11-29-2007, 04:11 AM | #1 |
Junior Member
Posts: 8
Karma: 10
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Australia
Device: zaurus SL-3100, maybe Iliad soon, still looking
|
Hello and a request for opinions T2010 vs Iliad
Hi everyone,
I am very interested in getting a mobile device for reading PDFs for research purposes. I have a lot of experiences with different OSs, I guess you could call me an OS slut... Amiga, Linux, Mac OS X, Windows CE, QNX Neutrino, etc. I run 3 linux servers and also have a small web-hosting/development company. I have been using a Linux based Zaurus 3100 for more than a year and have been impressed by what can be squeezed out of such a small device with linux... So, my question... I am so undecided about whether to get an Iliad or to get a tablet PC. Until recently battery life would have been the clincher, but the Fujitsu T2010 gets 8hrs +, enough to get through the work day and apparently has an outdoor viewable screen. Does anyone have any advice on how the experience of reading PDFs compares between a tablet PC (running linux/windows) and the Iliad? Also, I have read the posts but I still don't quite get it as to why Iliad cannot suspend... it has almost the exact same hardware as my Zaurus which suspends very happily indeed... surely this could be kernel hacked, even if it was by saving a ram image to CF for reloading upon reboot.. actually this would probebly take almost as long as booting normally anyway! |
11-29-2007, 05:39 AM | #2 |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
If you're buying a machine specifically for reading PDFs, I'd go for the Tablet PC. The iLiad is as good as eInk devices get for reading PDFs, but it still doesn't compare with Adobe Reader on an LCD screen.
|
Advert | |
|
11-29-2007, 07:19 AM | #3 |
Junior Member
Posts: 8
Karma: 10
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Australia
Device: zaurus SL-3100, maybe Iliad soon, still looking
|
Thanks Harry, I appreciate the advice.
The main thing I was picking up from the forums is that people are saying that for extended reading, the e-ink is easier on the eyes. I certainly find that I fatigue more quickly reading off a screen than on paper, do you think that e-ink displays are noticably better for extended reading that an LCD? |
11-29-2007, 08:17 AM | #4 | |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
Quote:
What do other people think? |
|
11-29-2007, 10:11 AM | #5 |
reader
Posts: 6,975
Karma: 5183568
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mississippi, USA
Device: Kindle 3, Kobo Glo HD
|
If you are willing to lug around 4 lbs then the T2010 will certainly give you PDFs closer to full size than the iLiad. The other issue is eye strain, which is apparently caused by screen flicker (no flicker with E-Ink). The few PDFs I have tried were all readable on the iLiad, but I have not read PDFs for an extended period.
The iLiad is the most Zaurus-like of the existing e-book Readers, but the range of software available is still quite limited (e.g. much less than a Nokia 770 or 8X0). It is primarily a device for reading and note taking with some capability in other areas. |
Advert | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
feature request: support for iliad on OS X | petteri | Calibre | 1 | 12-30-2009 08:23 AM |
Your opinions please | Simonm | News | 14 | 12-09-2009 12:43 PM |
looking to purchase -- opinions? | damorg | Sony Reader | 6 | 08-17-2009 07:00 AM |
iLiad Iliad feature request (and poll): Third-party application support | haridasi | iRex Developer's Corner | 0 | 07-27-2008 07:29 PM |
Iliad protection and a Request | CommanderROR | iRex | 9 | 06-30-2006 06:33 AM |