|12-07-2011, 09:54 PM||#1|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: RI, USA
Device: Kindle Paperwhite, Kindle reader on iPad and iPhone
Kindle Fire Security over open WIFI
From the Amazon Help page on the Kindle Fire
It says --
"Amazon Silk encrypts all web traffic between the Kindle Fire and our AWS infrastructure, even where traditional browsers would not encrypt."
Since encrypting traffic is one of the key security measures for improving the safety of open WIFI hotspots, does this mean that the Kindle Fire is safer to use than a typical PC browser that only encrypts https traffic?
I understand that nothing is totally secure -- everything is vulnerable to injection attacks, weak key derivation processes, crumbled cookies and god knows what else. But it seems to me that the statement above from Amazon implies that the Silk browser is a bit tighter than a PC browser.
|12-08-2011, 12:55 PM||#2|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Sunshine Coast, BC
Device: Kindle PW, Fire HDX 8.9, Fire HD8.9, Fire 7HD, Surface 2
Is it more secure? Marginally. But honestly, no. You're sitting there with your device connected to a wide open wire that ANYONE can tap into. Open WiFi is inherently unsafe, and should be treated as the security nightmare it is.
(this doesn't mean don't use it. But don't use it where anything you're doing is even mildly sensitive. )
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Kindle confidentiality and security questions||ritef||Amazon Kindle||18||01-11-2012 01:21 PM|
|Security of the Kindle Store||Marc Mertens||Amazon Kindle||16||06-19-2011 04:43 PM|
|Classic how open is nook wifi?||charonme||Barnes & Noble NOOK||3||11-26-2010 07:21 AM|
|Kindle 2 Security||Jasoon Carey||Amazon Kindle||18||08-01-2009 11:35 AM|