01-26-2013, 12:14 PM | #31 |
The Dank Side of the Moon
Posts: 35,872
Karma: 118716293
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Device: Kindle2; Kindle Fire
|
Exactly. And this is one more reason that ebooks must be treated exactly the same as pbooks. There should be no difference. This is not about 'licensing' this is about a product.
Last edited by kennyc; 01-26-2013 at 12:19 PM. |
01-26-2013, 01:25 PM | #32 | |
Guru
Posts: 932
Karma: 15752887
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Norway
Device: Ipad, kindle paperwhite
|
Quote:
Fair enough - ebooks lasts forever while paperbooks doesn't. This means that e-books are worth more to the library than a paperbook which needs to be replaced. It is therefore not unreasonable that the library should pay more for the ebook. But this only makes sense if the libraries are allowed to treat the ebook and the paperbook the same way. They allready have paid a premium for the ebook* in order for it to last forever, so why insist that the premium-paid-for-book must expire? The publishers claim that they lose money if the library can lend a book forever. I claim that this is untrue. I'm not familiar with the american book market, but there are my reasons for for saying so for the Norwegian market: 1. Most books make money in their first couple of years. Then their popularity decreases, and new titles reach the market, making them yesterday's news. The book gets sold out from the publisher and difficult to get. Customers still interested in the book go to the libraries or the used book stores and buy/borrow it there. The publishers and the author doesn't get paid for this in any case. 2. Most books older than 5 years are impossible to find in bookstores. A second printing of books this old is rare. There often comes a second printing of new and popular books, but for older books a second printing is rare. The libraries or the used book stores are usually the only places to find these books in any case. 3. The market for most books more than 10 years old is very small. Best-sellers will always be in demand, and the best and most popular books can sell well after a decade. Most books won't, and disappears automatically from the market, going from rare to obscure. The publishers will always do what maximizes their profit. That's their job to do so, and that's what authors pay them to do. That is why the publishers can't be trusted to be preservers of literature because preservation never generates any profit at all. This is why the libraries must be the counterweight and fight against them. It is the libraries job to secure our cultural heritage, and they wouldn't have done their job properly if they accepted Macmillans "expire" strategy without a fair fight. *Even $25 for 50 lendings is a premium compared to a hardbound book that can last for at least the same number of lendings |
|
01-26-2013, 03:23 PM | #33 |
Basculocolpic
Posts: 4,356
Karma: 20181319
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Sweden
Device: Kindle 3 WiFi, Kindle 4SO, Kindle for Android, Sony PRS-350 and PRS-T1
|
I believe that is a distinct American phenomena, here they just store the books that nobody borrows in a central book depository. So the end result is that an e-book will be a cheaper proposition for a library since it will just reside on their server.
|
01-26-2013, 03:33 PM | #34 | |
Grand Master of Flowers
Posts: 2,201
Karma: 8389072
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Naptown
Device: Kindle PW, Kindle 3 (aka Keyboard), iPhone, iPad 3 (not for reading)
|
Quote:
Macmillan wasn't making e-books available to libraries at all. Now they are, at the cost of, perhaps, 50¢ per checkout. This is a better deal than Random House offered, and better than nothing. I don't think that turning down this offer will cause MM to make a better offer, or help customers at all. |
|
01-26-2013, 04:13 PM | #35 | |
The Dank Side of the Moon
Posts: 35,872
Karma: 118716293
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Device: Kindle2; Kindle Fire
|
Quote:
|
|
01-26-2013, 04:50 PM | #36 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
|
Quote:
The bone here is the *expiration*. A pbook that costs even US$100 (an extreme case) can circulate 52 times (or more) in two years and after that remain available for a decade or more. A less popular book can likewise remain available for occasional checkout for decades--regardless of whether the publisher keeps it in print. (The university library I studied at had a Science Fiction collection donated by the nearby Air Force Base that included original editions of the LENSMEN and FOUNDATION series from the 50's that were carefully handled and prefectly usable after decades, long after the original publisher had been merged out of existence.) With expiration, however, the less popular titles would expire and likely *not* get replaced. And, as pointed out; even the popular ebooks would only get replaced if the publisher chooses to make them available. The clear intent here is to turn the libraries into rental outlets for Macmillan. (For the record, what the american libraries do is buy multiple copies when the books are popular and then as time goes on they sell off the extra copies to clear shelf space for new purchases. So they still keep copies of the books on the shelves. With interlibrary loan systems they don't have to keep a copy in every single library, or a warehouse, as long as the system has a few for shared checkouts.) |
|
01-26-2013, 05:32 PM | #37 | |
Is that a sandwich?
Posts: 8,189
Karma: 100500000
Join Date: Jun 2010
Device: Nook Glowlight Plus
|
Quote:
The interlibrary loan system has been a lifesaver for sci-fi and anything else over 30 years old. This would seem to support ebooks. They are long lasting, however, they are hampered by high IT costs either from Overdrive or in-house personnel. |
|
01-26-2013, 10:14 PM | #38 |
doofus
Posts: 2,522
Karma: 13088847
Join Date: Sep 2010
Device: Kobo Libra 2, Kindle Voyage
|
I routinely go through "best of" lists from yesteryears and try to find older books I missed or meant to read when they came out. With this model, it will cost my library money to make older books available, meaning most books will fall by the wayside.
Just. Say. No. |
01-26-2013, 11:02 PM | #39 |
Basculocolpic
Posts: 4,356
Karma: 20181319
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Sweden
Device: Kindle 3 WiFi, Kindle 4SO, Kindle for Android, Sony PRS-350 and PRS-T1
|
In Sweden every book published, and I believe this now includes e-books, are also deposited in national book depositories. I think there are three, the Royal Library and two national university libraries. Does American publishers have the same responsibility?
|
01-26-2013, 11:16 PM | #40 | |
Bookaholic
Posts: 14,391
Karma: 54969924
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Minnesota
Device: iPad Mini 4, AuraHD, iPhone XR +
|
Quote:
However the Library of Congress doesn't retain copies of all works IIRC. Not sure what the criteria are for what gets kept and what doesn't. |
|
01-27-2013, 10:33 PM | #41 |
Nodding at stupid things
Posts: 209
Karma: 4097046
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Toronto, Canada
Device: Sony T1, OnePlus 6, Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e, iPad Mini 2, PC
|
I'm seeing a lot of "damned if they do, damned if they don't." On the one hand, we've got people harumphing loudly about how this is unacceptable because e-books don't wear out so they should never, ever expire and they should certainly cost less than paper books. All kind of foot stamping because the BPHs just "don't get" this new technology and want to try to apply their outmoded thinking to it. They have to embrace the new paradigm and stop thinking like they're selling paper books. Damned.
Then we've got much tsking and tutting because they want to change the way they make their books available. Sell the right to libraries to distribute the book for a certain number of borrowings or a certain time and allow a frictionless borrowing experience to users. How dare they! Damned again. The industry certainly needs to find new ways to do business. This deal, however, doesn't seem terribly bad. Oh, sure, some changes could be made. Allow libraries to buy multiple copies of bestsellers under this model and, after the book has been out for two years, let them buy a copy that will last 120 borrowings with no expiration date or a 10 year limit or something. There's a constructive idea right there. Do you know what's not constructive? Screaming "Don't ever buy their books if they cost more than a dollar and have any limits on borrowings or any expiration dates." Publishing is a business. They want to make money. The services that publishers provide are useful: they wade through slush piles, they provide editorial guidance, they produce and market the material in a saleable form. How much that is worth is certainly under discussion in the world of publishing and should be. However, it is worth something. The value in a paper book is not in the paper. That's worth a couple of bucks. Amazon and other big chains have been discounting paper books so long that many people have come to view it as their right to have every book they want for very little money. Now they want e-books for practically nothing. Fine! You don't want to pay those involved in producing these books, then go pirate them. It's easy enough to do. Just go do it and shut up. Then, when all the publishers have gone bust, and we're all up to our ears in a self-published sea of bad vampire fiction, 50 Shades knock-offs, derivative high-fantasy, and all other manner of crimes against literature, we'll know who to thank. |
01-27-2013, 11:36 PM | #42 |
Resident Curmudgeon
Posts: 73,983
Karma: 128903378
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Roslindale, Massachusetts
Device: Kobo Libra 2, Kobo Aura H2O, PRS-650, PRS-T1, nook STR, PW3
|
One thing that happens to make older books popular again is when a book in a series is released, it becomes popular. People who have not read the series want to start at the beginning to see what it's all about. But no, the eBook license has expired for the older books. You lose, the publisher loses and the author loses.
|
01-28-2013, 12:28 AM | #43 | |
Nodding at stupid things
Posts: 209
Karma: 4097046
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Toronto, Canada
Device: Sony T1, OnePlus 6, Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e, iPad Mini 2, PC
|
Quote:
Publishers could offer earlier books in the series at a discount when the libraries buy the new one. Or buy five of the new one, get two of the earlier ones free. Or put together a library only bundle that includes all the books in one e-book for borrowing. Who knows? What we do know is that under this new program there are now titles from Macmillan available. Titles that weren't available before. And yet, somehow, all you can see is that this is somehow worse than having no titles available. |
|
01-28-2013, 01:01 AM | #44 |
monkey on the fringe
Posts: 45,477
Karma: 158151390
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Seattle Metro
Device: Moto E6, Echo Show
|
That's because it is worse. If this is all Macmillan can come up with, then it's best to tell them to shove it and move on. I don't want my tax dollars squandered on such harsh restrictions.
|
01-28-2013, 01:59 AM | #45 |
Nodding at stupid things
Posts: 209
Karma: 4097046
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Toronto, Canada
Device: Sony T1, OnePlus 6, Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e, iPad Mini 2, PC
|
Thank you for your constructive and thoughtful comments. I lay prostrate, bowled over by the intellectual juggernaut that is your argument.
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"Library Friendly" - an interesting idea from Library Thing | Snowman | General Discussions | 0 | 11-07-2010 07:26 PM |
Dear MacMillan... | Alfy | News | 50 | 03-28-2010 12:27 AM |
Why Macmillan was banned from Amazon | LCF | News | 76 | 02-19-2010 06:58 PM |
Macmillan Announces $5.99 eBooks | Barcey | News | 30 | 02-03-2010 11:23 AM |
Are Tor-Macmillan still not on amazon? | stustaff | News | 13 | 02-02-2010 02:23 PM |