10-26-2009, 12:51 AM | #1 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 19,832
Karma: 11844413
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tampa, FL USA
Device: Kindle Touch
|
Engadget claims Adobe "developed" ePub
Ok,
I think Engadget has it's facts wrong here... or I do? This http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/25/s...ook-with-epub/ article boldly states: Quote:
I personally think the the author of the Engadget article is a bit confused. Adobe developed the Adept DRM wrapper and a mobile reader device SDK and encryption server product which packages ePub (and PDF) files. Do people feel that this confusion over the ePub format verses the Adobe DRM isn't going to confuse people. Heck, if Engadget is confused, how is the lay person not going to be. If I am totally of base on this, perhaps I am the one that is confused. Discuss. BOb |
|
10-26-2009, 01:37 AM | #2 |
Murderous Mustela
Posts: 10,196
Karma: 47842158
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The other land of schnitzel and beer
Device: iPad M1 Pro, Kindle Paperwhite
|
Considering how frequently Engadget writers fumble with facts, I wouldn't give them much credit here.
|
Advert | |
|
10-26-2009, 05:31 AM | #3 | |
Addict
Posts: 229
Karma: 887
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Utah, USA
Device: iPad, iPhone 4
|
Quote:
Frankly I don't think it matters at all. ePub + DRM != ePub. DRM poisons an "open" "standard" making it neither. So all the excitement over ePub adoption by companies wrapping it up in DRM is misplaced... severely. |
|
10-26-2009, 08:53 AM | #4 |
Exwyzeeologist
Posts: 535
Karma: 3261
Join Date: Jun 2009
Device: :PRS-505::iPod touch:
|
It's true that Adobe didn't develop ePub -- it was developed by the IPDF. However, Adobe is one of the largest technology companies involved with the IPDF, and I think it's fair to say that they had a fairly large role in steering some of the decisions that the IPDF made. But again, they didn't develop the format themselves.
As for the credibility of Engadget, to me it's always seemed like a site run by fanboys that just happens to have a decent budget and a large company standing behind them. But that still doesn't mean that their "reporting" is particularly accurate. |
10-26-2009, 09:04 AM | #5 |
Hibernian eBook Warrior
Posts: 184
Karma: 1264
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Cork, Ireland
Device: Sony Reader
|
Its widely known in the industry that Adobe are heavily involved in the development of Epub. I dont see anything wrong with this really, as it is an open format.
Ok, so it benefits Adobe greatly as they have the drm and distribution platform for the format, but ultimately, the consumer wins as better and better versions of the format and its delivery emerge (I'm thinking improved features, rentals, sociable drm etc) The only danger would be if Adobe assumed control over Epub which is unlikely. |
Advert | |
|
10-26-2009, 09:25 AM | #6 | |
Sir Penguin of Edinburgh
Posts: 12,375
Karma: 23555235
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: DC Metro area
Device: Shake a stick plus 1
|
Quote:
|
|
10-26-2009, 09:49 AM | #7 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
|
The article is factually correct.
The epub "standard" that allows consumers to buy epub books is owned lock, stock, and barrel by adobe. They control the DRM, the back-end servers, the reader software, and the file creation software. For all intents and purposes, epub is what adobe says it is, not what the nominal spec says. Just look at the calibre and sigil forums; whenever there is an issue displaying an epub file, who has to adjust? The adobe software? Or the conversion tool? Since the committee spec, like all committee specs, is loose and has room for interpretation, and there is no serious compliance program with teeth, the dominant interpretation is adobe's. Moving forward, epub is, in effect, adobe-controlled. No two ways about it; even B&N had to go through Adobe to implement their own *proprietary* DRM, which has now been subsumed and is controlled and licensed by adobe. Absent a certification program that can tell adobe to stick to the letter of the spec, the true test of epub compliance is how it displays on ADE. That is true control. And since they are the ones pushing for its adoption as a counter to big bad evil Amazon they are in fact "developing the epub standard". Nothing to fault the author for, other than not fully documenting his facts. But the facts, he's got them right. |
10-26-2009, 11:10 AM | #8 |
Wizard
Posts: 1,790
Karma: 507333
Join Date: May 2009
Device: none
|
But, but, but... isn't ePub OPEN like the endless blue skies of Mongolia, unfettered by the ugly corporatism afflicting all other eBook formats that are therefore not just impure but downright soiled?
Did my mother LIE to me??? - Ahi |
10-26-2009, 11:24 AM | #9 | |
Guru
Posts: 714
Karma: 2003751
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Ottawa, ON
Device: Kobo Glo HD
|
Quote:
If one assumes that DRM for ebooks will follow the fate of DRM for music (that is, disappear), the de facto Adobe control of the DRM side of ePub is time-bound, as well. I couldn't care less about Adobe's control of the DRM ePub's. |
|
10-26-2009, 11:32 AM | #10 | ||||||||
Zealot
Posts: 138
Karma: 372
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: New York, NY
Device: Sony PRS-600, Nook Color, iPad
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
"Reading Systems may include additional processing functions, such as compression, indexing, encryption, rights management, and distribution. " Quote:
Quote:
- Ed |
||||||||
10-26-2009, 12:15 PM | #11 | ||
New York Editor
Posts: 6,384
Karma: 16540415
Join Date: Aug 2007
Device: PalmTX, Pocket eDGe, Alcatel Fierce 4, RCA Viking Pro 10, Nexus 7
|
Quote:
Quote:
______ Dennis |
||
10-26-2009, 01:58 PM | #12 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
|
We may by dealing with semantics but in the real world there is a difference between standards and paper specifications. Standards are tied to actual products and there are penalties for not adhering to them (as MS discovered when they licensed Java and didn't read the buried fine print).
Specifications simply list product features and components or attributes.Epub aspires to be a standard but the bodybthat drafted the specification did not tievit to any product nor is their any meaningful certification process that say; you either pass this test or you can't call it epub. Such a test must by definition require ecactly the same performance on all certified products. (DVDs are supposed to play the same way on all DVD players regardless of what code lies underneath; epubs display differently pretty much everywhere.) A "standard" without a certification process and penalties for incomplete/improper compliance is just a specification in disguise. Without a meaningful certification process the ebook products that people can buy will follow the defacto standard set by adobe just as in the early days of PCs the standard for PC compatibility wasn't MS-DOS, but rather Lotus 1-2-3 and Flight simulator. If it ran those, it was deemed PC compatible and it stayed that way until MS finally asserted their control with MS-DOS 5. ("DOS ain't done until Lotus won't run", says the legend.) Regardless of what the standards body says, in real world terms, adobe controls epub: If it won't display properly in ADE, it isn't "proper" epub in the eyes of the buying public. And since every eReader supporting ePub with DRM uses adobe code, everything else is up the creek; pay adobe its fees or try to convince the customers that the inconsistencies that *will* arise aren't your fault. Heck, even licensing from adobe won't prevent that; just ask the folks with Hanlin-based readers... Last edited by fjtorres; 10-26-2009 at 02:03 PM. |
10-26-2009, 02:10 PM | #13 | |
Zealot
Posts: 138
Karma: 372
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: New York, NY
Device: Sony PRS-600, Nook Color, iPad
|
Quote:
- Ed |
|
10-26-2009, 04:03 PM | #14 | ||||
New York Editor
Posts: 6,384
Karma: 16540415
Join Date: Aug 2007
Device: PalmTX, Pocket eDGe, Alcatel Fierce 4, RCA Viking Pro 10, Nexus 7
|
Quote:
Since the products which implement standards are sold for money, there is a lengthy and highly political process involved in making something a standard. Various players in whichever industry will say "We're all in favor of standards. Do it our way!". Depending upon the standard being hammered out, there may be several incompatible approaches being put forward. In some cases, companies have made bets that their approach, or something close too it, will be anointed as the standard, and have shipped prodcuts based on it, so the stakes can be high. Quote:
This is not something any certification process such as you advocate can address. Quote:
The market does the policing here. If the informal test is "It looks as expected in Adobe Digital Editions", it's my responsibility as a content producer to create ePub files that do. If I am a device manufacturer or software developer, it's my responsibility to make a device or write software that will do the job the same as Adobe Digital Editions to the extent possible, so differences are those imposed by the underlying hardware. Content that isn't displayable on any specs confirming device, and devices that don't properly conform to the spec will get weeded out soon enough because people won't buy them. The biggest issue with any spec are the gray areas that are open to interpretation as to just what you should do in a particular case. Look at any discussion of the specs for the C and C++ languages, and how various compilers have chosen to implement the specs for good examples of the issues involved. And no, that informal compatibility test didn't come to an end when Microsoft asserted control in MS-DOS 5. The issues involved had little to do with MS-DOS and everything to do with hardware. While you technically could do hardware access through the BIOS and MS-DOS, most software vendors wrote directly to the hardware for performance reasons. The informal "runs Lotus and Flight Simulator" test was primarily for video display, and become less relevant as PC manufacturers began making hardware that was compatible, with BIOSes that were likewise. Once upon a time Compaq was the gold standard for IBM-PC compatibility, and could charge a price premium because you could expect it to be compatible with with genuine IBM kit. MS didn't truly assert dominance until Windows. Windows was multi-tasking, and you pretty much had to do everything through the OS. You couldn't assume, as you could in MS-DOS days, that your program had sole control of the machine and could talk directly to the hardware when it ran. As of Windows NT, the OS became positively surly if programmers tried to bypass it. (I was around back then, and have fond () memories of when the IBM PC was first becoming popular in corporate America, displacing Apple ][s running VisiCalc, and Lotus 1,2,3 was forcing everyone to upgrade to a whole <gasp!> 640K of RAM to accommodate enormous Lotus spreadsheets.) Quote:
It's not in Adobe's interest to play games with the spec. They are a B2B outfit. They make their money licensing stuff like this. They want a spec everyone can adhere to. If someone chooses to bypass them and create their own software to produce or display ePub files, that's not going to kill Adobe. They are betting it will be faster and cheaper for most folks to license their code than to roll their own, and mostly, they'll be right. And sorry about Hanlin, but simply licensing code from another party doesn't mean I will successfully implement that code on my hardware. ______ Dennis Last edited by DMcCunney; 10-26-2009 at 04:05 PM. |
||||
10-26-2009, 06:16 PM | #15 |
Banned
Posts: 2,094
Karma: 2682
Join Date: Aug 2009
Device: N/A
|
ADE is the dominant render for handheld devices, sure. But if there's an open liscence program - and I sure haven't heard about anyone being refused a liscence - it dosn't even come close to Amazon's tactics.
Calibre displays non-DRM'ed ePub just fine without using ADE... |
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Engadget:Toshiba Shows off "Smart Pad" promises launch before October | kjk | News | 3 | 07-20-2010 07:18 PM |
Normal to see an Adobe logo "watermark" while charging? | rahulm | Sony Reader | 3 | 03-16-2009 04:24 AM |
Yahoo Music closing. Claims it will "compensate" customers for DRM | Alisa | News | 21 | 08-05-2008 08:55 AM |
Adobe Reader "Lite" Enterprise Edition saves disk space | Alexander Turcic | Reading and Management | 1 | 03-28-2006 06:37 PM |
Installing "Send to Palm" plug-in in Adobe Reader 6? | daught | Reading and Management | 8 | 06-02-2003 06:15 PM |