Sigil et iPad||Grivels||Software||10||07-03-2011 09:06 AM|
|Web-based epubcheck upgraded to epubcheck 1.0.5||kjk||ePub||4||02-09-2010 09:53 PM|
|epubcheck||GeoffC||ePub||3||11-03-2009 04:26 AM|