10-30-2009, 11:06 PM | #1 |
Banned
Posts: 135
Karma: 366
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Cyberspace
Device: The Bindle: no batteries, hand-cranked pages, mobile, underlineable
|
Professor sees e-reading "changing the very nature of humanity"
thread closed
Last edited by danbloom; 11-13-2009 at 01:09 AM. Reason: line |
10-30-2009, 11:14 PM | #2 |
Connoisseur
Posts: 70
Karma: 6050
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Oklahoma!
Device: Kindle Paperwhite, Android phone with Kindle app, Kindle 4 in reserve
|
I disagree on one fundamental thing--For most of us, our brains are getting updated all the time....We do it through learning and practice. Even learning to read is a major software upgrade that everyone on this forum did when they were five years old or so. The pace of upgrades slows down for most people after their late teens, but for many of us (and I suspect most of the people in this forum) it never permanently stops while we are alive and conscious! If there is a disadvantage to reading on screen, I suspect our brains will learn to do better at it if we keep practicing.
Nits aside, I have to agree that when I write things, I seem to do a better job of editing and catching faux pas when I am looking at paper rather than a computer screen. I've never thought about how reading on my Kindle might be a different experience. I certainly feel like I get as much out of the book as I do on paper, but who knows....? |
Advert | |
|
10-30-2009, 11:28 PM | #3 |
Banned
Posts: 135
Karma: 366
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Cyberspace
Device: The Bindle: no batteries, hand-cranked pages, mobile, underlineable
|
thread closed
Last edited by danbloom; 11-13-2009 at 01:09 AM. Reason: darren garrison |
10-30-2009, 11:36 PM | #4 | ||
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 19,832
Karma: 11844413
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tampa, FL USA
Device: Kindle Touch
|
Quote:
Quote:
BOb |
||
10-31-2009, 12:05 AM | #5 |
Banned
Posts: 1,767
Karma: 2520493
Join Date: Oct 2008
Device: Nexus 7, jetBook-Lite, jetBook mini, Toshiba Thrive, JETBOOK COLOR
|
Unlike paper text, when the brain attempts to read electronic text it is distracted by the technology. The requirements of clicking and waiting. The possibilities of choice (links and ads, for example) also serve to confuse the brain and interfere with the reading process online or on any kind of screen-reading platform.
I agree with this statement when we are talking about eBook readers with E-ink screen. |
Advert | |
|
10-31-2009, 12:31 AM | #6 |
Professional Contrarian
Posts: 2,045
Karma: 3289631
Join Date: Mar 2009
Device: Kindle 4 No Touchie
|
*Yawn*
Guterman's opinions would be much more impressive if they were based in actual research (e.g. FMRI scans) rather than opinion. I'm sure he's quite intelligent, but facts > opinion. It doesn't help that he cites Kurzweil as a resource. RK is a very smart individual, but his ideas about the Singularity are tech-optimistic nearly to the point of lunacy. He also doesn't seem to distinguish between the ebook experience (which is static, and almost as distraction-free as paper) and the screen experience (which is loaded with distractions). So Dan, are you just going to spend all your time looking for people to agree with you that reading in any electronic form is somehow "different?" |
10-31-2009, 12:56 AM | #7 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 10,270
Karma: 1126878541
Join Date: Oct 2009
Device: Astak Pocket PRO, iPod Touch, PRS-650
|
Quote:
Wouldn't need a reader. Just plug the sd card into the side of my head and the data will transfer. |
|
10-31-2009, 01:00 AM | #8 |
Banned
Posts: 135
Karma: 366
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Cyberspace
Device: The Bindle: no batteries, hand-cranked pages, mobile, underlineable
|
thread closed
Last edited by danbloom; 11-13-2009 at 01:09 AM. Reason: darren garrison |
10-31-2009, 01:08 AM | #9 |
Zealot
Posts: 123
Karma: 150001
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Long Beach, CA
Device: Color Nook, Kindle 2, Palm III, eBookWise, HP Jornada
|
Okay, what's the deal with 'real books,' here. Sure, the medium affects the message. Shifting from scrolls to pages changed the way reading happened. So did the migration from clay tablets to papyrus, and from caligraphy to print. But when was the last time you heard someone mourning for that scroll, so they could just roll through the book without having to take their eyes off the page?
eBooks are real books. They just don't kill trees. Rob Preece Publisher, BooksForABuck.com |
10-31-2009, 02:33 AM | #10 | |
Connoisseur
Posts: 70
Karma: 6050
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Oklahoma!
Device: Kindle Paperwhite, Android phone with Kindle app, Kindle 4 in reserve
|
Quote:
I don't have any better ideas than to fall back on the reasons cited for eInk allegedly being better than computer screens for electronic books--Perhaps the brain has to work a little harder on a backlit screen, and our reading comprehension suffers because of the distraction. I'm old enough (same age as Madonna and Michael Jackson!) that I had firmly learned my reading habits long before I ever dreamed of reading on a computer screen. It may be that for younger people who grew up reading regularly on a screen, they don't have that issue. Anyone under 30 out there who wants to give their experience? |
|
10-31-2009, 03:17 AM | #11 | |
Wizard
Posts: 1,952
Karma: 213930
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Middelfart, Denmark
Device: Kindle paper white
|
Quote:
I read books for the content, and the e-reader is perfect for me... When I find a book I really like, I like to read it again and again... Paper books just doesn't last... ... and then there was a talk about borrowing books from the library... disgusting! |
|
10-31-2009, 06:35 AM | #12 | ||
Wizard
Posts: 3,490
Karma: 5239563
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Denmark
Device: Kindle 3|iPad air|iPhone 4S
|
Quote:
Quote:
Apart from this, I would guess that we have become used to reading differently on the screen. When I read web pages for example, I skim more than when reading a book, and that habit might carry over. |
||
10-31-2009, 08:33 AM | #13 | |
Bah, humbug!
Posts: 39,072
Karma: 157049943
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chesapeake, VA, USA
Device: Kindle Oasis, iPad Pro, & a Samsung Galaxy S9.
|
Quote:
Of course, the easiest way for me to catch all my errors is to post online first, then re-read my post a week or so later -- after the world has had a chance to see how big idiot I can be! |
|
10-31-2009, 08:56 AM | #14 |
Time Enough at Last
Posts: 387
Karma: 1151316
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: New England
Device: iPad 3, iPhone 5, Kindle 3, Fire, Sony PRS-350
|
"Not having expertise in brain science and biology, I cannot explain..."
Although somewhat interesting and thought-provoking, I believe most of this article is bogus. Something that I, a former English major in college, might have written after I had eaten a potato with a spot of mustard on it... |
10-31-2009, 08:56 AM | #15 | |
Wizard
Posts: 1,213
Karma: 12890
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Amherst, Massachusetts, USA
Device: Sony PRS-505
|
Quote:
By far the most effective way I've found to proofread my writing is to activate some kind text-to-speech system on my computer and have it read what I've written back to me. Usually, I'll read the thing at the same time. Mistakes are very easy to find when a misspelled work is mispronounced, or a missing word is skipped when spoken. Reading along also slows me down, since the Text-to-speech system reads fairly slowly. Otherwise, it's too easy to read your own writing too quickly, since it's so familiar. My e-reader doesn't have this capability--I use my computer--but if I had a Kindle 2+, I could do this portably, thereby exploiting the technology to make editing easier. Anyway, if you don't have this feature on your device, recent versions of Adobe Acrobat and Adobe Reader usually have a menu item to read a PDF for you. (The text-to-speech system it calls is not from it, though, but just the default one on your computer. I use Festival with some of the Festvox on my linux system, but I begrudgingly admit that Microsoft Anna, whom you'll get on Vista and Win7, is a pretty nice voice--Microsoft Sam on XP is not nearly as nice. No clue what there is for mac.) The article is sheer windbaggery. I'm a philosophy professor myself, so I've got a finely tuned windbaggery detector, since it's unfortunately so common in academia. He makes grandiose claims, all based on one example. Maybe the rest of it is true, maybe it isn't, but you can't be justified in drawing such fantastical conclusions on the basis of one thing, using only your own personal experience. In my own experience, switching from screen to e-Ink has the same advantages of switching to paper. Last edited by frabjous; 10-31-2009 at 09:12 AM. Reason: should have done it for this post! |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Changing "Save Template" not working? | monkbythesea | Calibre | 10 | 08-04-2010 03:30 AM |
Changing book titles of epubs (specifically removing "Barnes & Noble Classic Series" | jettrue | Calibre | 3 | 08-03-2010 09:02 AM |
Feedback requested on ePub ("My Antonia") rendering in various Reading Software | Jon Noring | Reading and Management | 2 | 11-12-2009 07:19 AM |
Silicon Alley Insider: "Kindle A Year Old, Hasn't Changed Reading... Yet" | curtw | News | 1 | 11-20-2008 05:49 PM |
"Reading things electronically is a dissatisfying experience" - Publisher crying | searcher | News | 49 | 03-26-2008 10:37 AM |