05-11-2013, 05:07 AM | #181 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 11,305
Karma: 43993832
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Monroe Wisconsin
Device: K3, Kindle Paperwhite, Calibre, and Mobipocket for Pc (netbook)
|
Quote:
|
|
05-11-2013, 05:25 AM | #182 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 5,659
Karma: 66420972
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Libra 2, iPadMini4, iPad4, MBP; support other Kobo/Kindles
|
Quote:
Secondly, are you sure that's the analogy you want to use? DRM is more like a security device on a shirt that remains on that shirt when you buy it from the shop. It is criminally illegal to remove the device from the shirt, and even discussing detailed ways to remove it can get you in trouble. The security device prevents you from wearing the shirt in anything other than the prescribed way; if you, say, want to wear the shirt unbuttoned as a jacket, you can't. And if you ever try to resell the shirt or donate it to charity, it explodes and makes the shirt unusable. |
|
Advert | |
|
05-11-2013, 06:11 AM | #183 |
Addict
Posts: 239
Karma: 1664052
Join Date: Mar 2011
Device: Kindle 4NT
|
It is, because the law has been written in such a way that the producer of intellectual property owns that property and can control the use of it. Now the law may be flawed, wrong-headed, or even just plain silly, but that is what the law says. When you infringe the copyright, you are taking that control away from the creator of the intellectual property. It is not the content itself you are stealing, but the right of the creator to control the distribution of their content.
Most DRM controls are in place to ensure that you do not become a content distributor. Just as you're not allowed to go into WalMart, buy a book and then photocopy 100 copies to give to your friends, DRM is intended to keep you from creating 100 copies and giving them to all of your friends. As implemented, however, you can't resell your DRM-managed book. You can't lend it to whomever you wish, for however long you wish. Those are things you can do with a physical book without permission from anyone. But while the expense of creating your own physical copies of a book serve as a deterrent to becoming a content distributor, it is very easy to create and distribute copies of a digital work. As a content creator and consumer myself, I have sympathy for both sides of the debate. I want to be justly rewarded for my efforts in creation. And I want to be able to use an eBook exactly the same way I used a pBook. For me, I only buy eBooks that I expect to be disposable in nature, or where the portability or searchability justify the expense. So, for instance, I have a physical ESV Study Bible that I use to study at home, and carry with me to church. But I also have a DRM eBook of the same, so that when questions come up and I'm not near my physical book, I can whip out my phone and access the same content. However, the eBook was 1/3 the price of the printed volume, which is a savings I both appreciated and rewarded. |
05-11-2013, 06:28 AM | #184 | |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
Quote:
|
|
05-11-2013, 09:38 AM | #185 |
Award-Winning Participant
Posts: 7,318
Karma: 67930154
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NJ, USA
Device: Kindle
|
Yes it is. It is theft of intellectual property, not only in the letter of the law in many places, but in spirit. The only reason I can imagine to say something like that is to try to rationalize law-breaking and live in denial of the harm it does..
|
Advert | |
|
05-11-2013, 09:56 AM | #186 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 5,659
Karma: 66420972
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Libra 2, iPadMini4, iPad4, MBP; support other Kobo/Kindles
|
Quote:
Many laws explicitly exclude intangibles from theft/stealing laws, either in the law or by precedent. Or you could read here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyrig...nt#.22Theft.22 (I see you're in the USA: your Supreme Court, in fact, said that "interference with copyright does not easily equate with theft, conversion, or fraud. The infringer of a copyright does not assume physical control over the copyright nor wholly deprive its owner of its use. Infringement implicates a more complex set of property interests than does run-of-the-mill theft, conversion, or fraud.".) and here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theft and follow the links therein. Or, of course, you could decide I'm just a nasty dirty criminal with nothing of value to contribute. That would sure be easier. Last edited by meeera; 05-11-2013 at 10:00 AM. |
|
05-11-2013, 11:14 AM | #187 | |
Award-Winning Participant
Posts: 7,318
Karma: 67930154
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NJ, USA
Device: Kindle
|
Quote:
The SCOTUS reference you post reads as a serious consideration. "[C]opyright infringement is not theft" as you put it, reads like a dismissal. |
|
05-11-2013, 11:25 AM | #188 |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
But, on the other hand, we have "identity theft". This is of course really fraud, not theft (you don't lose your identity as a result) but, nonetheless, it is both popularly and legally referred to as theft.
|
05-11-2013, 03:24 PM | #189 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,452
Karma: 7185064
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Linköpng, Sweden
Device: Kindle Voyage, Nexus 5, Kindle PW
|
No. It is referred to as 'identity theft' as has been pointed out to you before.
|
05-11-2013, 07:23 PM | #190 | |
Wizard
Posts: 4,812
Karma: 26912940
Join Date: Apr 2010
Device: sony PRS-T1 and T3, Kobo Mini and Aura HD, Tablet
|
Quote:
I also think that publishers, authors, and other venders are within their rights to use DRM if they see fit, and I believe that it has been to their advantage overall, but I do not know that for sure. It is their right and I do not resent it. Like any other product I do not have to buy it, but I do as I like ebooks. As to the fear of losing content, well with most of us (in this discussion) are able to strip DRM if we wish that is not too likely unless we are careless or victims of a fire etc. In fact if I was a victim of fire that burnt up all the copies of ebooks I have, in many cases I can simply redownload them from the seller. Try doing that with your antique credenza. I cannot think of one thing I have bought that is not susceptible to loss so why bring out that tired old Amazon chestnut. I believe that the buyers were reimbursed, I also believe that Amazon acted in a stupid and arbitrary manner, but if the loss of one (I believe it was public domain) ebook has struck fear into the hearts of the book buying public, I am amazed that people still buy bread and cheese for fear that it might mold in their fridge Most of the people who refer to this incident were not even affected slightly, and why is it any more horrific than someone stealing your car or borrowing a book or any other item and not returning it. Oh yeah, I forgot because it is Amazon. Amazon is unlikely to do this again because of bad publicity. You seem to imply that it is likely that they or another vender will run amok and remove all of your content. I think it is unlikely, but hardly the end of the world or justification for doing something you believe is wrong. And if you don't believe it is wrong why bother justifying it. And don't forget Amazon or anyone else can only do this if you are connected to the internet. And as you said, the whole Amazon debacle was initiated by someone infringing copyright. |
|
05-11-2013, 08:58 PM | #191 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 11,305
Karma: 43993832
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Monroe Wisconsin
Device: K3, Kindle Paperwhite, Calibre, and Mobipocket for Pc (netbook)
|
I think it depends on if you own the item or not, and what you do with it. If you own it then it should be yours to do what you will, short of loading it into a torrent file and distributing it to the WWW for free. If you do that, then that is theft. If however you strip the DRM only for the purposes of having a backup copy for your own use should something happen I can't see how that constitutes theft as you have already purchased the book in question.
|
05-11-2013, 10:34 PM | #192 | |
Wizard
Posts: 4,538
Karma: 264065402
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Taiwan
Device: HP Touchpad, Sony Duo 13, Lumia 920, Kobo Aura HD
|
Quote:
|
|
05-12-2013, 07:23 AM | #193 | |
Addict
Posts: 239
Karma: 1664052
Join Date: Mar 2011
Device: Kindle 4NT
|
Quote:
As much as I find this abhorrent, that is the legal reality. |
|
05-12-2013, 07:41 AM | #194 | ||
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by HarryT; 05-12-2013 at 07:52 AM. |
||
05-12-2013, 07:54 AM | #195 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 5,659
Karma: 66420972
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Libra 2, iPadMini4, iPad4, MBP; support other Kobo/Kindles
|
In my jurisdiction, fine print is invalid if it contradicts the large print. I click a "BUY NOW" button on Amazon, not a "Lease Now". Clicking on the "How Buying Works" button gives further text which uses the word "purchase" repeatedly, with nary a "lease" or "license" or "rent" in sight. This particular example is untested in court, but I'm not calling it a foregone conclusion - tech companies have been hammered here on similarly misleading marketing, when they've tried to claim that the customer shoulda read the fine print.
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
eBook Price elasticity: Volume=f(price) | fjtorres | General Discussions | 22 | 07-28-2012 08:57 PM |
Where do you buy used *PRINT* books? | menevets | Lounge | 8 | 12-21-2011 12:30 PM |
'What Price Liberty' available pre-publication as variable price ebook | garygibsonsf | Deals and Resources (No Self-Promotion or Affiliate Links) | 2 | 11-04-2010 10:38 PM |
Print vs Pixel: retailers experiment with print/ebook bundles | DMcCunney | General Discussions | 42 | 09-15-2010 11:29 AM |
eBook price vs pBook price--is that fair?? | rlparker | Amazon Kindle | 11 | 10-06-2008 11:55 AM |