02-22-2012, 10:57 AM | #1 | |
Loves Ellipsis...
Posts: 1,554
Karma: 7899232
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Washington, DC
Device: Kobo Wifi (broken), nook STR (returned), Kobo Touch, Sony T1
|
Paramount sues to stop new book in ‘Godfather’ series
From Here:
Quote:
...if they were really concerned, they wouldn't be getting ready to release Godfather: The Five Families as a Facebook game. Seriously? FB. Yeah, that's reputation concern there. |
|
02-22-2012, 12:21 PM | #2 |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
It's entirely irrelevant what Paramount have or haven't done with the franchise. The validity of the claim rests solely on whether or not Paramount really do have the rights that they believe they do. That's for a court to decide.
|
02-22-2012, 01:33 PM | #3 | ||
Loves Ellipsis...
Posts: 1,554
Karma: 7899232
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Washington, DC
Device: Kobo Wifi (broken), nook STR (returned), Kobo Touch, Sony T1
|
Quote:
The article states that point that Paramount is making is that the reason they want to keep the family from having any additional books written is to protect the franchise's reputation. If that is the argument they are going with...I think Paramount should prove that THEY [Paramount] are not tarnishing the reputation themselves. Cause that's the only reason for the lawsuit, right? And I think that a "gotcha" game on facebook (a company known for privacy violations) by Zynga (a company known for creating items that require the players to spend large amounts of money) is a tarnish to the reputation of the original books AND movies. Quote:
|
||
02-22-2012, 02:12 PM | #4 | |
PHD in Horribleness
Posts: 2,320
Karma: 23599604
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: In the ironbound section, near avenue L
Device: Just a whole bunch. I guess I am a collector now.
|
Quote:
Such an undertaking polishes a reputation like that, don't you think? For the record, Paramount is full of hooey on this one. |
|
02-22-2012, 02:19 PM | #5 |
Loves Ellipsis...
Posts: 1,554
Karma: 7899232
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Washington, DC
Device: Kobo Wifi (broken), nook STR (returned), Kobo Touch, Sony T1
|
|
02-22-2012, 02:37 PM | #6 | |
Gangnam style!
Posts: 373
Karma: 3646106
Join Date: Aug 2011
Device: Kobo
|
Quote:
In the eyes of the law, it would be entirely valid to say contractually we have all rights to the franchise and we don;t want others to tarnish that reputation, we prefer to do that ourselves, as is our sole right by the contract. What you prefer is entirely irrelevent. |
|
02-22-2012, 02:38 PM | #7 |
Guru
Posts: 992
Karma: 12000001
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Seattle Wahington U.S.
Device: kindle
|
The author should have had a MUCH better agent. Signing away that much of your creative rights is just foolish. For that book he should have insisted on limited rights for a strictly limited time period. I'd like to see publishers losing a lot of their power to insist on contracts like that.
|
02-22-2012, 02:39 PM | #8 | |
Professional Contrarian
Posts: 2,045
Karma: 3289631
Join Date: Mar 2009
Device: Kindle 4 No Touchie
|
Quote:
All that matters is the transfer of copyright as listed in the contracts between Mario Puzo and Paramount. If Puzo did in fact transfer control of the characters and the series to Paramount, and the estate is writing sequels without authorization, then they can block publication. This seems to be the case, though we should keep in mind that THR couldn't reach the Puzo estate for comment. The article also points out how there was one authorized sequel, one unauthorized sequel in 2006 (which apparently sucked and is already out of print) and now the estate is allegedly working on a third. Since Mario Puzo died in 1999, it seems clear the estate is basically looking for more income. That's fine -- as long as they do so within the confines of the agreement -- but let's not act like the estate has some nobler purpose either. |
|
02-22-2012, 03:01 PM | #9 | ||
occasional author
Posts: 2,314
Karma: 2064403292
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Wandering God's glorious hills, valleys and plains.
Device: A Franklin BI (before Internet) was the first. I still have it.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Mrs Joseph is right about Paramount's aims and character while HarryT is correct about their legal claims and rights. Personally I think that later authors furthering previous authors books usually results in a letdown for the reader though of course not for people making money on the new editions. There are near exceptions as with Robert Jordan laying out a theme for his final volume of his Wheel of Time Series as he lay dying and then his wife who had been his agent and critic for years choosing Brandon Sanderson to finish the final volume which became 3 volumes. (What did I say about "making money?") Another of my favorite older authors Jack Vance actually authorized some of his work to be continued in one direction while he delved into another deeper direction. I wish he had not done either of those. |
||
02-22-2012, 03:45 PM | #10 | |
occasional author
Posts: 2,314
Karma: 2064403292
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Wandering God's glorious hills, valleys and plains.
Device: A Franklin BI (before Internet) was the first. I still have it.
|
Quote:
(edited to remove appearance/evidence of carrying on) My whole point comes to this. If MGM came up and offered me a Million USD for all rights in perpetuity for my so called "Amazing Story" book, and they were going to make a movie about it, I would be sorely tempted. If they offered 2 Million, screen writing credits, and a contract to write further books (Amazing Story 2, Amazing Story 3, ..., ) with similar payoffs, I would become like warm butter on their lips. Like the fallen heroine in a trashy novel might say, "the company could have its way with me." The publishers will not lose their power as long as they have money the authors wants. If you personally were able to get some kind of "big brother" overriding law passed limiting contracts, then the money offered would go down proportionally and the authors would "hates you forever." Last edited by frahse; 02-22-2012 at 08:39 PM. |
|
02-22-2012, 04:04 PM | #11 |
Guru
Posts: 992
Karma: 12000001
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Seattle Wahington U.S.
Device: kindle
|
I recognize that money talks and it's hard to say no when someone is waving some big bucks at you, esp if you don't have much, but I still think his agent could have bargained better on his behalf. I don't want laws about this, I just want a lot more competion to the big six so an author can shop around more for better deals. I'd like to see a big 20 or 30 instead of 6.
|
02-22-2012, 04:42 PM | #12 | |
occasional author
Posts: 2,314
Karma: 2064403292
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Wandering God's glorious hills, valleys and plains.
Device: A Franklin BI (before Internet) was the first. I still have it.
|
Quote:
crossi, I didn't mean to come down so heavily on you earlier. In retrospect, I said too much, but I was already up in the air about something else and I only came to this site to take a break from that, but I think I was already carrying a hammer in my hand. My apologies, if I seemed rude or overbearing. |
|
02-22-2012, 10:07 PM | #13 | |
Grand Master of Flowers
Posts: 2,201
Karma: 8389072
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Naptown
Device: Kindle PW, Kindle 3 (aka Keyboard), iPhone, iPad 3 (not for reading)
|
Quote:
I don't know that much about movie studios, but I think that if they are investing $50-$100 million dollars in making a movie, they'll want to insist on pretty tight control over the rights unless the movie is guaranteed to make huge amounts of money. Turning to the actual topic, while the legal answer is going to depend on the wording of the contract, morally I tend to favor Paramount. At least the first two "Godfather" movies are classic works of American cinema. And it's not like Puzo's son is writing new works in the "Godfather" universe using his father's notes (like Christopher Tolkien); the family has just hired some random author to write additional books in the Godfather universe to make some extra money. (I think there have been some other sequels since Puzo's death, but I don't know the details). |
|
02-22-2012, 10:07 PM | #14 |
Guru
Posts: 777
Karma: 6356004
Join Date: Jan 2012
Device: Kobo Touch
|
Personal opinion? The world needs more authors, and less lawyers. (I won't even mention politicians )
Last edited by plib; 02-22-2012 at 10:09 PM. |
02-22-2012, 10:44 PM | #15 |
Guru
Posts: 992
Karma: 12000001
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Seattle Wahington U.S.
Device: kindle
|
Probably just as well if the books were stopped. Most sequels written by a different author don't turn out nearly as good as the origionals. The "voice" just isn't the same. I only know of a couple exceptions.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
HarperCollins Sues Open Road Over E-Book Rights | DonaldL. | News | 97 | 01-06-2012 02:22 PM |
Mark Winegardner and The Godfather series | SteveScaffardi | Reading Recommendations | 0 | 09-16-2011 10:58 AM |
Authors' Guild sues universities over book digitization project | K. Molen | News | 1 | 09-14-2011 05:07 AM |
Can you stop buying a series? | anamardoll | General Discussions | 104 | 06-17-2011 12:03 PM |
French publisher sues Google for e-book piracy | Alexander Turcic | News | 0 | 06-06-2006 10:45 PM |