12-30-2012, 06:27 PM | #16 |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
Only one word looked up in my latest book, "Childhood's End" by Arthur C. Clarke, and that was the word "seriatim". I thought I knew what it meant, but I looked it up just to be sure.
|
12-30-2012, 06:39 PM | #17 |
Fanatic
Posts: 565
Karma: 1113286
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Sunshine Coast Australia
Device: Kobo (RIP), iPad, iPhone 4, Kobo Touch x2, Kobo Glo
|
Harry my flippant reply was in response to BadBilly's comment which I felt was rather condescending to those who don't routinely use dictionaries while reading. I don't really pity those who use a dictionary - hence the smiley poking out its tongue.
I appreciate that there are many people who love nothing better than reading books full of obscure words however if I can't work out the meaning of a word from its context then I do question its use. Adjectives are difficult in a single usage but are you certain that the shape of this character's head is not described elsewhere in the book? There is the hint of "heavy-looking" in the same sentence but I would expect references to his height, long limbs, lankiness or perhaps the incongruity of a long head on a short fat body? If the character is important I would assume that his physical appearance (expecially if it were abnormal or unusual) would be alluded to more than once. If the character is minor and the shape of his head is not an integral part of the story then who cares? But that's just me... FYI you picked the worst possible word to challenge me - I have a degree in Medical Science and so I know that dolicho means long - it's used to describe several parts of the body that are longer than what is considered normal. Cephalic is in more common use so I would expect many if not most people to know it refers to the head. Put the two together and you have a long head. |
12-30-2012, 07:01 PM | #18 | |
Addict
Posts: 384
Karma: 1360936
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Quahog, RI
Device: Nook, Kindle PW4, Kobo Clara
|
Quote:
I think that using the dictionary is fine. As a matter of fact, I think not using it is lazy. And not reading a book because it has "big words" is kind of lazy too. I read all kinds of books, the airport thrillers to literature. I like to expose my brain to different kinds of writing styles |
|
12-30-2012, 07:05 PM | #19 |
Addict
Posts: 384
Karma: 1360936
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Quahog, RI
Device: Nook, Kindle PW4, Kobo Clara
|
|
12-30-2012, 07:27 PM | #20 |
Opsimath
Posts: 12,344
Karma: 187123287
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Chiang Mai, Northern Thailand
Device: Sony PRS-650, iPhone 5, Kobo Glo, Sony PRS-350, iPad, Samsung Galaxy
|
I always felt that communication was to share ideas or information. If a person chooses to use a word or words that the listener won't understand, that isn't clear communication to 'me.' When such a word is needed to clarify an idea or beautify the sounds of the writing, then of course its usage serves a definite purpose. But all too often it's just pretentious. I imagine we all know someone who will never use a small word when a big one will do, especially if they know the listener won't understand.
We all use dictionaries in our own ways to serve our own needs. I'm just glad that they are available to us! Stitchawl |
12-30-2012, 07:44 PM | #21 | |
Fanatic
Posts: 565
Karma: 1113286
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Sunshine Coast Australia
Device: Kobo (RIP), iPad, iPhone 4, Kobo Touch x2, Kobo Glo
|
Quote:
I too read a wide range of books books and my vocabulary is challenged at times. I could press the word with my finger and get an instant definition if I wanted. However I prefer to try to work out what a word means from the context of the sentence, paragraph, chapter, or novel (whatever it takes!) As I indicated earlier that's what I was taught to do when I learnt to read. Is that really being lazy? |
|
12-30-2012, 08:26 PM | #22 |
Home Guard
Posts: 4,729
Karma: 86721650
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Alpha Ralpha Boulevard
Device: Kindle Oasis 3G, iPhone 6
|
Usually I just read pop fiction but I also enjoy authors who write on a college reading level.
|
12-30-2012, 08:35 PM | #23 |
Enthusiast
Posts: 33
Karma: 478402
Join Date: Dec 2012
Device: Kindle Paperwhite
|
I use the dictionary a ton as I am currently deep into Stephen King's Dark Tower series, and he uses archaic and old English to a great extent. I think it definitely expands my vocabulary as well.
|
12-30-2012, 10:09 PM | #24 | |
Nodding at stupid things
Posts: 209
Karma: 4097046
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Toronto, Canada
Device: Sony T1, OnePlus 6, Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e, iPad Mini 2, PC
|
Quote:
Reading, to me, is a way to go places I haven't been, to open up new ideas. I read stuff that doesn't challenge my vocabulary much, if at all, but I also read things that stretch what I know. One can live one's entire life on the same block, never venturing beyond the familiar and some are quite happy to do so. I would find that stultifying, just as I'd find only reading things that never challenged me a sad existence. I also find the rather anti-intellectual view that anyone using words the reader doesn't already know is "pretentious" pitiably arrogant. Certainly there are authors who shouldn't be allowed near a thesaurus, those who try to inflate their work with less common words, who try to hide deficiencies in thought with dense verbiage. Still, I don't find that as objectionable as the attitude that "if I don't already know it, it isn't worth knowing." I know you didn't suggest this, Harley, but it has also been expressed in this thread. HarryT, in further reply to your original post, I've just found myself looking up a few words while reading The Stars My Destination by Alfred Bester: raffle: : rubbish; especially : a jumble or tangle of nautical equipment I was able to infer it from context, but was interested in this new meaning for a familiar word. puissant: having puissance : powerful Learned how to pronounce it as well as the definition. animalcule: a minute usually microscopic organism. That's a new one on me. I've read the paper version of this book a few times and I don't remember looking up any of those. I love this book and not looking those words up before didn't ruin it for me, put knowing them increases my appreciation for it. In 232 pages (paper), Bester delivers an epic tale with great economy. His choice of words helps this, conveying nuance and setting tone. |
|
12-30-2012, 10:21 PM | #25 |
Montreal wins Grey Cup!
Posts: 7,583
Karma: 31484197
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Raleigh, NC
Device: Paperwhite, Kindles 10 & 4 and jetBook Lite
|
When I was in high school or maybe college, I came to the conclusion that bad popular fiction was that which was quite easy to read but every once in a while used a word that I was completely unfamiliar with. It's my recollection that this idea came to me while I was reading Leslie Charteris.
It was my suspicion that he deliberately threw in the occasional head-scratcher to make the reader believe that he was a better and more sophisticated writer than the book would lead the reader to believe; and that the book was higher class than it was. |
12-30-2012, 10:55 PM | #26 |
Wizard
Posts: 2,776
Karma: 30081762
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: US
Device: ALL DEVICES ARE STOCK: Kobo Clara, Tolino Shine 2, Sony PRS-T3, T1
|
While I am often able to figure out what words mean by context, I do like being able to just press the word and find out for sure. Also, sometimes I wonder where a word came from, and look it up out of curiousity.
Also, my Sony reader has both American and British English dictionaries. It's great to be able to look up British slang. |
12-30-2012, 11:06 PM | #27 | |
Surfin the alpha waves ~~
Posts: 24,289
Karma: 459220161
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: New Jersey
Device: Jetbook Lite & Mini, Nook STR, Kobo, Hanvon N516, Kindle 2, Androids
|
Quote:
But I wouldn't have known what "dolichocephalic" meant -- and neither did Firefox's spellcheck. I almost never use a dictionary when I'm reading. On the other hand, I use one all the time when I'm writing. |
|
12-30-2012, 11:19 PM | #28 |
Wizard
Posts: 1,601
Karma: 9211856
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: kindle Oasis 2018, kindle 4 NT, kindle PW2, iPhone, iPad mini
|
It's pretty rare for me to run across a word I don't already know. But I did look up the word "susurrus" on my e-reader once. The other words I looked up turned out to be bad scans
Other memorable words I came across while reading were valetudinarian and eleemosynary. |
12-31-2012, 01:35 AM | #29 |
Martin Kristiansen
Posts: 1,546
Karma: 8480958
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Johannesburg
Device: Kindle International Ipad 2
|
I generally have my iPad within reach when reading and turn to dictionary.com when I need to look something up. The only time I use the Kindle on board dictionary is when I don't have Internet access
I fairly frequently look up mundane words as often there are nuances to meaning and I like to be certain. It's part of the entertainment of reading. In the old days it was quite tedious. I remember reading Earthly Powers and having to drag a dictionary around with me. Glad those days are over. |
12-31-2012, 01:50 AM | #30 | |
Opsimath
Posts: 12,344
Karma: 187123287
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Chiang Mai, Northern Thailand
Device: Sony PRS-650, iPhone 5, Kobo Glo, Sony PRS-350, iPad, Samsung Galaxy
|
Quote:
Stitchawl |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Touch Dictionary only looks up for English words | frankieGom | Kobo Reader | 6 | 12-09-2011 02:52 PM |
Can words in Kindle dictionary be pronounced in audio? | motorcyclist | Amazon Kindle | 6 | 06-22-2011 01:54 PM |
Words in your dictionary word log? | ardeegee | General Discussions | 11 | 06-16-2011 02:10 AM |
Kindle 3: Highlight and lookup the definitions for words not in dictionary? | ivanatpr | Amazon Kindle | 13 | 10-28-2010 09:54 AM |
apple rejected/then rates a dictionary as 17+ do to bad words | ahammer | News | 23 | 08-07-2009 11:51 AM |