01-23-2012, 09:54 AM | #1 | |
TuxSlash
Posts: 392
Karma: 2436547
Join Date: Oct 2009
Device: GlowNook
|
Publishers see Amazon as Predatory
Quote:
Gee, Amazon is evil and predatory, yet when other Publishers were asked first they didn't want to pick up on an out of print project. Sounds a bit like crying wolf, to me. |
|
01-23-2012, 10:04 AM | #2 |
Blue Captain
Posts: 1,595
Karma: 5000236
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Australia
Device: Kindle Keyboard 3G,Huawei Ideos X3,Kobo Mini
|
Yeah, because price fixing is all prey-like and all.
Unlike Doc Holliday, their hypocrisy does go so far. |
01-23-2012, 10:07 AM | #3 | |
Lunatic
Posts: 1,691
Karma: 4386372
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Land of the Loonie
Device: Kindle Paperwhite and Keyboard, Kobo Aura, iPad mini, iPod Touch
|
Or just crying.
Quote:
Seriously, publishers complaining that Amazon is selling too many books and eReaders? Like it or not, the convenience of Amazon has gotten a ton more people reading and buying books in the last decade. Rarely do they get credit for that. There are issues with Amazon's model, but this article doesn't address those. |
|
01-23-2012, 10:15 AM | #4 |
Avid Reader
Posts: 769
Karma: 7777778
Join Date: Aug 2009
Device: PocketBook 902, Galaxy Tab 2 7.0, ASUS TF700, and Cybook Gen III
|
Amazon wants to lower prices.
Publishers want to raise prices. Who is the predator? |
01-23-2012, 10:36 AM | #5 |
Zealot
Posts: 132
Karma: 179412
Join Date: Dec 2011
Device: Kindle 1, Kindle 3, Kindle Fire w/Aldiko
|
I don't always love everything Amazon does, but in this case, if they want to resurrect out-of-print books and make them available again, I'm all for it. If the other publishers turned it down, they have no one to blame but themselves.
|
01-23-2012, 10:46 AM | #6 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
|
The *Big* Publishing Houses want a scarcity economy that allows them to charge high prices to cover their high overhead. Predators need meat, after all.
But not all publishers are doing that. A lot are taking avantage of the extremely low overhead of ebook publishing to create and grow *their* publishing houses. And what better low-overhead content than known-good out-of-print books? If anything, Amazon is helping spawn an entire new wave of small publishers that, over time, may grow pretty big in their own right. It is these little "piranhas", small, agile, and hungry that are the real threat to the BPHs. By focusing on Amazon, they're just giving the New Publishers cover to hunt and feed and grow. Do notice, Amazon generally ignores all the BPH FUD; this PR "war" between Amazon and the publishers is distinctly one-sided. The BPHs whine and Amazon just shrugs it off and keeps on rolling along. Which is what they need to do. Expect more of these deals; the backlist is where the biggest ebook money is to be found. Last edited by fjtorres; 01-23-2012 at 10:48 AM. |
01-23-2012, 10:50 AM | #7 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 5,185
Karma: 25133758
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SF Bay Area, California, USA
Device: Pocketbook Touch HD3 (Past: Kobo Mini, PEZ, PRS-505, Clié)
|
I see Amazon as predatory. Its policies are arbitrary and often discriminatory, and it really is trying to stomp out its competition.
I just see it as a future-oriented predator that's focused on "give most people what they want, and make sure they're buying it from us," instead of one that's trying to drag me back into the 50's. |
01-23-2012, 11:15 AM | #8 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
|
Hmm, all this talk about finding and bringing back out-of-print books sounds like a fine solution to the "orphan works problem" that doesn't involve giving in to Google's land-grab. Instead, dozens or hundreds of small businesses can hunt down the copyright owners and *pay* them to bring their "orphaned" works back to market.
Readers get the content, creators get paid, Google loses its excuse to take over other people's work. Works for me. |
01-23-2012, 11:59 AM | #9 |
Frequent Flier
Posts: 1,282
Karma: 2058993297
Join Date: Oct 2011
Device: KB kindle aboard, Galx Tab 7.0 Plus, trying out Droid 1 as mini-tab
|
Amazon is the way, the truth, the true light.
Don't pay attention to those jealous whining failures. |
01-23-2012, 12:00 PM | #10 |
Wizard
Posts: 3,117
Karma: 9269999
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: UK
Device: Sony- T3, PRS650, 350, T1/2/3, Paperwhite, Fire 8.9,Samsung Tab S 10.5
|
Reservations...
Any of these books pub-dom ? I presume not, otherwise there be no money to be made for anyone.
And I'd love to know how many other publishing houses she "shopped it out to" . If it's such a good idea, why did the publishing world en masse turn it down ? Mind you, I suppose Amazon probably has more cash to risk on a possibly shakey proposition..... Not that I necessarily doubt anyones altruistic motives, but have Amazon hitherto shown any great enthusiasm for printing stuff that should "never have gone out of print anyway" ? As far as I can see, it's an interesting idea to publish works that will won't be expensive to get the rights to, with the equivalent of some "bonus tracks/out-takes" tacked on to give them, hopefully, some sales. Amazon doesn't have to price 'em high to cover initial costs, after all. It's probably worth a punt, with their resources. But the scale talked about in the article, well, I can see why "straight" publishers held back. And it would certainly have been harder for them to finance sufficient interest to get the venture of the ground, compared to the "Dark Side" ! |
01-23-2012, 12:06 PM | #11 |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
Publishers don't always do sensible things. Remember that J.K. Rowling had to use a vanity press publisher for the first print run of the initial "Harry Potter" book because she couldn't find a commercial publisher to take it on.
|
01-23-2012, 12:15 PM | #12 | |
Wizard
Posts: 1,717
Karma: 3790058
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: NYC
Device: Kindle Paperwhite, Sony 650
|
Quote:
eP |
|
01-23-2012, 12:18 PM | #13 | |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
Quote:
EDIT: A little reading shows that I'm wrong - Bloomsbury were indeed the initial publisher, printing 1000 copies (which are now worth a great deal of money). Thank you for the correction. Last edited by HarryT; 01-23-2012 at 12:24 PM. |
|
01-23-2012, 12:27 PM | #14 |
Wizard
Posts: 1,717
Karma: 3790058
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: NYC
Device: Kindle Paperwhite, Sony 650
|
Harry: did it have a different title? Of course such a book would be highly collectible, and yet I can't find any information on it. There was an uncorrected proof from Bloomsbury with an edition of 200.
eP |
01-23-2012, 12:33 PM | #15 |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Publishers Week: Amazon Ups Its Edge | Maggie Leung | News | 7 | 01-30-2011 01:25 PM |
Are publishers out to get Amazon? | pwalker8 | General Discussions | 4 | 05-26-2010 03:18 PM |
My letter to Amazon and E-Book Publishers | gabrieldj | General Discussions | 34 | 04-20-2010 09:19 PM |
Aussie Publishers Reject Amazon Kindle | sforce | News | 19 | 08-22-2009 01:53 AM |
Is Amazon Blackmailing POD Publishers? | Nate the great | News | 52 | 04-02-2008 02:54 PM |