07-06-2009, 04:35 AM | #16 |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
I beg to differ, Sonest. PDF is an open standard; to be specific it is standard number ISO 32000-1. It was adopted by ISO in 2008.
|
07-06-2009, 09:37 AM | #17 |
Addict
Posts: 257
Karma: 960
Join Date: Dec 2006
Device: REB1200; REB2150; Sony 500/350; EZReader; IREX DR800SG; Nook/Color
|
Well a lot of people, me included. Sorry if you think it means nothing.
At work we consume and prepare technical documentation. We have two types of people the ones that like pdf and the ones that like chm. Guess why we have the people preferring pdf, they are the ones who without exception print manuals then on paper to read - always. So they are not the ones intereste in the E in the ebook. PDF is not a good book format. Last edited by dmikov; 07-08-2009 at 08:08 AM. |
Advert | |
|
07-06-2009, 10:14 AM | #18 |
creator of calibre
Posts: 43,778
Karma: 22666666
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Mumbai, India
Device: Various
|
@Sonist: let's have this discussion again in 10 years. What do you say to a little friendly wager?
|
07-06-2009, 10:26 AM | #19 |
Guru
Posts: 962
Karma: 568242
Join Date: Dec 2007
Device: Kindle Oasis 3, Kindle Paperwhite 1, iPad, iPhone
|
I think the general public would consider any book in digital format to be considered an "ebook", especially PDF eBooks. When I asked my brother-in-law what format he wanted for his company's new e-Book, he said "PDF, of course." He doesn't understand the differences between formats, the pros and cons of all the different options, nor any of the technical aspects of producing ebooks. When I asked why, his reply was simple and indicative of the general sentiment, in my opinion, of the general computing public: "because everyone can read a PDF."
So while to some PDF is a backward format for e-Books, there is no denying that the general public believes it to be an e-Book "standard". |
07-06-2009, 10:51 AM | #20 |
frumious Bandersnatch
Posts: 7,514
Karma: 18512745
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Spaniard in Sweden
Device: Cybook Orizon, Kobo Aura
|
An "ebook" can be at least two different things:
1. A document to be read, viewed, browsed and searched on computer-like devices. 2. A digital "copy" of a traditional book. If you mean 1, then PDF is not the best suited format, HTML, ePUB, CHM, etc. are way better. But if you mean 2, PDF is the best and most accepted format. |
Advert | |
|
07-06-2009, 10:54 AM | #21 |
The one and only
Posts: 3,302
Karma: 535819
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Berlin, Germany
Device: yup!
|
PDF is a versatile file format if it comes to DTP. That's what it has been created for. A digital copy which keeps the layout of the to-be-printed pages. And, indeed, a lot of my customers who buy PDF eBooks actually print them. This is why I still publish my PDF files in letter paper size to meet my customer's needs.
PDF is all about printing. It isn't very abjustable, nor customizable or scalable once it is created. While "native" eBook formats like PRC or EPUB are more like liquid to me, I always perceive PDF as a rock. There's nothing more annoying than reading a PDF file on my PC screen which hasn't been optimised for its resolution. Even worse on an eBook reading device. PDF is all about books. eBooks are all about texts. That's the main difference. Form versus substance. I'd rather put my money in HTML, XML or CSS than in PDF when it comes to magazine layouts on any future reading device. |
07-06-2009, 01:36 PM | #22 |
Apeist
Posts: 2,126
Karma: 381090
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The sunny part of California
Device: Generic virtual reality story-experiential device
|
|
07-06-2009, 01:56 PM | #23 |
creator of calibre
Posts: 43,778
Karma: 22666666
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Mumbai, India
Device: Various
|
|
07-06-2009, 02:02 PM | #24 | |
Apeist
Posts: 2,126
Karma: 381090
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The sunny part of California
Device: Generic virtual reality story-experiential device
|
Quote:
If the focus was just documents, we wouldn't even have this discussion - plain text is perfectly adequate for most. But there are a lot of occasions, where layout and fonts need to be set, and not reflow. My point is, that as the hardware becomes more robust, e-readers will have to handle a lot more than "documents," if they are to gain wide acceptance. There is no way you can do a very complex magazine design, or ad, with something like ePub (not that I am aware of.) Nor with HTML. PDF is the only format which can handle such demands. It has also evolved, so for "plain" text, it can reflow on small screens. And it is ONE format, which can scale depending on the needs. And it is widely popular, and not just for printing documents, but for viewing them on screen (I don't even remember the last time I had to print a PDF, including forms - I just sign fill them out and sign them digitally.) And, the chances are, that if I purchase a title today in PDF format, I'll be able to use the same file, on my computer, laptop, tablet, or future color e-reader. I personally don't care that others like competing formats, but my fear is, that a bunch of incompatible formats will only confuse the market, and delay the adoption of ebooks. And that formats, which cannot handle complex, fixed layouts, will be obsolete when large, color, standardized screens become the norm, allowing for complex content to finally be placed on e-readers. P.S. HarryT, thanks for pointing out that PDF is now an open standard. I think it makes the argument for its adoption even stronger. P.P.S. kovidgoyal, I am looking forward to getting my donation back :-) Last edited by Sonist; 07-06-2009 at 02:05 PM. |
|
07-06-2009, 05:41 PM | #25 | |
Reticulator of Tharn
Posts: 618
Karma: 400000
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: EST
Device: Sony PRS-505
|
Quote:
This means that PDF reflow can only reflow pure text, and even that with quite mixed results. The current state of PDF reflow on the Sony Reader is a good example -- line breaks appear at awkward places, words not properly re-joined over cross-line hyphenation, paragraph breaks missed, images awkwardly sized, captions divorced from their figures, headers & footers mixed into the text, and so on. PDF reflow allows the document text to be viewed, but not attractively or even always coherently. The only ways to change that are either (a) incorporate a superb complete layout analysis engine into the PDF renderer, essentially doing all the work of a commercial OCR engine except for actually recognizing individual characters (or perhaps even that, in the case of image PDFs); or (b) extend the PDF format with so much reflow tagging information that it essentially becomes a new reflowable format. I don't doubt that people prefer PDF due to familiarity and attractiveness of the results of display-size-optimized output, but that doesn't mean that it's an optimal format for targeting the vast number different display sizes people are and will be reading books on. |
|
07-07-2009, 02:43 PM | #26 |
Wizard
Posts: 1,790
Karma: 507333
Join Date: May 2009
Device: none
|
What many here tend to (dis)miss is that reflow is only necessary because both eBook technologies and the eBook market are incredibly immature. (I've elaborated on this point at downright ludicrous length elsewhere.)
No format other than PDF can achieve consistent and professional typography, and professional typography in published books (including eBooks, once publishers start to give a damn)--regardless of what myriad non-specialists altogether uninvolved in the publishing industry think--is no more likely to disappear than professionally tailored clothes. I am sympathetic to people who are worried that format incompatibilities or PDF's inflexibility will screw them out a legitimate purchase's continued utility... but it is short-sighted to insist on fixing something that is fundamentally a consumer's rights issue by clamoring to forever handicap eBooks through the use of broken-by-design reflow formats. - Ahi |
07-07-2009, 02:59 PM | #27 |
creator of calibre
Posts: 43,778
Karma: 22666666
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Mumbai, India
Device: Various
|
The standards of professional typography are not set in stone. If they were, we'd still be using the typographic conventions of the Stone Age. The definition of "good typography" will change in the modern age of reflowable formats. And "professional typographers" will just have to learn new standards.
|
07-07-2009, 10:39 PM | #28 |
Lector minore
Posts: 649
Karma: 1738720
Join Date: Jan 2008
Device: Aura One, Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e, Google Pixel Slate
|
I like PDF. I think it is a good standard and incredibly useful. I love Postscript which is kind of a great-uncle to PDF.
But I hope that PDF doesn't become the dominant ebook format. For the PDF enthusiasts above, I wonder if you guys read on more than one device? I flip back and forth over a few devices for the same book depending on the environment/situation. So I might start on my Sony PRS-505, but then read on my Macbook or my desktop PC in little snatches while I wait for other stuff on my computer to finish. And I will continue on my Palm phone as I wait in line etc. This works great with reflowable formats. I can't imagine using the same PDF to go from a little 320x320 phone up to a 1960x1080 PC monitor. |
07-08-2009, 06:33 AM | #29 | |
"Assume a can opener..."
Posts: 755
Karma: 1942109
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Local Cluster
Device: iLiad v2, DR1000
|
Quote:
Taking that as the baseline, I prefer the fixed size of a PDF. Sure, .mobi rendering might improve (though not likely on my iLiad), but that fact is pretty useless to me right now. And especially as most of the stuff I read are academic titles, I *really* prefer PDF. Sure, I lose some white space around the edges, but I can't really say it bothers me all that much either. For pleasure reading, I have nothing against mobi or epub (though I wish rendering on my device was better), but to say I lean heavily in that direction would be an overstatement. As for switching between multiple devices: I do wonder how you keep track of the 'page' which you are reading if you're indeed reading the same title on all of those devices. |
|
07-08-2009, 06:59 AM | #30 | |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
Quote:
|
|
Tags |
epub |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
eScape - Free Open Office Writer to ePub Creator ! | Munish | ePub | 63 | 06-17-2011 03:37 AM |
Adobe epub or Adobe Digital Edition? | Davimee | Astak EZReader | 11 | 01-17-2010 08:15 PM |
What convertor/creator for ePub | peggynek | ePub | 8 | 03-17-2009 06:03 PM |
Doc Reader & Creator | Kurz | Workshop | 1 | 05-23-2008 10:15 AM |
Manga creator from JPEGs? (BBeb creator) | jessesn | Sony Reader | 3 | 10-03-2006 12:06 AM |