09-06-2010, 08:34 PM | #61 | |
Evangelist
Posts: 435
Karma: 24326
Join Date: Jun 2010
Device: Kobo
|
Quote:
Tech never evolves the way you'd expect. Get over it. The fact that the Kindle is Amazon's number one selling product is, in and of itself, an amazing and positive development. And by Christmas, we'll probably see a number of 6" devices selling for around $100. Are you disappointed in that? |
|
09-06-2010, 08:35 PM | #62 |
Addict
Posts: 292
Karma: 24688
Join Date: Aug 2009
Device: Sony PRS-505, iPad
|
|
Advert | |
|
09-06-2010, 08:40 PM | #63 |
Evangelist
Posts: 435
Karma: 24326
Join Date: Jun 2010
Device: Kobo
|
|
09-06-2010, 08:46 PM | #64 | |
Evangelist
Posts: 435
Karma: 24326
Join Date: Jun 2010
Device: Kobo
|
Quote:
Flash is more than just video, so it wasn't redundant to list it as well as video. Yeah, and the "[sic]" was a dig. I can be as petty as the next guy. |
|
09-06-2010, 11:08 PM | #65 |
Is that a sandwich?
Posts: 8,189
Karma: 100500000
Join Date: Jun 2010
Device: Nook Glowlight Plus
|
One area where the tech has been slow is battery life. The latest group of tablets get less than 10 hours with some as low as 4 hours. That wouldnt be long enough to get a person through a typical work or school day.
|
Advert | |
|
09-06-2010, 11:49 PM | #66 | |
Wizard
Posts: 1,531
Karma: 34583358
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Quincy, MA
Device: Samsung 54A, Kobo Libra H2O, Samsung S6 Lite
|
Quote:
One of the main & most beneficial attractions of the 5 & 6" readers is that they are lighter than pbooks & you can carry it around with your entire library if you so choose. The whole intent of the majority of ereaders is to be PORTABLE! A coffee table book size ereader kind of defeats that purpose. They are focusing on the largest market segment for book readers which is most likely readers of novels. Don't like it, stick with pbooks. But for the vast majority of us, we are satisfied with how the progress is going with the ebook market. Or actually most of us don't give a crap, since we are too busy reading our books on our 5 & 6" readers! |
|
09-07-2010, 12:15 AM | #67 |
Wizard
Posts: 1,101
Karma: 4388403
Join Date: Oct 2007
Device: Palm>Ebookman>IPaq>Axim>Cybook>Kndl2>IPAD>Kndl3SO>Voyager>Oasis
|
I'm not sure I agree with HarryE123, but I do think I can put some of his thoughts in perspective for some of you. It's a matter of history for some of us old timers here.
EInk was founded in 1997 -- thirteen years ago. Since that time, many of us have been waiting for products. The devices we have now are excellent, but in many ways they are still first generation devices. I agree that eink is much better than an Ipad in terms of eye strain. I had an Ipad for a couple of weeks, and I just like eink better. However, the Ipad has a real advantage in interactivity. For example, I just read another thread about needing to skip back a few pages to refer to an early section of the book. Being able to navigate around is much easier on an Ipad type of device. Or being able to read academic pdf's (sorry that's the only way they come) and navigate around by dragging them. Since 1997, we've been looking at eink struggle to come to market, struggle to produce a big screen that wouldn't crack in real usage, work on faster page response and color. It's not that I'm looking for a computer, but faster, flexible and even color screens do have uses (annotation, highlighting, etc.). And its not just eink. Those of us who have been around for a while have struggled with many earlier iterations: CRT's, laptops, tablet computers, palm pilots, ebookman, newtons, rocket readers and more. The thing is that when you look at the changes in personal and palmtop computing over the last 33 years since the Apple II is introduced, the progress on e-ink is quite disappointing. If my goal is a dedicated reading device, I would think it would be quite a bit simpler than some of the other things that were done with portable electronics. The problem may be the target market. I don't think those of us here on Mobileread have agreed on how many people actually read ( https://www.mobileread.com/forums/showthread.php?t=95790 ). However, let's say that you do believe the Forrester Research quote that 33 million (in the US) read at least 2 books a month. I would think that the target market of those who would spend $130 (or more) on a dedicated reading device would only be those who read heavier amounts. Now of those 10% who read at least 24 books a year, how many are techno-phobes? Or in love with the printed book? Or at an age where they are more resistant to new technology? The point is that the target market for ebooks is probably much less than 10% (5%?) and a reasonable penetration of that target is an even smaller sliver of pie. Manufacturers may not see enough incentive to invest more than a small piece of their resources in the dedicated market. On the other hand, a multi-purpose (iPad?) device may be more attractive to them. |
09-07-2010, 01:12 AM | #68 |
Karma Kameleon
Posts: 2,934
Karma: 26616647
Join Date: Aug 2009
Device: iPad Mini, iPhone X, Kindle Fire Tab HD 8, Walmart Onn
|
There is just not enough of an advantage to eink to support advanced products in the wake of the iPad. The advanced ereading functionality is going to come in the form of iPad apps and android apps to follow.
Lee |
09-07-2010, 02:33 AM | #69 | |
<Insert Wit Here>
Posts: 1,017
Karma: 1275899
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Puget Sound
Device: Kindle Oasis, Kobo Forma
|
Quote:
LCDs like are used today started back in 1972. It took 20 years to make it into products the consumer could buy and hook up to a computer (roughly). Another 10 to become cheap enough to completely replace the CRT. The difference here is that a new display tech took 10 years to go from concept to real product. That's not bad. They found a market that can fund the development of the technology. That it was more mainstream than the market for a mainframe + a few dozen dumb terminals is also huge. Integrated Circuits were absolutely huge, and involved 10+ years of work to produce transistors that allows consumer electronics to function, let alone the extra work that took that and developed it into a way to create the silicon circuits required for ICs. So keep in mind that there has been a pretty big struggle behind a lot of the major developments that drove advances in electronics and computing. |
|
09-07-2010, 03:04 AM | #70 | |
Wizard
Posts: 1,385
Karma: 16056
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Asia
Device: Kindle 3 WiFi, Sony PRS-505
|
Quote:
Apologists can try to vindicate the lack of development with excuses regarding financial viability, but as a consumer, I don't care. |
|
09-07-2010, 03:28 AM | #71 | |
<Insert Wit Here>
Posts: 1,017
Karma: 1275899
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Puget Sound
Device: Kindle Oasis, Kobo Forma
|
Quote:
But when someone comments on eInk displays, I respond to their comment. I wasn't trying to discuss the issues with software development, and the myriad of legal issues that have made software development a minefield these days. That can be a huge rant onto itself. This whole response is a bit of a tangent from eInk to the media format. The simple fact that DRM has fractured the market and there are multiple formats is not a good thing in the long term. The whole industry has really gotten into a bad position because the publishers don't know what they need for a digital format yet. The technical companies don't know how to cooperate on a format for the sake of keeping the market healthy. And to top it all off, OEMs tend to also be book sellers, and not have a ton of software expertise in this area. They have to buy it (Mobipocket) or partner with someone who has it (Adobe). It's a bit of a mess, but I'm not entirely surprised for a first attempt into digital publishing with an industry that quite honestly, never took the market very seriously until the last year or so. |
|
09-07-2010, 04:34 AM | #72 | |
Enthusiast
Posts: 48
Karma: 160
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: UK
Device: Sony PRS-505, Lenovo X61 tablet PC, Advent Vega Android tablet
|
Quote:
Consumer products and their capabilities have arisen purely from market drivers, so consumers only have themselves to blame if things haven't quite turned out as they wish. If current solutions don't meet your needs you can do something about it; write some alternative software yourself, or fund a company or team to do it for you. But beware the legal and commercial entaglements that are rife in technology products and services - creating a technical solution is hard but comparatively straightforward compared to being able to actually sell the product. If instead you only demand your "consumer rights" with everything at the least cost then I fear you will likely become increasingly dissappointed. Last edited by dapriuk; 09-07-2010 at 11:45 AM. |
|
09-07-2010, 05:47 AM | #73 | |
mrkrgnao
Posts: 241
Karma: 237248
Join Date: May 2010
Device: PRS650, K3 Wireless, Galaxy S3, iPad 3.
|
Quote:
Most people who have an interest in reading won't even have seen an eink display, and certainly wouldn't go out of their way to seek one out to try. For many of those who are happy to use devices such as the iPad to read, it is far more important that they can convince themselves it is the best device to read on than that it actually be the best device to read on. They want to be able to say 'I own the best device for reading ebooks. I am a reader,' rather than actually read books (apologies to those serious readers who actually do find backlit displays give a comfortable reading experience). So, to give this majority of 'convergence device' users, the next development in ebooks is more likely to be increasingly interactive 'Books 2.0TM' with sound effects, links to Wikipedia pages and wizzy graphics, rather than actual screen developments in dedicated ereaders. Publishers (Apple certainly have aspirations to milk this market segment as well as hardware sales) will like this, as it will give a justification for keeping ebooks as expensive - if not more so - than pbooks. The ebook future profit lies with those who think that an accelerometer mini-game integrated into page fifteen would be a good thing. This will be the 'advanced ereading functionality' Lee speaks of. Who knows, perhaps the sales-success of the K3 will demonstrate that there is a decent-sized market out there for a dedicated device with a high-quality screen. For the time being, though, the screen that makes money is going to be a 6" one. |
|
09-07-2010, 06:30 AM | #74 | |
Wizard
Posts: 1,385
Karma: 16056
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Asia
Device: Kindle 3 WiFi, Sony PRS-505
|
Quote:
|
|
09-07-2010, 06:33 AM | #75 | |
Wizard
Posts: 1,340
Karma: 1160346
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Southport, GB
Device: Kindle Voyage, PW Signature edition
|
Quote:
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Error developing new plug-in | DarkAbsynthe | Calibre | 6 | 09-24-2010 02:01 PM |
Developing for the iPad? | phmadore | General Discussions | 7 | 04-09-2010 05:48 PM |
I need help for developing | Smellyday | Kindle Developer's Corner | 1 | 11-28-2009 11:12 AM |
iLiad iLiad Developing Conventions? | rudysplif | iRex Developer's Corner | 2 | 12-04-2007 10:52 AM |
iLiad Developing Apps | Open Window | iRex Developer's Corner | 10 | 02-13-2007 11:49 AM |