06-17-2010, 02:34 AM | #1 |
Dyslexic Count
Posts: 526
Karma: 5041991
Join Date: Aug 2008
Device: Palm TX, Advent Vega, iPad, iPod Touch, Kindle
|
Amazon patents social networking
Edit.
Last edited by dadioflex; 12-15-2010 at 04:59 PM. |
06-17-2010, 03:15 AM | #2 |
Paladin of Eris
Posts: 3,119
Karma: 20849349
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USAland
Device: Kindle 10
|
Isn't this like a good argument against software patents? Taking something that's been around for awhile lots of prior art and then getting a patent to extort other companies into doing your bidding and keeping new ones from coming in and competing.
|
Advert | |
|
06-17-2010, 04:31 AM | #3 |
Enthusiast
Posts: 26
Karma: 10
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Oklahoma
Device: Oasis, Aura One, Lumi
|
It might be a good argument, but since the US Patent office has issued patents on the cellular structure of living organisms since 1980 I do not think we can rely on "common sense" to reign them in.
I could rant on patenting business plans too. |
06-17-2010, 08:08 AM | #4 |
Connoisseur
Posts: 84
Karma: 56
Join Date: May 2010
Device: none
|
Slow day at the Amazon legal department I see. This has nothing to do with technology. I seem to recall the last idiotic patent they tried to pull off was the one-click checkout.
|
06-17-2010, 08:11 AM | #5 |
Author
Posts: 203
Karma: 1164907
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: Kindle Oasis
|
As a student I thought of patenting the letter "E". Wish I'd done it now!
|
Advert | |
|
06-17-2010, 08:21 AM | #6 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
|
1- If the Patent was just *granted* then it was submitted a long time ago, maybe even before Facebook came out.
2- Patents are for specific ideas and methods of doing things, not general, vague ideas. There might actually be no conflict. After all, Amazon does have a lot of social networking features in their website (and Kindle) but they are all intended for sales and support, not for comunication. While some companies and celebrities are using Facebook for marketting, most people use it as a communications tool. 3- The people most opposed to patents/copyrights are the ones that never created anything of value in their lives. |
06-17-2010, 08:28 AM | #7 | |
Da'i
Posts: 1,144
Karma: 1217499
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Baltimore
Device: Toshiba Thrive, Kobo Touch, Kindle 1, Aluratek Libre, T-Mobile Comet
|
Quote:
Luqman |
|
06-17-2010, 08:38 AM | #8 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
|
|
06-17-2010, 09:03 AM | #9 |
Hi There!
Posts: 7,473
Karma: 2930523
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Device: iPad
|
|
06-17-2010, 09:51 AM | #10 |
Guru
Posts: 820
Karma: 11012
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Device: Bookeen Cybook
|
Well, Microsoft has patents for double-click: http://www.newscientist.com/article/...ng-patent.html
Patents have been a joke before I was born... |
06-17-2010, 09:55 AM | #11 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 9,707
Karma: 32763414
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Krewerd
Device: Pocketbook Inkpad 4 Color; Samsung Galaxy Tab S6
|
|
06-17-2010, 11:14 AM | #12 |
Curmudgeon
Posts: 3,085
Karma: 722357
Join Date: Feb 2010
Device: PRS-505
|
A lot of people are forgetting the original purpose of patents.
The original idea was to spread knowledge and ensure it wasn't lost. Prior to patents, a lot of devices, processes, and so on, were trade secrets, especially in the days of the guilds. That's why people are still trying to re-invent things like the way Antonio Stradivari treated the wood for his violins, for example. The patent was a trade-off: You tell everyone how you did it, and in exchange, you get a short-term monopoly on doing it that way. If Stradivari had been able to patent what made a Stradivarius violin so special, violin makers might still be making them today. And with the information in the patent being public, other inventors could further develop it. Somewhere along the line, this got warped into the idea that the first person (or, far more often, corporation) to get to the patent office has a moral right to a monopoly on the use of their idea -- no matter what it is. Patents were turned from a tool for the dissemination and preservation of technological knowledge into a weapon of corporate warfare. Patents are granted on things that do not "promote the progress of science and the useful arts" in any way, which are not only obvious to a person with ordinary knowledge of their field (which is supposed to be the standard) but to the average layman with little knowledge of that field (but more, apparently, than most patent examiners), and are used primarily as a way for corporations to destroy smaller (and quite possibly more inventive) rivals. Take Amazon and the one-click patent: Was that a non-obvious idea? No. Was it something that would be lost if not preserved and made available to all future inventors? Hell no. It's a "process", yes, but only in the simplest terms, not in the sense of the process of treating the wood for the world's best musical instruments. It's a concept. It's something that anyone who knows it exists can duplicate. So it would not be lost to the ages without a patent. Nor is it something that Amazon would not have created without a monopoly on its use; there is no more incentive required to encourage the creation of a "buy this thing" button in online stores than there is to encourage the placement of cash registers in brick-and-mortar stores. The purpose of patents is not to benefit the patent-holder. It's to benefit everyone else, and the benefit to the patent-holder is the compensation for the loss of secrecy that benefits society as a whole. It is not, or at least was not intended, to be a weapon for those patent-holders to cause widespread harm and disrupt, rather than promote, progress. |
06-17-2010, 11:22 AM | #13 | |
.
Posts: 3,408
Karma: 5647231
Join Date: Oct 2008
Device: never enough
|
Quote:
|
|
06-17-2010, 12:02 PM | #14 | |
Wizard
Posts: 4,293
Karma: 529619
Join Date: May 2007
Device: iRex iLiad, DR800SG
|
Quote:
|
|
06-17-2010, 02:37 PM | #15 |
Curmudgeon
Posts: 3,085
Karma: 722357
Join Date: Feb 2010
Device: PRS-505
|
Exactly like copyright.
Neither one was created to protect some writer's or inventor's existing moral rights to a monopoly on their stuff. They legislatively created such a privilege (not a right) to reward the creators for sharing their stuff. That's what nobody gets. |
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Anyone using the Social networking feature | ylsul | Amazon Kindle | 6 | 08-30-2010 06:13 PM |
Social Networking and Twitter: NO THANK YOU | hidari | Lounge | 39 | 06-14-2010 11:49 AM |
Firmware Update 2.5 Update social networking features | tomsem | Amazon Kindle | 8 | 04-30-2010 02:09 PM |
Top social networking sites for promoting your book? | Steven Lake | Writers' Corner | 14 | 03-04-2010 09:20 PM |
Social networking? | rahlquist | News | 7 | 08-25-2009 09:15 PM |