11-11-2013, 05:14 PM | #46 | |
The Dank Side of the Moon
Posts: 35,872
Karma: 118716293
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Device: Kindle2; Kindle Fire
|
Quote:
|
|
11-11-2013, 05:17 PM | #47 | |
Wizard
Posts: 4,896
Karma: 33602910
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: PocketBook 903 & 360+
|
Quote:
Having 10+ articles opened in a PDF reader, looking for new ones in a browser, some word files with my own results it's all very easy with a PC. The only reason why I still need to use paper is that there are books that I can't get my hands on for free in a digital format. |
|
Advert | |
|
11-11-2013, 05:26 PM | #48 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 6,111
Karma: 34000001
Join Date: Mar 2008
Device: KPW1, KA1
|
Quote:
That is what I meant with using the wrong medium: A tablet is great for reading a PDF from beginning to end, but it's horrible if using multiple PDF's at once, and having to flip or search through them. |
|
11-11-2013, 05:48 PM | #49 | |
Wizard
Posts: 4,896
Karma: 33602910
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: PocketBook 903 & 360+
|
Quote:
|
|
11-11-2013, 06:10 PM | #50 | |
Wizard
Posts: 4,812
Karma: 26912940
Join Date: Apr 2010
Device: sony PRS-T1 and T3, Kobo Mini and Aura HD, Tablet
|
Quote:
I am vaguely uncomfortable reading anything but web content on a tablet. I read few technical books these days but when I do I prefer paper with the post it note bookmarks. I can deal with badly formatted up to the point when there are no paragraph breaks at all if I want to read the book. My brain seems to just get used to it. I totally agree that for switching back and forth between different books/articles the computer is the way to go. Helen |
|
Advert | |
|
11-12-2013, 12:31 AM | #51 |
Member
Posts: 20
Karma: 515570
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Palo Alto, California Usono
Device: Kobo Arc and Aura HD, Kindle Keyboard, and DX
|
I pay the most attention to anecdotal reports of actual users ... such as the posts above about when people turn to specific media.
The subject is too squishy for a purely academic research approach. People are expecting physiology to deliver a ringing generalization that can become the new dogma. Typically a key variable is left out, to be rediscovered later for a new all-encompassing generalization. Much better I say to observe behavior and get people to talk about their preferences. When I was doing User Interface (UI) testing, we were always being surprised. Our precious theories were inevitably upended by real users. |
11-12-2013, 03:07 AM | #52 |
Addict
Posts: 239
Karma: 1280000
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: USA
Device: None
|
Comparing one display for n books / pdfs versus n books isn't the only comparison that should be made. A book is both content and display. When I wrote code or did code analysis or troubleshooting, I used up to four displays, and that was back when they were CRTs. I would have used more screens if they had allowed it, the same way I would have more than 4 binders open when I needed to.
If I was a "knowledge worker" today, I might well have a dozen 12" screen tablets stacked in a milk crate to deploy as needed. If you're working with several or many sources of reference material, of dozens or hundreds of pages each, I won't argue against paper (like a set of binders) still being about as efficient as anything, as long as it is supplemented with electronic access so searches and other tools can be brought to bear. |
11-12-2013, 03:13 AM | #53 |
Addict
Posts: 239
Karma: 1280000
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: USA
Device: None
|
Someone should take a page from a well-printed book (one considered easy to read), frame it, and frame using an identical frame a tablet right beside it. Then play with settings on the tablet to try to mimic the paper as closely as possible, and see what came of it under a range of viewing conditions.
I don't count the recent usage of background images and page turn animations as being serious, or at least sufficient, efforts in that direction. |
11-12-2013, 08:11 AM | #54 | ||
Wizard
Posts: 4,896
Karma: 33602910
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: PocketBook 903 & 360+
|
Quote:
A new dogma is necessary because the old dogma is based on back-lit screens in the 1960's. Quote:
|
||
11-12-2013, 08:29 AM | #55 |
Wizard
Posts: 4,812
Karma: 26912940
Join Date: Apr 2010
Device: sony PRS-T1 and T3, Kobo Mini and Aura HD, Tablet
|
An objective opinion seems a bit of an oxymoron. How can you prove an opinion?
Helen |
11-12-2013, 09:25 AM | #56 | |
Addict
Posts: 316
Karma: 1021312
Join Date: Jun 2009
Device: Sony PRS-T1
|
Quote:
kennyc sounded very happy about this lonely article and quoted the conclusion...typical of lazy, biased readers. I can read, so I am going to demonstrate to all of you how it is done properly. First, you have to examine who did and who funded this research. This research was partly funded by the marketing branch of the German book industry, so if you know anything about the corruption and position of weakness of the majority of scientists in relation to funding, you immediately understand you have to research the strategic goals of this industry. Like everywhere else, they are seeing diminishing sales of paper books and bet the future of their business on electronic versions of books. Better still, the introduction of this paper states the goal, which is to assuage the fears of the too conservative German readers who are moving too slowly away from paper books compared to their American counterparts, negatively influenced by articles published in the German press which dared attack screen technologies and their impact on child development. Another stated goal is specifically to contradict a large-scale survey of students and faculty at University College London in which students subjectively judged the ease of reading of e-books to be considerably worse than for conventional printed books. The first scientific data they present is by far the most revealing : it shows that the reading comprehension error rate is the lowest for the text read on paper ! It is even clearer for the largest and sociologically most coherent group : the students. But here you can see that the devil is in the details : the graphic goes up to 100% even though there is no data above 35%, thus visually crushing the differences. Among students, if you look precisely, you reach a major conclusion: the error rate is between one third and one half higher for texts read on tablets and e-ink than for texts read on paper ! But the researchers under the monetary influence of the modernizing German book industry magically fail to state this. They dismiss this fundamental finding under a fallacious statistical pretext. Then, after dismissing subjective preferences for paper, they pretend to scientifically fool you with loads of EEG research they do not objectively, scientifically know what to make of, filling their paper with lots of guesses. And why theta, but neither alpha nor beta waves ? Marshall McLuhan and Herbert Krugman knew what they would reveal when reading on a back-lit tablet. In the end those pathetic researchers under influence claim that they showed something new about the eyes of old readers preferring high contrast, and do not hesitate to boldly incriminate readers based on their very subjectively chosen EGG waves and wild guesses : "This suggests that the overwhelming public opinion that digital reading media, though convenient, reduce the pleasure of reading is a cultural rather than a cognitive phenomenon." Finally, let us note that this research was not published in a prestigious science journal at all. No wonder. I wonder if the marketing branch of the German book industry is displeased by that, or just cared about one thing : how much the popular press would cover this research : not at all in Germany, it seems. Too bad ! Only a few English language newspapers quoted that old people preferred high contrast. What a waste of money...and paper ! Last edited by Lbooker; 11-13-2013 at 07:27 AM. |
|
11-12-2013, 09:27 AM | #57 | |
Hybrid reader
Posts: 161
Karma: 1132216
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: USA
Device: Kindle Paperwhite 2; Sony PRS-350
|
Quote:
Humans just don't do objectivity except in very limited and controlled circumstances. Even then it's wise to remain skeptical. Reading from screens - particularly given the multiplication of different types of screens in recent years - is too new of an activity for it to be well understood yet. We're all too used to the old ways to know how the young will adapt. They're seldom limited in the same ways we oldsters are. |
|
11-12-2013, 09:29 AM | #58 |
The Dank Side of the Moon
Posts: 35,872
Karma: 118716293
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Device: Kindle2; Kindle Fire
|
Ahhh, German....
Last edited by kennyc; 11-12-2013 at 09:33 AM. |
11-12-2013, 10:02 AM | #59 | |
Wizard
Posts: 4,812
Karma: 26912940
Join Date: Apr 2010
Device: sony PRS-T1 and T3, Kobo Mini and Aura HD, Tablet
|
Quote:
Otherwise some might start to doubt your veracity. BTW that was Sil_liS who found the one article not kennyc as you can plainly see if you look back at your post #56. I'd be a tad embarrassed over that one. Helen |
|
11-12-2013, 10:17 AM | #60 |
Member
Posts: 17
Karma: 10
Join Date: Sep 2013
Device: none
|
i guess it's part of the evolution process really, since we are so accustomed to carrying our tablet/phone with us anywhere we go, it's a matter of convenience in the end. a device able to 'carry' thousands of books wherever you may roam.
|
Tags |
news |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Researchers stack E Ink paper like real paper (video) | Alexander Turcic | News | 11 | 08-20-2013 12:13 PM |
E-paper screen contrast is about right | Fastolfe | General Discussions | 14 | 12-28-2010 09:17 PM |
Quantum Paper claims to revolutionize electronic display/paper industry | Alexander Turcic | News | 12 | 04-09-2008 11:20 PM |
Paper Four: Digital paper that talks to you | Alexander Turcic | News | 10 | 06-09-2007 10:28 AM |
PVI delays flexible e-paper to end-2007 / color e-paper in 2009 | Alexander Turcic | News | 1 | 06-08-2007 03:52 AM |