09-24-2013, 11:52 AM | #1 |
Addict
Posts: 283
Karma: 1011418
Join Date: Jun 2010
Device: Kindle 3, Nook Color
|
Touch Vs Classic Screen Clarity
A couple of weeks back, I purchased a new in the box Nook 1st Gen from Ebay, which I love. Nice Audiobook player and great page turn buttons, screen resolution, external speakers, etc. My daughter stopped by for a visit last night and had her Nook Simple Touch in her handbag and we compared. Sure enough, the older model Classic 1st Gen has a much brighter, lighter screen and more contrast. What happened? The Simple Touch has a much darker, grey shaded screen. Just an interesting note..Are they still making E ink devices?
|
09-24-2013, 12:15 PM | #2 |
Gadgetoholic
Posts: 1,462
Karma: 2731820
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Sweden
Device: Kobo Libra2, Tolino Vision 6
|
The Classic had an incredible screen for its time! I do prefer the Touch's screen though. Text is crisper (and general use interface is better). Having said that, I could easily settle with a Classic if I had to. A truly great ereader!!
|
09-28-2013, 10:36 AM | #3 |
Member
Posts: 12
Karma: 10
Join Date: Jul 2010
Device: Nook
|
Plus - unless things have changed in the few months since I've been here (which is why I'm here this morning) - there's the ability to delete on the device.
|
09-28-2013, 01:45 PM | #4 |
Gadgetoholic
Posts: 1,462
Karma: 2731820
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Sweden
Device: Kobo Libra2, Tolino Vision 6
|
The only thing I didn't like with the Classic was battery life.
And yes, it IS an advantage to be able to delete on the device! Hate that on the Touch (that I otherwise love)! |
09-28-2013, 04:15 PM | #5 |
Enthusiast
Posts: 35
Karma: 100400
Join Date: Nov 2012
Device: Nook Touch
|
The 1st gen was a lovely device, probably the prettiest Nook device.
It had a beautiful cream colored background which I do miss, but Nook Touch has crisper dark text. The Touch lasts so much longer, it's faster, has fewer page refreshes, and it weighs less with small dimensions so for me it's easier to hold, and with a cover fits more easily in a smaller purse/bag. I prefer having the option of touch and buttons and navigation is much more seamless on the Touch. I love the idea of audio but I never used it for books and music because it would eat up the battery faster and the color screen (which I liked) was already eating it up. The most I could go without recharging was a few days - with the Touch it's weeks. I wouldn't mind having the audio option back on the touch since it doesn't have the LCD color screen any more. Audio would also give the hopeful option for some text-to-speech via rooting which would be good for my Mom. I do miss the superior shelving options on the 1st Ed as well as the ability to delete - I can't understand why the Nook Touch doesn't have these features. |
10-10-2013, 04:42 PM | #6 |
Addict
Posts: 283
Karma: 1011418
Join Date: Jun 2010
Device: Kindle 3, Nook Color
|
I'm loving this ereader... Even found a great leatherette easel case for $4.00. I do listen to audio books on it and find it's so easy to find one's place, advance etc. Mine has great battery life; I keep it set on airplane and charge every now and again. Does anyone know how to identify the cityscapes with the lovely spires and towers? I'd love to know which is which. Thanks
|
Tags |
nook classic, nook st |
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Screen Protector that keeps Clarity? | Blossom | Kindle Fire | 5 | 09-05-2012 08:11 PM |
Touch Moved from Nook Classic to Kobo Touch | six58 | Kobo Reader | 0 | 05-19-2012 02:29 AM |
Should I replace my Classic with a Simple Touch? | zarquon | Barnes & Noble NOOK | 13 | 03-10-2012 08:05 PM |
Free Nook Classic with broken screen | apastuszak | Flea Market | 0 | 12-11-2011 12:51 AM |
Touch screen modification on PRS 700 for improved clarity and contrast | gokalp | Sony Reader | 24 | 06-29-2009 02:22 PM |