|
View Poll Results: Should Amazon license their Kindle service to third parties? | |||
Yes, this would make perfect sense. | 36 | 70.59% | |
No, Amazon needs the exclusivity of the Kindle. | 15 | 29.41% | |
Voters: 51. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
01-17-2008, 12:33 PM | #16 |
Books and more books
Posts: 917
Karma: 69499
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: White Plains, NY, USA
Device: Nook Color, Itouch, Nokia770, Sony 650, Sony 700(dead), Ebk(given)
|
If Sony (or Amazon for that matter) is not making good money on the hardware they would be wise to get out since it's very hard and tricky to make loads of money on e-content.
|
01-22-2008, 03:57 PM | #17 |
Enthusiast
Posts: 37
Karma: 484
Join Date: Nov 2007
Device: Amazon Kindle, PC/Mobipocket Reader, Palm T3
|
Amazon would have to offer a licensed AZW ereader to manufacturers of competing devices, and this software would most likely have to be included in the specific device's footprint (with the possible exception of the iRex).
Note also that the Kindle most likely doesn't let the user see the entire file system. What is seen when the Kindle is acting as a USB drive is certainly somewhere below the root of the onboard storage volume. I'd bet that there's a 'rights' file somewhere that users can't access, but Kindle firmware can, that ensures an AZW file on a particular device 'belongs' to that user (via device serial # registered w/Amazon). So, while I can see Amazon working with other ereader manufacturers, I can't ever see this as something Amazon would offer direct to the user. Actually, unless another ereader takes off, I can't see Amazon working with other ereaders. Where's the benefit to Amazon? It would be like Apple working with another music player manufacturer so that the latter could support iTunes. |
01-22-2008, 05:44 PM | #18 | |
Resident Curmudgeon
Posts: 73,866
Karma: 128597114
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Roslindale, Massachusetts
Device: Kobo Libra 2, Kobo Aura H2O, PRS-650, PRS-T1, nook STR, PW3
|
Quote:
|
|
01-23-2008, 05:11 AM | #19 |
Connoisseur
Posts: 75
Karma: 361
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Va. Beach, VA
Device: Kindle
|
It sounds like the Kindle is not for some people. It has features they don't want so they should probably find a reader that better suits their needs.
Other people, many other people it would seem, appear to want the features offered by the Kindle and find the device very purposeful. Those folks should probably buy the Kindle instead of the other readers. Isn't it great that some folks can be happy with their Sony while others are happy with their Kindle? Isn't a choice between different devices a good thing so that each different person has a better chance of finding what best fits his or her needs? The irony is that is seems that every time the next "big thing" comes out, folks frequently complain that it has too much or too little, that it doesn't work well for them, that what they already have is better, yada, yada, yada. But if one device comes out that hordes and hordes of people find purposeful to them, other people complain that that company that makes that device is trying to be a monopoly to take over the world. Imagine if the Kindle had came out and it was exactly what most people wanted. Lots of people would be happy about that, but others would still complain about "monopolies" and "evil companies" if Amazon all of a sudden took the lion's share of the e-reader market. As it happens, that may very much be the case, but I suppose time will tell. In the case of Apple and iTunes, it's popular because it is a device with a service that lots of people really enjoy. Apple is not evil for providing a product that people are devouring. If anyone would be to blame it would be the people, who without force, go and buy the iPod and iTunes. Apple could not have been so successful with that device if it did not meet the needs and desires of LOTS of consumers. I like the Kindle because of what it does for me. I like my iPod because of what it does for me. This has absolutely nothing to do with whether other people enjoy their Sonys or their Zunes. I'm happy for them that they have found devices serve their purpose. Come on folks, isn't that a good thing? |
01-23-2008, 08:45 AM | #20 |
Connoisseur
Posts: 94
Karma: 8443
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: NJ
Device: Kindle 3G, Sony PRS-505
|
Let's look for a minute at their core businesses -
What I think would be great and won't likely ever happen is that Amazon will offer it's content to the Sony Reader market. As long as the Kindle is in the picture, this isn't going to happen. Perhaps Borders can put the Sony Reader on a more even content footing with the Kindle. Currently I'm far from starving for content on my Sony Reader, but having more options is very appealing. I wouldn't give up my Sony Reader for the current Kindle (I already carry other gadgets that far outshine it's added features), but I am jealous of the Amazon store and their book marketing muscle. PCH |
01-23-2008, 10:50 AM | #21 | |||||
Connoisseur
Posts: 75
Karma: 361
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Va. Beach, VA
Device: Kindle
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Businesses expand and enter new territories all the time, typically not based on arrogance but on calculated risk. That can be the sign of a good business and of a good businessman; taking risks. While some may characterize risk-takers as arrogant, I would characterize this particular risk as bold instead. Quote:
While it is hard to determine anything of real measure with comparative sales figures, I've read more than a few posts in different forums about people being brought into the e-reader world for the first time by the Kindle. That coupled with quite a few glowing reviews suggests it may be premature to call Amazon's venture a failure or "less than stellar". Time will tell. Until then, hurrah to the arrogant upstarts of the world! |
|||||
01-23-2008, 11:01 AM | #22 |
fruminous edugeek
Posts: 6,745
Karma: 551260
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northeast US
Device: iPad, eBw 1150
|
I think Amazon will continue to limit Kindle service until they sell through their initial investment into the hardware. (Just because they're back-ordered, doesn't mean they haven't paid for more units than they have currently. And there's the design cost to consider, too.) After that happens, Amazon will have to decide if they want to stay in the cut-throat world of consumer electronics, or play to their strengths as book sellers. I think their best bet would be the second strategy -- open up the format more and sell as many books as possible to be read on as wide a range of devices as possible.
The only other potential obstacle I see is the book publishers, who may have demanded the tight lock on the Kindle hardware in order to allow their content to be sold. Hopefully they'll come to their senses soon as well, and realize that limiting customer use limits sales, and there's lots and lots of money to be made by opening up the limitations a little. |
01-23-2008, 01:26 PM | #23 | |
Connoisseur
Posts: 81
Karma: 100
Join Date: Jan 2008
Device: Kindle
|
Quote:
|
|
01-23-2008, 01:35 PM | #24 |
Connoisseur
Posts: 75
Karma: 361
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Va. Beach, VA
Device: Kindle
|
|
01-23-2008, 07:16 PM | #25 | |
Connoisseur
Posts: 94
Karma: 8443
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: NJ
Device: Kindle 3G, Sony PRS-505
|
Quote:
PCH Last edited by PHugger; 01-23-2008 at 07:18 PM. |
|
01-23-2008, 08:42 PM | #26 | |||
Connoisseur
Posts: 75
Karma: 361
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Va. Beach, VA
Device: Kindle
|
Quote:
I guess my main objection may be a semantic one at times. Some folks make statements about things as though they are universally true instead of recognizing that they are merely reflecting how much of a value (or disvalue) something is to them. The difference would be seen in these to statements; 1) The Kindle is a failure. 2) The Kindle fails to interest me. Quote:
My thumb fits well between the keyboard and the screen on either side making each page button easily a short muscle memory away. The only feature "unnecessary" for me is the mp3 player. That said, I still may use in on occasion. While my main interest if functionality, my opinion on the aesthetics are like this; the Sony is cold and sterile looking whereas the Kindle design has character. The Kindle design says, "I'm not like the other readers." Clearly this can work both ways in terms of its appeal to consumers Quote:
|
|||
01-24-2008, 04:37 AM | #27 |
The Introvert
Posts: 8,307
Karma: 1000077497
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Device: Sony Reader PRS-650 & 505 & 500
|
|
01-25-2008, 11:13 PM | #28 |
Groupie
Posts: 152
Karma: 854
Join Date: Dec 2007
Device: Lifebook T5010
|
As a Sony PRS-505 owner, I dont' care about DRM-infected-excrement. Amazon's store is useless for ebooks. I'll buy a paper book from them and rip it myself, but I will not buy their ebooks.
This is like people ripping CDs, and ignoring pay-per-song online DRM-infected music downloads. Andy |
01-25-2008, 11:35 PM | #29 |
Connoisseur
Posts: 81
Karma: 100
Join Date: Jan 2008
Device: Kindle
|
I just wanted to point out that the Kindle comes with a screenshot function built-in. You could flip and click through all of the pages unless there is some kind of limit on the number of screenshots per book. From there, Optical Character Recognition is just a few clicks away. Anyone who has actually tried to convert one of their paper books to txt using OCR can tell you that the big hassle is getting the text straight. OCR software usually blows it when the text isn't strictly horizontal. Even a little slant lowers recognition. That issue would be completely moot if you used the Kindle's screenshots.
note: I'm not advocating that anyone rip Kindle books and post them on the darknet. I'm just pointing out that the Kindle's drm is trivially bypassed. |
02-01-2008, 03:04 AM | #30 |
Enthusiast
Posts: 41
Karma: 10
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Jose, Calif., USA
Device: Kindle
|
It's important to me to be ethical, and deal only with ethical businesses. But before you get the wrong idea, I consider DRM to be unethical, as we have copyright laws to do what they are trying to do with brute force. Rather I would consider it totally ethical for programmers capable of writing format conversion programs to take a .AZW file from a Kindle, unloaded from the Kindle to a hard disk using the supplied USB cable, and convert it back to a format that can be edited or printed by about any PC owner.
Fortunately in the EU of Europe, some countries are considering outlawing the use of DRM whether for text, music, or what have you. Maybe when that happens we can get the "bought" politicians in this country to give up such illegal income and pass laws in support of our basic copyright laws, and make anything else -- like DRM -- illegal. Charles Wilkes, San Jose, Calif. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Amazon won't sell the Kindle in Israel anymore | Dave Berk | Amazon Kindle | 15 | 10-12-2010 09:38 AM |
Target to sell Amazon Kindle | DMcCunney | News | 26 | 06-09-2010 08:35 PM |
Amazon to sell larger Kindle | sibelhodge | News | 1 | 01-06-2010 03:18 AM |
For Every 100 Books amazon Sell In Physical, they Sell 48 Kindle Books | yagiz | News | 3 | 12-01-2009 10:55 AM |
New Amazon service - Kindle 2.0 implications? | Daithi | Amazon Kindle | 15 | 11-21-2008 06:27 PM |