05-08-2009, 06:07 PM | #1 |
Guru
Posts: 612
Karma: 7511929
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: New York, NY
Device: Amazon Kindle Paperwhite 2
|
On why DRM ebooks are good!
I disagree with many people's desire to do away with DRM on ebooks. This isn't communist China. Property rights actual mean something. When was the last time an important innovation came out of China (before and after communism)? I would say that DRM is absolutely essential to a successful future with ebooks. DRM is needed to stop the parasites from stealing people’s hard work. Entrepreneurs and inventors do not start businesses when they know people can steal their products and services willy nilly. It is very short sighted to want to get rid of DRM.
Let's say u r a novelist like Stephen King and u spend 6 months writing a book. You publish the book online DRM free in PDF and charge people upon purchase through a website like Amazon, etc. Very soon this book will end up on the file sharing services. It will be emailed among people that know each other. King will get much less for his work. Why would someone put all that effort into something if they know people can steal it so easily? I don't think the creators should HAVE to rely on the good intentions of others to make a buck. They aren't running charities. Do a thought experiment…imagine that all people in the US has the sony reader and all people had access to file sharing programs. What would happen to a DRM free book once it is published? This is the thought experiment you should run any time u think DRM free books is a good idea. Look at the music industry. MP3 has greatly reduced music sales and hurt many people. There is also probably much less innovation there as well. With books it will be ever worse because there is no “live performance” to make money on. The intellectual property is the only product. This argument goes down to something very fundamental and important, something in the US constitutions….that is property rights. The right to control property…physical and intangible…to make a living off of your hard work. Imagine a world without property rights, starting in 1900. A communist utopia by 2000? The USSR surely wasn’t. We would essentially have to rely on the government for innovations. I’m not even going to get into why socialism is a bad political/economic system…would take too long. Would we have the PC, laptop, iphone, mp3 music player, Prius, Mac, Windows, consumer electronics, HD DVD, gourmet food for mass consumption, dvds, mobile phones…etc. |
05-08-2009, 06:20 PM | #2 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,452
Karma: 7185064
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Linköpng, Sweden
Device: Kindle Voyage, Nexus 5, Kindle PW
|
Maybe you should read all the other threads here that have discussed this a lot so you know the arguments and do not disregard them in your text.
|
Advert | |
|
05-08-2009, 06:50 PM | #3 |
Zealot
Posts: 136
Karma: 244
Join Date: Aug 2007
Device: Kobo Glo
|
I have to agree with tompe, most of the arguments you raise have been discussed many many times already. Perhaps you should respond in one of the threads that already exist on the topic.
However your main argument is incredibly flawed. DRM doesn't stop piracy. Are you aware that most popular books and many many not so popular books are already out there to download from the darknet? Even books that haven't been released in electronic form are available. People scan, proofread and upload books for others to download. The Harry Potter books are all available for example. And what about drm removal tools? They render drm effectively useless. It's incredibly easy to remove the drm on protected pdf, epub and mobi files. If in your example King released his book with drm it would be trivial to remove it and copy it as many times as you wanted. And even if some new form of drm was used that was uncrackable, all that would happen is that someone would scan and proofread a hard copy and upload that. DRM doesn't stop piracy, all it does is make it difficult for honest customers to make use of their purchases. Having said all this I'm not even sure if your being serious Especially given your question on Chinese innovations. I mean seriously? They invented paper, gunpowder, the compass, printing and many many other technological firsts. |
05-08-2009, 11:45 PM | #4 |
Wearer of Pants
Posts: 1,050
Karma: 7634
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Norman, OK
Device: Amazon Kindle DX / iPhone
|
What everyone else said. You're quite big on pronouncements. Your info is not at all... adequate or sufficiently describes the situation (i.e. mp3s).
|
05-09-2009, 12:00 AM | #5 |
curmudgeon
Posts: 1,481
Karma: 5748190
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Redwood City, CA USA
Device: Kobo Aura HD, (ex)nook, (ex)PRS-700, (ex)PRS-500
|
@markbot: It may be important to note that DRM and property rights are two quite different things. I make my living in an industry that depends quite fundamentally on intellectual property (the software industry). I thoroughly support the basic idea of IP (although I have some quibbles about the current implementation of that idea here in the US). In fact, I don't have any music, ebooks, or software that was not acquired entirely legitimately -- it's all squeaky-clean legal.
But DRM is a whole different thing. It interferes with my traditional fair-use rights. It is an attempt to prevent me from format-shifting (for music or ebooks). It seems to be used far more as a way to lock me in to a particular family of hardware (for eBook readers), rather than to protect the IP rights of authors and publishers. It's a pain-in-the-butt... and it totally fails its supposed goal! Any form of encryption that depends on the end user having a copy of the key is fundamentally incapable of preventing that end-user from decrypting the content. (Think about that statement for a moment...) Now, go visit the good folks over at Baen Books and Webscriptions. They have a thriving business selling eBooks. With no DRM anywhere in sight! They don't do things that way out of the goodness of their hearts (or because they're against property rights), but rather because it helps them make more money. In fact, they make a very strong case that having the right business model protects the IP far better than does DRM. Certainly their sales results with this approach have been fantastic. For today's homework , do a forum search on DRM and on Copyright and read the many posts that have gone before. You'll find tons of people here who fully support property rights and IP, but who find DRM an abomination rather than a good thing. A one-screen summary of the best argued pros and cons on DRM will get you a good grade. Extra points available for digging up the sales info for Baen and Webscriptions. Double extra credit if you find the links to a longer and well-written discussion of copyright issues by one of Baen's leading authors. Xenophon (Can you tell I've been spending too much time in academia?) |
Advert | |
|
05-09-2009, 12:01 AM | #6 | |
Resident Curmudgeon
Posts: 73,931
Karma: 128903250
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Roslindale, Massachusetts
Device: Kobo Libra 2, Kobo Aura H2O, PRS-650, PRS-T1, nook STR, PW3
|
Quote:
|
|
05-09-2009, 01:56 AM | #7 | |||||||
Addict
Posts: 285
Karma: 640696
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Perth, Australia
Device: Kindle Touch 3G, HP Touchpad (Android), Samsung Omnia 7
|
Quote:
DRM causes no problems for pirates. This is the big flaw in your entire argument. DRM can be circumvented very easily. Once one copy of Carrie is cracked and uploaded to the web, everyone can get a copy. I'm not condoning this, but this is what happens. But DRM does cause many problems for legitimate users/buyers of media: For example, people who own iPods and bought music for years that will only work via iPods and iTunes. These people can either pay more money to 'upgrade' their music to the new DRM-free format or be stuck with using Apple products for as long as they want to use that music (or video for that matter). They can't buy a different brand of MP3 player or use different computer software to access their legally bought music. And what if iTunes closes down permanently, like a few DRM-using sites have recently? That music becomes unusable. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Most people are honest. The dishonest ones can, and will, pirate their content with or without DRM. Those who are honest and happy to pay for content are hindered by DRM, and thus may choose to either pirate content or ignore it completely. Quote:
Quote:
You're right that musicians have the cash stream of live performances, t-shirts, etc. They can to some extent afford to give away music as a marketing tool. Authors can't really do this. Quote:
Ultimately the world of media is changing. There is money to be made there, and if companies are smart they will do things in such a way as to make a good profit while paying the artists. Since I personally will not buy content with DRM, all my money will go to companies and artists who are happy to let me play my digital content on whatever devices I want. There are free alternatives to most media, and in many cases the free (both in terms of cost and DRM-free) is as good as or better than the overpriced, protected (i.e.defective) products. How did you hear about your favourite authors? How did your favourite music become your favourite? For me, I found my favourite authors by borrowing library books or by being given second-hand books when I was younger. I found my favourite bands by hearing them on the radio or borrowing a friend's CD or taping my brothers' LPs. That is, I had free access to this material so I could 'sample' it before deciding if I liked it. I now buy music and books by authors who I would never have been exposed to without 'free samples'. There are big problems for artists and publishers going into the digital age, there's no doubt about it, but locking people out of digital files is not the solution to these problems. It not only punishes the paying customers, but it could actually pave the way for pirates to start making big money from the DRM-free files. |
|||||||
05-09-2009, 02:08 AM | #8 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 9,707
Karma: 32763414
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Krewerd
Device: Pocketbook Inkpad 4 Color; Samsung Galaxy Tab S6
|
I have downloaded games (from the darknet) to finally end up buying it because I liked it. Had I not been able to "pre-play" it, I would never have bought it.
I have downloaded music files (from the darknet) to finally end up buying all the CD's from that artist. Had I not downloaded it, I probably had never heard of that artist and I wouldn't have bought all those CD's. I have downloaded books (from the darknet) to finally end up buying (if available) the electronic form. The same reason, it was from an author I had never heard about, or thought I'd not enjoy. I read somewhere that most of the books floating around the darknet are never read by the person that download them. Most downloaders tend to be collectors. They would never have bought the books, even if they weren't available as illegal download. About DRM: in the Netherlands, you are allowed to make copies of music, movies and literary work for your own, non-commercial use. How does DRM fit in with that? |
05-09-2009, 02:19 AM | #9 | |
Addict
Posts: 285
Karma: 640696
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Perth, Australia
Device: Kindle Touch 3G, HP Touchpad (Android), Samsung Omnia 7
|
Quote:
1) Piracy can't be stopped 2) DRM hurts only the legitimate customers No amount of DRM can stop pirated copies getting out into the wild. These companies should turn the tables and put out high quality media that will turn pirates into purchasers and fans. Take Neil Gaiman and Cory Doctorow, two authors who have made a lot of their material freely available online. I have a read a bit of Doctorow's free stuff and will now probably go out and buy his stuff in future. I got a free book from Jeffrey Carver from a link he posted to this site. I haven't read it yet, but it looks like it will be a great read, and if it is, I will be more than happy to pay full price for the next book of his I read. Contrast that with two books I badly want to read but can't find in a DRM-free format...(The Stories of English and Banana)...I would pay any reasonable price for DRM-free copies of these books, but the publishers have chosen not to make the product available to me. So I will read something that I can get a hold of and save my money for an artist or publisher who respects me and their artists. |
|
05-09-2009, 04:07 AM | #10 | |
Still Easily Confused
Posts: 889
Karma: 505319
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Hampshire/Berkshire/Surrey - yes I am that big
Device: Kindle
|
Quote:
MP3 can be purchased at greatly reduced prices compared to say a CD or other form of recording (I am old enough to still have a record collection). My question is, is this a reduction in the price of the MP3 or the marketplace setting a price they are prepared to pay for the product? I have a young nephew who will look at the music and movie sites and has a clear idea in his mind about what he thinks is a fair price and what isn't - if its overpriced in his mind he won't purchase. We are seeing a change in how we all purchase and have goods delivered. Traditional marketplaces like those serviced by the record companies and publishers are changing and evolving. The traditional companies need to embrace these new channels or face extinction. DRM is just a ploy to try to hang on to some old, useless DNA. Pev PS I own a software and services business and we provide all of pur product copy protection (drm) free to enable our clients to manage their business and supply chain. If we don't offer them the service they requrie they can easily take our products (may include source) and use another supplier. |
|
05-09-2009, 04:15 AM | #11 | |
Addict
Posts: 285
Karma: 640696
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Perth, Australia
Device: Kindle Touch 3G, HP Touchpad (Android), Samsung Omnia 7
|
Quote:
Most people will be happy to pay a reasonable price for media, but the content producers are trying to use DRM to keep their often artificially high prices at a certain level. These companies shouldn't underestimate the difference in value (from the consumer's perspective) between a digital file and a physical object. |
|
05-09-2009, 06:30 AM | #12 |
Chocolate Grasshopper ...
Posts: 27,600
Karma: 20821184
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Scotland
Device: Muse HD , Cybook Gen3 , Pocketbook 302 (Black) , Nexus 10: wife has PW
|
When my current book reader dies (hopefully not for a few years yet!) DRM will prevent me from loading my books onto a replacement, for my own use.
That is good ? why ? |
05-09-2009, 08:28 AM | #13 | |
Addict
Posts: 285
Karma: 640696
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Perth, Australia
Device: Kindle Touch 3G, HP Touchpad (Android), Samsung Omnia 7
|
Quote:
(I'm being sarcastic, of course). Out of curiosity, how many people here share books and/or read the same books as friends and family? I don't really share tastes with friends and family when it comes to books. Music, TV, and films to some extent, but not books. |
|
05-09-2009, 08:58 AM | #14 |
Crazy like a
Posts: 229
Karma: 2368978
Join Date: May 2009
Device: Sony PRS-T1, Sony PRS-350
|
I have a couple of comments about file sharing in general.
A fear of technology seems to be relevant here. Sharing printed books with friends and family isn't regarded as piracy. Borrowing a printed book from someone - stealing the content - is perfectly fine. We're told that pulling the same book from a torrent and reading it in your reader is different. The objection will be raised that torrents involve much higher numbers, but it's not relevant. You can let 500 or 5000+ friends read your printed book and no one will threaten to sue, not even the publishers. If piracy is wrong then so are traditional libraries. |
05-09-2009, 10:11 AM | #15 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,452
Karma: 7185064
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Linköpng, Sweden
Device: Kindle Voyage, Nexus 5, Kindle PW
|
I do it a lot. Among people reading science fiction at least it is very common to lend and borrow books among friends.
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Do you avoid DRM ebooks? | jrchase | Amazon Kindle | 38 | 04-05-2011 12:37 AM |
eBooks ohne DRM | SpecialEd | E-Books | 10 | 10-19-2010 08:48 PM |
Will DRM on ebooks go the way of iTunes | davers | General Discussions | 18 | 04-15-2010 10:50 AM |
Old pdf ebooks w/drm | AJ Starr | 8 | 07-26-2009 05:09 PM | |
DRM is necessary and good, stop complaining | markbot | Amazon Kindle | 225 | 01-24-2008 03:13 PM |