05-08-2012, 12:10 PM | #121 |
Member
Posts: 21
Karma: 338
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Western Alaska
Device: nook Touch Glow; Kindle Paperwhite 2
|
I just got the NTG yesterday and read for the first time last night. With the NST I used a MightyBright clip on light and while it worked well, it tended to light up the room to a certain extent. With the glowlight only the screen is illuminated. Although the DW never complained about the MightyBright, I think she likes the NTG better.
So for me, it was worth the upgrade just for that part. But then I'm a gadget hound so I probably would have upgraded anyway. And the contrast while noticeable is not a factor for me and the NTG is perfectly readable. |
05-08-2012, 03:29 PM | #122 |
Enthusiast
Posts: 40
Karma: 501252
Join Date: Jan 2011
Device: Nook Simple Touch
|
I ended up exchanging my Glowlight nook for the standard version. The light itself worked good and I can see how it would be perfect for some people, but personally, the loss of sharpness and contrast compared to my Kindle 3 (which I'm giving to a friend) bothered me too much. Even if both Nook models were the same price, I would prefer the slightly increased clarity of the non-lit one to the convenience of a built-in light.
I do love my new non-lit Nook though. |
Advert | |
|
05-08-2012, 04:25 PM | #123 | |
Award-Winning Participant
Posts: 7,310
Karma: 67564074
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NJ, USA
Device: Kindle
|
Quote:
|
|
05-08-2012, 07:53 PM | #124 |
Zealot
Posts: 122
Karma: 52
Join Date: Nov 2008
Device: none
|
So I ended up taking mine back. I was reading one night and I noticed a slight scratch in the screen in one spot and a little spot as well. The only time you notice it is when the light is on and it is almost like a light brides missing a piece e.g.; the light shines through the scratch and spot. It wasn't always noticeable but for a new device, I should have a flawless screen. I am fairly certain didn't cause the scratches, even though I didn't notice it right away. It was in a case when not in use.
The question is, has anyone noticed the screen protector is MORE susceptible to scratches? I really liked it but am sticking with my Kindle touch with lighted case until I hear more responses. Last edited by nremondelli; 05-08-2012 at 11:17 PM. |
05-08-2012, 08:28 PM | #125 |
Connoisseur
Posts: 83
Karma: 888
Join Date: May 2010
Device: Nook Touch, iPad1, iPad2, iPod Touch 4G, Pixel Qi
|
What will happen if the screen protector is removed to increase contrast?
|
Advert | |
|
05-08-2012, 09:40 PM | #126 |
Member
Posts: 21
Karma: 338
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Western Alaska
Device: nook Touch Glow; Kindle Paperwhite 2
|
You would likely loose the even lighting. The screen protector serves two purposes - 1. to protect the screen and 2. to distribute the light from the leds evenly across the screen. One of the Gizmodo editors dropped something on his NTG and the spot where it hit now has a bright area where the light is "leaking".
http://gizmodo.com/5907053/you-reall...ouch/gallery/1 |
05-08-2012, 09:52 PM | #127 |
eReader
Posts: 60
Karma: 31585
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Southern California
Device: Sony 650, iPod Touch 4G, iPhone 4, Nook: Touch/Glow/Color/Tablet
|
I think you'll find that the 'screen protector' is the light distribution device; there must be one and I'll bet that's it.
I have both 'Touches' and never thought the original needed an anti-glare screen. I have them on my Nook color & tablet but have seen no need for them on any of the eink readers I have owned. If the 'screen protector' is easily scratched with the result that reading is severely affected, then, maybe the GL isn't so great after all. I am concerned that this may be true. If it is, I'll take mine back within the 15-day money back window. I like it a lot but not that much. Tomorrow I'll see if I get hold of someone at B&N. Joe |
05-09-2012, 06:45 AM | #128 |
Gadgetoholic
Posts: 1,462
Karma: 2731820
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Sweden
Device: Kobo Libra2, Tolino Vision 6
|
Well, it' really can't be called a "screen protector" unless it actually protects the screen. can it?!
And of course it therefor needs to be replacemable. Is it? If not, then it's not for me. Bummer! |
05-09-2012, 08:10 AM | #129 |
Groupie
Posts: 182
Karma: 346596
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Device: Nook simple touch, iPad 2
|
As far as I know it is not a screen protector at all, it is an antiglare coating/layer. It isn's something removable. It is there so that when the glow light is on there isn't just a massive amount of glare all over the screen because of the angle of the glow lights.
|
05-09-2012, 09:15 AM | #130 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,075
Karma: 62739845
Join Date: Feb 2009
Device: Kobo Glo HD
|
Quote:
"Built-in, anti-glare screen protector for crisp, clear reading - even in bright sun" |
|
05-09-2012, 10:18 AM | #131 |
Gadgetoholic
Posts: 1,462
Karma: 2731820
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Sweden
Device: Kobo Libra2, Tolino Vision 6
|
Yeah, their marketing of this stinks! It's not a "screen protector" at all, but rather an anti-glare coating (that lessens contrast) that in no way at all protects the screen!
|
05-09-2012, 11:26 AM | #132 |
Book and Gadget Fan
Posts: 199
Karma: 19698
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NJ, USA
Device: Nooks GL3, ST w/GL, Color, HD+; Kindles Voyage & Paperwhite; PE, EE
|
I received mine on Monday, and am quite happy with it. I am taking note of the concerns about the glowlight layer being potentially delicate, and just being cautious. I plan to keep mine and am hoping for the best!
|
05-09-2012, 12:10 PM | #133 | |
Award-Winning Participant
Posts: 7,310
Karma: 67564074
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NJ, USA
Device: Kindle
|
Quote:
Perhaps this new thing is part of the casing or separate internal piece which could be replaced more cheaply at the repair center. So it might be a screen protector after all, just a fragile, non-user-replaceable, multi-function one.... ApK |
|
05-09-2012, 01:11 PM | #134 |
Gadgetoholic
Posts: 1,462
Karma: 2731820
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Sweden
Device: Kobo Libra2, Tolino Vision 6
|
|
05-09-2012, 05:40 PM | #135 |
Junior Member
Posts: 7
Karma: 10
Join Date: May 2008
Device: Cybook Gen3
|
Wow!!
I've had a trusty Cybook Gen3 since they first came out...I think late 2007. Great e-ink display and has done well through hundreds of ebooks. I've also used a Kindle, a Sony and a Cybook Orizon.
Just received my Nook Simple Touch with Glow Light and it is a Wow!!! Everything first rate including the Wi-Fi, screen, controls, user friendly interface and outstanding battery life even using the light, which is excellent. Can't hardly put the thing down!! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ConsumerReport: E-book readers: Nook Simple Touch tops Kindle Touch | afv011 | Barnes & Noble NOOK | 4 | 11-22-2011 03:39 PM |
A Kindle, Kobo Touch, Nook Simple Touch or something else? | David732 | Which one should I buy? | 4 | 10-26-2011 12:31 AM |
Kindle 4th gen non touch vs Nook Simple Touch | shinew | Which one should I buy? | 8 | 10-07-2011 09:10 PM |
Kindle 3, Nook Simple Touch, Kobo Touch and Libra Pro Touch | jbcohen | Which one should I buy? | 4 | 06-18-2011 07:58 PM |
Pre-ordering Nook Simple Touch or Kobo Touch? | SilentDuck | Which one should I buy? | 27 | 05-29-2011 05:27 PM |