01-13-2014, 01:18 AM | #1 |
Junior Member
Posts: 5
Karma: 10
Join Date: Mar 2009
Device: none
|
Any non-touch e-book readers?
I have an aging Sony PRS-505 and one of the main reasons I have not upgraded is that I like the buttons and the fact they keep my greasy fingers off the screen. Are there any current e-book readers that are not touch based, or have decent buttons for page flipping? One thing I really love about the 505 is that the PRS+ enhancements give me 3 different buttons that can turn the page which is great for holding it in a variety of positions.
My list of absolute requirements are pretty slim: Calibre and EPUB compatible, an e-ink screen, and buttons to flip pages. |
01-13-2014, 04:02 AM | #2 |
Guru
Posts: 729
Karma: 3822612
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Sweden
Device: Paperwhite 2, Kobo Aura H2O
|
There are a few with both touch and buttons. Bookeens readers http://www.bookeen.com/en/cybook Sony's T-line (doesn't have frontlight), Pocketbook http://www.pocketbook-int.com/us Onyx boox readers https://onyx-boox.com/ So there are a few to choose from. The fact is though that as long as you have dry hands you really don't see that much fingerprints on a touch screen.
|
01-13-2014, 04:36 AM | #3 |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
Agreed. I have quite greasy skin, but, unlike my iPhone and iPad (which are fingerprint magnets), fingerprints just don't show up at all on the matte surface of an eInk device.
|
01-13-2014, 07:57 AM | #4 |
Wizard
Posts: 3,025
Karma: 11196738
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Piper College
Device: Samsung A21
|
Amazon's entry level kindle is a non-touch. However since the sony readers are the ones that you know, and you have built up a level of comfortability with I would think that it would make sense to buy a newer Sony. I am not familiar with sony's current offerings but I would be suprised if sony did not offer any entry level no touch reader.
|
01-13-2014, 08:09 AM | #5 |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
Sony don't make any non-touch readers.
|
01-13-2014, 11:48 AM | #6 |
Junior Member
Posts: 5
Karma: 10
Join Date: Mar 2009
Device: none
|
Very interesting and good to know. I based most of my fingerprint worry on my tablet and phone so I thought they would severely interfere with a nice long reading session.
|
01-13-2014, 11:51 AM | #7 |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
No, it's totally different. Although I must say that even on my iPad, which looks a complete mess when it's turned off - looks like a mirror covered in fingerprints - they're completely invisible when the device is actually in use. Do you find that you can actually see the fingerprints when using it?
|
01-13-2014, 11:54 AM | #8 | |
Junior Member
Posts: 5
Karma: 10
Join Date: Mar 2009
Device: none
|
Quote:
|
|
01-13-2014, 12:59 PM | #9 |
Brash Fumbler
Posts: 1,135
Karma: 8290493
Join Date: May 2013
Device: NST, Kobo Mini
|
Of course, Barnes and Noble is still selling the original Simple Touch. It has buttons, plus expandable memory. No problem side-loading books.
I like mine so much I bought a spare. They're currently going for $59. I've used mine every day for two years and it's still going strong. |
01-13-2014, 02:31 PM | #10 |
Wizard
Posts: 1,731
Karma: 3472866
Join Date: Apr 2008
Device: Sony PRS-650 & 350; Kindle Voyage; Kobo Aura HD, Aura One, and Forma
|
The newer Sonys are touch-enabled, but still have page turn buttons. The newest model, the T3 isn't available in the US, so depending on where you are that might or might not be an option--and unfortunately PRS+ won't work on it either. I think the last Sony models that you can use PRS+ on are the 350/650/950s.
I agree with the others though--fingerprints aren't a problem on the e-ink touch screens. I don't notice them on my Kindle PW2 or on my Sony 350/650s. I have to admit I would prefer an option for page turn buttons, but I like the touch interface for accessing menus, dictionary lookup, etc. If I had to choose (which I did) between page turn buttons on a non-touch interface and no page turn buttons with a touch screen, the touch screen would definitely win out. |
01-13-2014, 04:12 PM | #11 |
Wizard
Posts: 1,451
Karma: 1550000
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Maryland, USA
Device: Nook Simple Touch, HPC Evo 4G LTE
|
I would also point out that most touch readers (I believe with the exception of the current Kindle Paperwhite) use an IR technology that is very stylus friendly so you can use the touch functions without using your fingers.
That being said, a ziplock bag is no longer the best protection for them in the bath. -- Bill |
01-13-2014, 06:13 PM | #12 |
Guru
Posts: 748
Karma: 3942770
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Michigan, USA
Device: Kindle Fire, Kindle Paperwhite (Don't use Nook anymore)
|
I am constantly cleaning fingerprints off my iPad, but I don't have that problem with any e-ink reader I've had. The e-ink screens don't seem to attract smudges like tablets do. I don't know why.
And touch is a big deal for looking up words in the dictionary. It is SO easy to just touch the word to look it up. The Nook Simple Touch is really cheap and a nice e-reader. It has a touch screen AND buttons and has an SD slot. If you're looking for something cost effective, I would at least look in that direction. I know I'm repeating others - but I wanted to add my voice to the chorus. |
01-14-2014, 07:27 AM | #13 |
Wizard
Posts: 3,025
Karma: 11196738
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Piper College
Device: Samsung A21
|
Gee that's interesting harry. I thought that everyone made non touch readers.
|
01-14-2014, 07:31 AM | #14 |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
|
01-14-2014, 11:18 AM | #15 |
I ♥ Calibre
Posts: 2,073
Karma: 5678911
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis, Voyage, Sony PRS-350, Hudl2
|
Not quite, the two very latest ereaders from Kobo & Amazon (Aura & PW) both use capacitive touch screen. They've moved on from the infra-red their older touch screen models use (Kobo Glo/Touch & Kindle Touch) while the limited Aura HD still uses infra-red too. Nook didn't follow them with their updated Glowlight, but it'll be interesting to see if it leads to everyone else following suit in future.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Readers for Touch | johanp | PocketBook | 7 | 01-17-2013 04:44 AM |
ConsumerReport: E-book readers: Nook Simple Touch tops Kindle Touch | afv011 | Barnes & Noble NOOK | 4 | 11-22-2011 03:39 PM |
Touch-screen non-eInk readers? | rogue_ronin | Which one should I buy? | 20 | 08-01-2009 04:01 AM |
Use of HTML files in touch screen readers | AJ Starr | Workshop | 6 | 03-16-2009 06:54 PM |