Amazon Defends Pedophile Book

drofgnal · 11-11-2010, 06:48 AM

Saw this today in USATODAY

http://content.usatoday.com/communit...and-pleasure/1

I'm all for not having censorship, but this crosses the line of common decency. Amazon CS will here from me on this. Not selling this book is not censorship, just being a responsible vendor.

Cpl Punishment · 11-11-2010, 07:01 AM

Looks like they pulled it....

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/11/11...-amid-outrage/

LDBoblo · 11-11-2010, 07:12 AM

Too bad really. My uncle could have used this book.

tubemonkey · 11-11-2010, 07:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drofgnal

I'm all for not having censorship, but this crosses the line of common decency. Amazon CS will here from me on this. Not selling this book is not censorship, just being a responsible vendor.

Amazon is a private company, so it's not censorship for them to pull any book for any reason.

tubemonkey · 11-11-2010, 07:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cpl Punishment

Looks like they pulled it....

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/11/11...-amid-outrage/

Boycotts are cool.

Mike L · 11-11-2010, 08:08 AM

Quote:

Amazon Defends Pedophile Book

The title of this thread is misleading. Amazon never defended the book. They defended the right of the publisher to offer it.

Cpl Punishment · 11-11-2010, 08:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike L

The title of this thread is misleading. Amazon never defended the book. They defended the right of the publisher to offer it.

Not sure if thats a step up or not.....(In my opinion)

tubemonkey · 11-11-2010, 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cpl Punishment

Not sure if thats a step up or not.....(In my opinion)

As long as it's legal to sell such works, the morality of such sales is in the eye of the beholder.

Worldwalker · 11-11-2010, 08:37 AM

The book appalls me. Then again, so do certain other books best discussed down in the "politics and religion" forum, and those concepts have, sad to say, probably caused a great deal more damage over the years than this fool's book (pedophilia, while reprehensible, doesn't generally start wars). How far should one go in demanding that a bookseller not sell a book?

And when we get there, with the publishers -- by law or by choice -- only selling "safe" books -- is that really where we want to be?

Cpl Punishment · 11-11-2010, 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tubemonkey

As long as it's legal to sell such works, the morality of such sales is in the eye of the beholder.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Worldwalker

The book appalls me. Then again, so do certain other books best discussed down in the "politics and religion" forum, and those concepts have, sad to say, probably caused a great deal more damage over the years than this fool's book (pedophilia, while reprehensible, doesn't generally start wars). How far should one go in demanding that a bookseller not sell a book?

And when we get there, with the publishers -- by law or by choice -- only selling "safe" books -- is that really where we want to be?

You both are right of course..I just didnt know Amazon took the highter ground by defending the publisher and not the book...Was all the same to me...

rhadin · 11-11-2010, 08:47 AM

The answer is Fahrenheit 451. The question is: What should we do with offensive books?

The question without an acceptable answer is this: Who should decide what books are offensive?

Worldwalker · 11-11-2010, 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rhadin

The question without an acceptable answer is this: Who should decide what books are offensive?

The authority that can decide someone else can't read a book because it offends you can decide you can't read a book because it offends someone else.

desertgrandma · 11-11-2010, 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Worldwalker

The authority that can decide someone else can't read a book because it offends you can decide you can't read a book because it offends someone else.

b*****t

We're talking a book that promotes sexual penetration of babies and children.

By an adult male.

And THEN suggests a light sentence for perpetrators.

If you aren't outraged by this......if you can't see the difference between something that "offends" and something that is totally unacceptable, you are part of the problem.

Catlady · 11-11-2010, 09:12 AM

This is not a First Amendment or censorship issue. No government body ordered Amazon not to sell the book, or questioned Amazon's right to sell it. (FYI, this was a self-published book that apparently was published through the Amazon company CreateSpace.) But consumers have a right to judge Amazon by its sale of such a book, and that's what happened.

durkinrobinson · 11-11-2010, 09:20 AM

From a business standpoint, they made the right decision. I'd rather not do business with a company that sells a book guiding people through the act of having sex with children, and then profits from those sales.

Sidenote: I'm a former teacher who gave students extra credit to read banned books and I'm also a writer whose columns have exposed local politicians advocating censorship in schools and libraries.

Two different issues, in my opinion.

11-11-2010, 06:48 AM	#1
drofgnal Wizard Posts: 1,227 Karma: 7838248 Join Date: Dec 2009 Device: Ipad Pro/Kindle Oasis 3/iPhone 13 Pro Max	Amazon Defends Pedophile Book Saw this today in USATODAY http://content.usatoday.com/communit...and-pleasure/1 I'm all for not having censorship, but this crosses the line of common decency. Amazon CS will here from me on this. Not selling this book is not censorship, just being a responsible vendor.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Gnelfs - A Mother Defends her Daughter Against Demons	SidneyW	Self-Promotions by Authors and Publishers	6	01-21-2011 06:42 AM
Version epub du livre « Confessions d’un pédophile, l’impossible filtrage du net »	NicolasR	E-Books	10	03-09-2010 11:10 AM
Government Collectif : Confessions d’un pédophile l’impossible filtrage du web, v.1, 02/2010	NicolasR	ePub Books	1	03-02-2010 03:37 PM
Amazing Amazon New Book	jmb	Reading Recommendations	4	08-17-2009 05:17 PM
Amazon e-book reader	Chrism	Amazon Kindle	24	09-18-2007 10:41 AM

11-11-2010, 07:01 AM	#2
Cpl Punishment Guru Posts: 682 Karma: 4156546 Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: On The Move Device: Ipad 103rd Gen	Looks like they pulled it.... http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/11/11...-amid-outrage/

11-11-2010, 07:12 AM	#3
LDBoblo Wizard Posts: 1,385 Karma: 16056 Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Asia Device: Kindle 3 WiFi, Sony PRS-505	Too bad really. My uncle could have used this book.

11-11-2010, 08:37 AM	#9
Worldwalker Curmudgeon Posts: 3,085 Karma: 722357 Join Date: Feb 2010 Device: PRS-505	The book appalls me. Then again, so do certain other books best discussed down in the "politics and religion" forum, and those concepts have, sad to say, probably caused a great deal more damage over the years than this fool's book (pedophilia, while reprehensible, doesn't generally start wars). How far should one go in demanding that a bookseller not sell a book? And when we get there, with the publishers -- by law or by choice -- only selling "safe" books -- is that really where we want to be?

11-11-2010, 08:47 AM	#11
rhadin Literacy = Understanding Posts: 4,833 Karma: 59674358 Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: The World of Books Device: Nook, Nook Tablet	The answer is Fahrenheit 451. The question is: What should we do with offensive books? The question without an acceptable answer is this: Who should decide what books are offensive?

11-11-2010, 09:12 AM	#14
Catlady Grand Sorcerer Posts: 7,345 Karma: 52398889 Join Date: Oct 2010 Device: Kindle Fire, Kindle Paperwhite, AGPTek Bluetooth Clip	This is not a First Amendment or censorship issue. No government body ordered Amazon not to sell the book, or questioned Amazon's right to sell it. (FYI, this was a self-published book that apparently was published through the Amazon company CreateSpace.) But consumers have a right to judge Amazon by its sale of such a book, and that's what happened.

11-11-2010, 09:20 AM	#15
durkinrobinson Lovechild Posts: 90 Karma: 100000 Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Tampa Bay Device: Kindle	From a business standpoint, they made the right decision. I'd rather not do business with a company that sells a book guiding people through the act of having sex with children, and then profits from those sales. Sidenote: I'm a former teacher who gave students extra credit to read banned books and I'm also a writer whose columns have exposed local politicians advocating censorship in schools and libraries. Two different issues, in my opinion.

Advert

Advert