|
View Poll Results: Copyright violation? | |||
Yes, it is a copyright violation even though the IP isn't protected in Canada and the source is Canadian. | 15 | 24.59% | |
It is not a violation. | 28 | 45.90% | |
Not sure | 18 | 29.51% | |
Voters: 61. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
03-19-2010, 12:21 AM | #31 | |
Paladin of Eris
Posts: 3,119
Karma: 20849349
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USAland
Device: Kindle 10
|
Quote:
Also I'm starting to think copyright is itself a misleading word, distributionright might be more apt. If I littered my house with piles of photocopies of copyrighted material or with hard drives filled with millions of copies of the same copyrighted file I can't think of any reason why I should fall afowl of any copyright law. Considering the near universal dislike for DRM on these board most seem to agree that the making of copies isn't the issue. |
|
03-19-2010, 08:59 AM | #32 |
Data Privateer!
Posts: 586
Karma: 62887
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fargo ND
Device: Ectaco Jetbook& Jetbook Lite
|
I can understand having a reasonable period of time to conclude contract negotionations, movie deals, and the like. And I can understand why publishers would want a reasonable period of time to make their money back.
What I can't see is allowing publishers a lifetime plus 70 years to make their share. 20 - 25 years, allowing extension for 5 year period, file fee for the extension should double every time its used. So if the first extension is $5k, the second would be 10k, the third 20k, etc. Quickly reaching the point where it is not worthwhile for most books. |
03-19-2010, 09:04 AM | #33 |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
Why do you believe that someone should have to pay to retain the rights to their own property?
|
03-19-2010, 10:09 AM | #34 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 11,247
Karma: 35000000
Join Date: Jan 2008
Device: Pocketbook
|
Quote:
If people want I.P. to be treated like real property, then they need to take the bad with the good, and pay for it's (and societies) upkeep. TANSTAAFL.... |
|
03-19-2010, 12:41 PM | #35 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 5,185
Karma: 25133758
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SF Bay Area, California, USA
Device: Pocketbook Touch HD3 (Past: Kobo Mini, PEZ, PRS-505, Clié)
|
Quote:
Written, musical, and flat-painted works are treated *differently* from other creative works. They're given a "property" right that doesn't exist for other works. Why shouldn't they have to pay to maintain it? |
|
03-19-2010, 02:36 PM | #36 |
Wizard
Posts: 2,409
Karma: 4132096
Join Date: Sep 2008
Device: Kindle Paperwhite/iOS Kindle App
|
I think the reason it's fair to expect works to eventually revert to the public domain is because authors don't create their works strictly from their own selves but they are influenced by and borrow from, a common pool of culture, therefore one of the rationales behind the public domain is that eventually their work returns to that common pool so others can draw from it just as they drew from the work of others who came before. For example, do you think JK Rowling was the first to come up with a story about a young boy who discovers a secret world, battles a nefarious bad guy and has a transformative journey? Of course not. The quest story is as old as stories themselves. Now, she does deserve the opportunity to profit from her particular interpretation and her own creative labours. But eventually, it should go back into the same pool of culture that she herself drew from when she created it.
|
03-19-2010, 02:38 PM | #37 | |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
Quote:
|
|
03-19-2010, 03:37 PM | #38 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 11,247
Karma: 35000000
Join Date: Jan 2008
Device: Pocketbook
|
Quote:
If you want to claim an economic benefit from your creation, you should have to pay. Nobody complains about the cost of patent filings, they aren't just handed out free. Why is copyright so special... Pre-Berne (1978) in the US, if you wanted a copyright you had to file for it, (just like making a claim on a piece of property), so that everyone could see that this piece of Intellectual Property was defined (you submitted a copy so there was no question what piece of I.P. was involved) and reserved for private economic use. Nowadays I can't just pitch out a Red story, and know it's going to fall into the public domain. I have to stamp Public Domain on it!, just so that cheap people can have I.P. lottery tickets! Sorry Harry, this gets my dander up..... |
|
03-19-2010, 04:26 PM | #39 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 5,185
Karma: 25133758
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SF Bay Area, California, USA
Device: Pocketbook Touch HD3 (Past: Kobo Mini, PEZ, PRS-505, Clié)
|
Quote:
Nevermind the books and paintings and photographs, which could, presumably, be in the marketplace earning their creators some money. It's the kids' sketches on refrigerators which are un-copyable for another 150 years that are the problem. It's the margin notes teachers make on homework, which can't be included in a book about modern education without getting permission from each & every teacher. It's the funny office memos that nobody knows or cares who wrote--except now, sharing it around requires a name and permission, and nobody wants to admit to writing "10 ways a toilet is better than my boss." |
|
03-19-2010, 05:16 PM | #40 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 11,247
Karma: 35000000
Join Date: Jan 2008
Device: Pocketbook
|
Quote:
Me, Me, ME.... I want to claim full and complete control over the toilet joke.... More seriously, the problem is that copyright law is backward to all other property rights. There is no automatic "it's mine" to any other type of property. Every other type required effort to invoke, and effort to transfer. I get a receipt when I buy my bag of lemon drops precisely to show the change of ownership. And that receipt is not free!!!. It's part of the costs of the store, just like salaries, stock cost, and property taxes for the location. So why is copyright so &@#$ SPECIAL??? It isn't I.P., per se, both Patent and Trademark require work to invoke and maintain. Just copyright. Because we all have to pay with the loss of our culture over time just so creative people can have an free I.P. lottery ticket? <Bleep> it, buy your own lottery tickets! You want copyright, then file the puppy! And of you don't file it, you lose it! (Sorry, have to talk with the men in white suits for a moment.) |
|
03-19-2010, 06:17 PM | #41 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 5,185
Karma: 25133758
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SF Bay Area, California, USA
Device: Pocketbook Touch HD3 (Past: Kobo Mini, PEZ, PRS-505, Clié)
|
Quote:
However, I'd love to see "everything [with a notice] is copyrighted for 10 years," followed by a mandatory registration to extend that. You get enough time to find out if it's financially valuable before you have to invest in it; corporations will register everything as a matter of course, and individuals will decide after graduation if their college research papers or film projects contained enough fascinating insights to bother keeping control over them. |
|
03-19-2010, 06:50 PM | #42 | |
Banned
Posts: 2,094
Karma: 2682
Join Date: Aug 2009
Device: N/A
|
Quote:
Ever wonder why many trademarks are marked (TM)? That's because they're not registered. A registered trademark (R/®/registered) has been paid for, but you can register after the infringement has started and still assert your rights. Design rights, where they exist, function in the same way. Trade secrets? Whole point is they're not "registered", they're generated in the normal course of business, just like copyright! Only patents require registration from the word go. |
|
03-19-2010, 08:16 PM | #43 | |
US Navy, Retired
Posts: 9,864
Karma: 13806776
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: North Carolina
Device: Icarus Illumina XL HD, Nexus 7
|
Quote:
However if law enforcement set up a site it would most likely be deemed entrapment. So while d/ling copyright materials is a violation only those distributing(sharing/selling) those copies are likely to be prosecuted. |
|
03-20-2010, 08:31 PM | #44 | |
Data Privateer!
Posts: 586
Karma: 62887
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fargo ND
Device: Ectaco Jetbook& Jetbook Lite
|
Quote:
You want to make 50k of a novel, fine, pay 500 up front and your protected. Second, how many authors are self published, big name stuff? They all sell those rights to publishers. So Publishers would be in the hot seat, deciding if they can make enough off the books to be worth paying the extension. Their choice, go or no go, will it pay or won't it? You want to tie the extension to 10% of how much that book has earned to date, fine by me. Heck you can even set it up for 2 year deferment, and pro rate it out as a % of sales. But, keep it short, and if someone wants to lock a book up for 50 years, make them PAY through the nose for it. |
|
03-20-2010, 08:58 PM | #45 |
Addict
Posts: 214
Karma: 511602
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: BC, Canada
Device: Aluratek Libre
|
If the copyright fee were not paid before the book went to the publisher, would the author not then lack recourse against the publisher if they copyrighted it in their own name and didn't pay a dime to the author?
Remember, the author no longer owns any copyright on the book under this scheme, so it wouldn't be copyright infringement. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Full HST (up to 15%) being charged on E-Books in Canada (books are 5% GST only) | Ellie Kennard | General Discussions | 18 | 07-30-2010 07:38 AM |
DRM protected Mobipocket books? | helten | Bookeen | 11 | 07-17-2008 07:59 AM |
Should Software be Protected by Patent, or by Copyright? | NatCh | News | 15 | 05-23-2007 02:12 PM |
DRM-protected e-books: Which format is right? | Alexander Turcic | News | 43 | 11-07-2006 09:34 PM |