09-06-2013, 07:59 PM | #106 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,032
Karma: 39379388
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: near Philadelphia USA
Device: Kindle Kids Edition, Fire HD 10 (11th generation)
|
If I understand correctly, some here are proposing that the publishers decrease their revenues by charging libraries substantially less than what their business people have determined are optimum prices.
Questions: -- Who should the publisher take this money away from? Authors? Editors? Stockholders? (good answer only if they pay dividends) Executives? (easy answer, but these are publishing executives, not computer executives, so I doubt there is enough money for the purpose in that well). -- Is it any different if the publisher is non-profit? A lot are. Should Harvard reduce financial aid to pay for this? -- Does it matter if the government you are giving this financial gift to is in one of the world's richest countries? -- Does it matter what kind of book it is? My personal view is that charging suboptimal prices is only justifiable as part of the corporation's charitable giving. If on the board of directors, I would favor reduced prices to libraries in a few of the world's poorest nations. And I might favor reduced prices for medical journals, because of the social value of those publications. I certainly favor low prices for medical journals shipped to low income countries. But I'd be against charging western governments a suboptimal price for ordinary popular books. |
09-06-2013, 09:48 PM | #107 | |
Nodding at stupid things
Posts: 209
Karma: 4097046
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Toronto, Canada
Device: Sony T1, OnePlus 6, Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e, iPad Mini 2, PC
|
Quote:
|
|
Advert | |
|
09-06-2013, 09:54 PM | #108 | |
Nodding at stupid things
Posts: 209
Karma: 4097046
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Toronto, Canada
Device: Sony T1, OnePlus 6, Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e, iPad Mini 2, PC
|
Quote:
|
|
09-06-2013, 11:51 PM | #109 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,452
Karma: 7185064
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Linköpng, Sweden
Device: Kindle Voyage, Nexus 5, Kindle PW
|
Quote:
Also the library can never work if each person should be compensated for the tax ha pays to the library. Isn't one of the main idea of a library to make things available to people who would not have them available otherwise. |
|
09-07-2013, 02:56 AM | #110 | |
Nodding at stupid things
Posts: 209
Karma: 4097046
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Toronto, Canada
Device: Sony T1, OnePlus 6, Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e, iPad Mini 2, PC
|
Quote:
|
|
Advert | |
|
09-07-2013, 03:26 AM | #111 | |
Enthusiast
Posts: 25
Karma: 10
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Germany
Device: Kindle DX, Sony PRS T2
|
Quote:
So lets reverse the question. Where do you think the library should get the extra funds to pay for the arbitrarily higher prices of ebooks they have to pay for? The taxpayers? Anyway, in my opinion the problem is in the licensing. As it stands publishers can impose any restrictions they want. Some have commented that it comes with being in a free market, but to me it seems more like small monopolies. Personally, I would support having a set of "minimum rights" associated with purchasing an ebook that you cannot sign away by accepting a license (whether you are a library or consumer). |
|
09-07-2013, 03:37 AM | #112 | |
The Grand Mouse 高貴的老鼠
Posts: 71,490
Karma: 306214458
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: Kindle Voyage
|
Quote:
|
|
09-07-2013, 03:51 AM | #113 | |
"Assume a can opener..."
Posts: 755
Karma: 1942109
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Local Cluster
Device: iLiad v2, DR1000
|
Quote:
Also, a lot of companies have been saddled with debts to their investor owners, with the effect being largely the same as paying dividends -- if cast in a different legal form for tax (evasion) purposes. Often in such cases, the loan sum is given back to the investor/owner as a 'superdividend' or whatever the euphemism is; if those kinds of structures were forbidden/recognized for the tax dodges they were, publishers would have more money left over for actual publishing (at lower costs).. A bit off-topic, but why on earth should Harvard (etc.) UP reduce financial aid? As I see it, they have lots of options.. to name just a few: 1. Sue Larry Summers for mismanagement of Harvard University leading to the loss of the something like $2B, and force him to give up everything he owns from now until his death.. 2. dial down the super-star salaries for their tenured faculty for moral purposes and give non-tenured faculty and other workers more reasonable wages instead; cut away the management layer that has sprung into existence over the past 30 years or so. 3. I don't know if the profits from harvard's (etc.) publishing arm are required to go into student aid, but if not, I'd say Harvard could do with a few less prestige projects (new, dysfunctional but pretty or imposing buildings...), while continuing to offer 'student aid' at the low levels they do today, justified by the ridiculous fees they charge for access. To sum up, I have doubts about your implicit suggestion that the companies are being run 'efficiently' in a meaningful sense of the word.. Last edited by zerospinboson; 09-07-2013 at 03:55 AM. |
|
09-07-2013, 06:13 AM | #114 | |||
Guru
Posts: 914
Karma: 3410461
Join Date: May 2004
Device: Kindle Touch
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I made the analogy to point out that it's not reasonable why wholesale merchants (like libraries) should pay a premium merely based on the assumption that an eBook is lent out and thus read by more than one person. |
|||
09-07-2013, 06:56 AM | #115 | |
Wizard
Posts: 1,264
Karma: 10203040
Join Date: Dec 2011
Device: a variety (mostly kindles and kobos)
|
Quote:
Publishers will only get the message that they're overpricing their licenses (if that's the case) if enough libraries refuse to pay. As for having "already paid" you could argue the same for other items such as DVDs or whatever. But whether or not they charge a fee they should make it clear to their patrons why, or why there aren't more ebooks available. Trouble is there are plenty of taxpayers who'd happily see libraries disappear. |
|
09-07-2013, 07:10 AM | #116 | |
Addict
Posts: 239
Karma: 1664052
Join Date: Mar 2011
Device: Kindle 4NT
|
Quote:
Now, as a library patron, of course I want everything to be free. And I appreciate and enjoy the convenience of borrowing eBooks. I dislike the limited selection and the long waits that come with it. But it is hard for me to say, "Hey, spend 16x as much on one eBook as a printed copy would cost." It is hard for me to look at the selection of children's books and say, "We could have a lot more new titles if eBooks weren't so darned expensive." So while I agree that eBooks are popular, and library patrons want them, I don't see how they are cost-effective if the library can't pass the costs on somehow. Perhaps we could start a referendum in every town in America to raise funding for eBooks through a tax hike. But I doubt it would pass. So if patrons can't pay a fee and taxpayers wouldn't raise taxes to pay for eBooks, it means that every eBook means at least 4 physical books don't show up on the shelf. And over time, that will reduce the availability of information to patrons. Thus, as much as I dislike it, I'm willing to pay a small fee to borrow an eBook. |
|
09-07-2013, 07:47 AM | #117 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,032
Karma: 39379388
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: near Philadelphia USA
Device: Kindle Kids Edition, Fire HD 10 (11th generation)
|
Correct.
Now, if I am searching correctly, your library has 30,528 encrypted ePUB titles, making it one of the world's best for us: http://toronto.lib.overdrive.com/780...rtBy=Relevancy When you add in the duplicate copies, not included in my count, this arguably amounts to a branch library without the costs of construction and physical maintenance.* 8,347 titles have been added in the past six months, showing that the apparently profligate Toronto library continues to feed the alleged beast: http://toronto.lib.overdrive.com/780...rtBy=Relevancy Quote:
Because many readers still don't use eReaders, I think that libraries should spend the bulk of their acquisitions budget on paper books. But for those which can, with eBook purchases, afford to support the kind of publishers who offer advances and provide substantial editorial assistance by paying US$90 for a Random House eBook, good for them. Unless relatively rich cities like Toronto change their ways, the publishers would be mistaken to charge less. It is wonderful that Toronto has enough money to support the book creation industry in this way. But if a community doesn't have the money, just buy paper books, with a mix of regular and large print. ________________________ * This isn't to negate the value of librarians and non-borrowing library services. I'm just pointing out that copyrighted eBooks, while more expensive to buy than paper, save other costs. Last edited by SteveEisenberg; 09-07-2013 at 07:52 AM. |
|
09-07-2013, 10:25 AM | #118 |
Wizard
Posts: 1,531
Karma: 8059866
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Canada
Device: Kobo H2O / Aura HD / Glo / iPad3
|
The library system has been able to successfully coexist with the publishing industry for hundreds of years. Despite it's existence the publishing industry has been able to pull in billions of dollars of annual revenue and hundreds of millions of annual profits, this is not a destitute industry and it's not a balance that was broken.
The library Overdrive lending system was designed to exactly mimic the lending of paper books except the publishers have decided to band together and either completely withhold ebooks or charge 4 to 6 times the equivalent paper book costs. They've openly admitted that their goal is to cripple the library system or to use their language "introduce friction". It's disingenuous to suggest that the libraries can just stop buying from them, the publishers would be thrilled. Oh sure they'd put on a face that they're losing revenue but they would be laughing. When prices suddenly jump by 400 to 600 percent it's a clear indication of a free market failure. It's not surprising because the library system is not a free market system, it's a government service funded (mostly) by taxpayers. I not only believe it's appropriate for the government to step in, I believe it's their responsibility to. They can't keep pretending the free market system will fix it. |
09-07-2013, 12:43 PM | #119 | |
Addict
Posts: 239
Karma: 1664052
Join Date: Mar 2011
Device: Kindle 4NT
|
Quote:
In a free market, it is the job of the consumer (in this case, the libraries) to demand as much product they can for as little cost as they can. It is the job of the producer (in this case, the publishers) to demand as much money for as little product as possible. It is not a free market failure if one side or the other changes the terms and conditions of the deal. If you stop buying beef because it's become too expensive, that's not a free market failure. And if libraries stopped buying eBooks because the publishers are demanding too much money, it is also not a free market failure. But the very fact that libraries are and continue to buy eBooks at the prices publishers are demanding means that they must believe they are getting fair value for their purchase. What you seem to think is that because the libraries are paying a price that is higher than the one you think they should, the government should insist that the publishers charge less. Which could very easily drive the publishers out of business, since no business does well when people who lack the skills to run a business attempt to use their threat of force (which is precisely how governments do anything) to run it. In any other situation, we'd call that thuggery, criminal behavior, or outright theft, but when the government does it, we call it "in the public's best interest." There is no way a 400-600% rise indicates that the free market has failed. Especially when dealing with new products where companies have not yet established long-term buying habits and trends. |
|
09-07-2013, 01:41 PM | #120 | |
Enthusiast
Posts: 25
Karma: 10
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Germany
Device: Kindle DX, Sony PRS T2
|
Quote:
In my opinion, the government should only insist that libraries are not discriminated against. Just like a library can buy a pbook or DVD at the same price as you, they should be able to do the same with ebooks. There is no real reason for different pricing and licensing terms just for libraries. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Publishers Restricting Libraries: RIP Sony Readers? | randyflycaster | Sony Reader | 44 | 03-16-2011 07:28 PM |
How to Destroy The Book - Cory Doctorow | Elfwreck | News | 44 | 12-19-2009 12:07 AM |
New Cory Doctorow non-fiction book | garygibsonsf | Deals and Resources (No Self-Promotion or Affiliate Links) | 22 | 10-21-2008 09:44 PM |
Cory Doctorow book search | HappyMartin | Reading Recommendations | 7 | 08-06-2008 09:25 AM |
New CC E-book from Cory Doctorow | plantedbypiggies | Deals and Resources (No Self-Promotion or Affiliate Links) | 7 | 05-08-2008 01:12 PM |