07-23-2013, 06:44 AM | #151 |
Man Who Stares at Books
Posts: 1,816
Karma: 10606722
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: 50th State, USA. Also, PA, NY, CA, and elsewhere.
Device: All of the Above
|
From another blog on :
http://www.standard.co.uk/lifestyle/...m-8710726.html Of course, the benefit of hindsight is bringing out all kinds of claims of inside knowledge or prescience; Knight said last night that there were “clues everywhere” in the writing to the fact that Galbraith was a woman and that the book was not all it seemed. And what of the name “Robert Galbraith”? The words, if taken back to their Germanic and Gaelic origins, loosely translate as “famous stranger.” Galbraith may no longer be a stranger but he’s certainly famous. And, along with Rowling, he will be laughing all the way to the bank with the proceeds of his literary heist. It would have been more interesting if Rowling kept her identity secret until a literary analysis were performed, as was the case with Joe Klein and his book, Primary Colors. But, this is the summer reading season, and she (Rowling) was probably getting impatient with the slow sales. For those who have read the mystery novel, are there Rowling-isms within her book that would have helped you to identify the real author? |
07-23-2013, 08:07 AM | #152 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
|
Quote:
The book was selling *well* for what it is. "Quiet mystery" is actually a genre unto itself. Or sub-genre if you want to be precise. Those books sell about the way THE CUCKOO'S CALLING was selling. And 8600 copies total in three months is good sales for that genre. She was getting exactly what she wanted; a chance to write a book that could find its natural audience without the hysteria that accompanied THE CASUAL VACANCY. The reviews it got were free of Potter expectations, the buyers weren't buying it because it had her name on it; they were buying it because they appreciated quiet mysteries. The woman is worth north of a billion with a (permanent?) revenue stream in the tens to hundreds of millions without lifting a finger. If she says she wanted the Galbraith brand to be separate there is no reason to doubt *her*. The publisher? Yes. The agent? Maybe. But a fancy publicity scheme that relies on getting a lawyer to trash his career and reputation is going to cost a lot more than just putting it out under her name. Too much trouble and the return doesn't justify it as a scheme; not with that explanation. Seriously: if Rowling were that kind of money-grubber all she has to do is take a chunk of the Potter encyclopedia (all profits going to charity) turn it into a short story or novellete and sell it on Pottermore for $5-10. In one day, it would generate more money than the entire Galbraith series of mysteries could ever hope to produce. Either she really wanted to keep it separate from her Rowling brand or she wouldn't have bothered with tinfoil-hat schemes and gone straight for the money (Casual Vacancy!). She's the "victim" here; she gets a pile of money she doesn't need but her wishes for a quiet mystery writing career under a pseudonym is lost to her. Probably forever, unless she starts all over again from scratch with new characters and stories; a likely multiyear effort. Money can buy you many things but not lost time. That you never get back. |
|
Advert | |
|
07-23-2013, 09:37 AM | #153 |
Wizard
Posts: 1,820
Karma: 9503859
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: France
Device: (Sony (J) PRS 650), Kobo Mini, Kobo Glo HD
|
|
07-24-2013, 10:02 AM | #154 | ||
Interested Bystander
Posts: 3,725
Karma: 19728152
Join Date: Jun 2008
Device: Note 4, Kobo One
|
Quote:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/b...ive-novel.html Quote:
|
||
07-24-2013, 10:04 AM | #155 |
Interested Bystander
Posts: 3,725
Karma: 19728152
Join Date: Jun 2008
Device: Note 4, Kobo One
|
And there were probably lots of other manuscripts that would also have sold OK. They can't possibly publish them all.
It seems ridiculous to excoriate a publisher for deciding not to go with a book which it seems sold somewhere between 500 and 1500 copies before the author was 'outed'. |
Advert | |
|
07-24-2013, 10:57 AM | #156 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,452
Karma: 7185064
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Linköpng, Sweden
Device: Kindle Voyage, Nexus 5, Kindle PW
|
Quote:
The stated reason was that the book did not stand out. Also when publishing a new author you do not just look at the first book, you look at what can be developed in the continued relation between the author and the publisher. |
|
07-24-2013, 11:03 AM | #157 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,452
Karma: 7185064
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Linköpng, Sweden
Device: Kindle Voyage, Nexus 5, Kindle PW
|
Quote:
|
|
07-24-2013, 11:07 AM | #158 | ||
Interested Bystander
Posts: 3,725
Karma: 19728152
Join Date: Jun 2008
Device: Note 4, Kobo One
|
Quote:
Quote:
Or, as I've already said: "And there were probably lots of other manuscripts that would also have sold OK. They can't possibly publish them all." There is a limited number of titles that a publisher can release at once. Not every book can be published. That doesn't make them idiots. They will publish books that they think will sell well. Given books they think will sell equally well, they might make a decision based on genres they tend to support or avoid, or, ultimately, just on whether the particular person deciding happened to like the book or not. They passed on this book. If it hadn't come out that the author was JK Rowling, would they still have been so criticised for doing so? |
||
07-24-2013, 11:15 AM | #159 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,452
Karma: 7185064
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Linköpng, Sweden
Device: Kindle Voyage, Nexus 5, Kindle PW
|
Quote:
I totally agree with you that you cannot criticize the publishers that did not publish the book. |
|
07-24-2013, 11:22 AM | #160 | |
Award-Winning Participant
Posts: 7,316
Karma: 67862884
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NJ, USA
Device: Kindle
|
Quote:
But as to whether they would have been criticized if hadn't come out about JKR, we'll never know. Not many unknown names have runaway best sellers in the first few months of a new hard back, unless it's on some timely or sensational topic. So maybe this book by this Robert person would have started getting some momentum based on the positive reviews and decent sales, and would have done well enough to warrant some additional promotional dollars, and a paperback edition, and THEN word may have spread, and sales would have spiked, and everyone would look to who had turned it down and say "Fools for not seeing the future!" like they always do. Or maybe the just OK sales would have stayed just OK and no one would have cared one way or another, just like they always don't with the 99% of first books that DON'T become runaway best sellers. Last edited by ApK; 07-24-2013 at 11:26 AM. |
|
07-24-2013, 11:22 AM | #161 | |
Maria Schneider
Posts: 3,746
Karma: 26439330
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Austin, Texas
Device: 3g Kindle Keyboard
|
Quote:
This is true. When one of my books was being looked at by a trad publisher, I was asked to submit an outline and/or the first three chapters of the next book by two different publishers. They tend to look at an entire package/scenario and when it is a new author without a sales history, they want to know a lot of things: Does this person intend to write another in the series? How far along is that plan? Is the person reliable? How long will it take the author to write book 2, 3? Is the person easy to work with? It isn't all about the prose. Because there are a lot of good books that get submitted. Most of them have been "vetted" by an agent so the publisher isn't expecting to get bottom of the pile stuff. And even after that process of discussing books, and future books...there's a whole level of marketing that someone else talked about: How many books does a given publisher have in that genre? Is it a genre we want to continue to pursue? Do we already have 3 on the table? Which of the 3 is best? And so on. |
|
07-24-2013, 11:38 AM | #162 |
Award-Winning Participant
Posts: 7,316
Karma: 67862884
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NJ, USA
Device: Kindle
|
|
07-24-2013, 11:53 AM | #163 |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
Sounds like the opposite of an "action mystery". Presumably a novel of the "armchair detective" variety?
|
07-24-2013, 12:02 PM | #164 | |
Maria Schneider
Posts: 3,746
Karma: 26439330
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Austin, Texas
Device: 3g Kindle Keyboard
|
Quote:
I've also heard "pulp mystery, PI mystery, cop mystery..." But all of those are kind of just descriptions to further help people sort. I suppose they are sub-genres, but a lot of people who read cozies aren't even familiar with that term and its a very large category. |
|
07-24-2013, 12:20 PM | #165 |
Banned
Posts: 335
Karma: 1545924
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: India
Device: Kindle KB, Kindle PW
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Casual Vacancy by J.K. Rowling | sun surfer | Reading Recommendations | 32 | 10-25-2012 12:01 PM |
JK Rowling announces new novel | Daithi | News | 205 | 10-17-2012 06:34 PM |
Huffington Post - The New Vanity Publishing : Traditional Publishing | fjtorres | General Discussions | 2 | 08-26-2012 08:48 AM |
JK Rowling Announcement | 6charlong | News | 311 | 06-26-2011 07:01 PM |
Do you think JK Rowling will cave eventually? | ficbot | General Discussions | 85 | 03-31-2010 06:06 PM |