08-21-2014, 10:23 AM | #1 | |
Guru
Posts: 704
Karma: 1622328
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: USA
Device: Kindle Oasis, OnePlus Nord
|
Report: Readers absorb less on Kindles than on Paper
Written up for the Guardian:
Quote:
What do we think? |
|
08-21-2014, 10:28 AM | #2 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 5,658
Karma: 66420972
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Libra 2, iPadMini4, iPad4, MBP; support other Kobo/Kindles
|
I think that "The Elizabeth George study included only two experienced Kindle users". Out of fifty subjects.
|
Advert | |
|
08-21-2014, 10:55 AM | #3 |
Wizard
Posts: 1,179
Karma: 11573197
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: London, UK
Device: Voyage
|
I haven't really noticed a difference "absorbing" when I read on the Kindle rather than a pbook.
However, when reading on the Kindle, more often than not I have no idea of the name of the author and title of whatever it is I am reading because I don't see the book cover every time I pick it up or put it down |
08-21-2014, 11:12 AM | #4 |
Wizard
Posts: 3,144
Karma: 8426142
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Device: Kindle PW2, Kindle Voyage, Kindle DXG, Boox M90, Kobo Aura HD
|
I can't remember squat, delivery method is the least of my problems.
|
08-21-2014, 11:16 AM | #5 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 27,549
Karma: 193191846
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
|
And why on earth is it "Kindles" vs paper?
I frankly don't trust the results of studies that include ANY inexperienced ereaders as subjects. Until such time as the device "goes away" for a reader, the results are going to be pretty irrelevant. I'd have no problem with empirical evidence, but most of the studies I've seen along these lines seem to be being conducted by people who are already convinced of ereading's "inferiority." The word "Kindle" should never have been used (in the study or the article). It's not relevant to what's being "studied." Do the test again using only experienced ereaders (using the eink device to which they're already acclimated) and see what the results are. THAT I'd be interested in. Last edited by DiapDealer; 08-21-2014 at 11:31 AM. |
Advert | |
|
08-21-2014, 11:29 AM | #6 |
monkey on the fringe
Posts: 45,477
Karma: 158151390
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Seattle Metro
Device: Moto E6, Echo Show
|
Since I read for pleasure, there's nothing to absorb.
|
08-21-2014, 11:38 AM | #7 | |||
Guru
Posts: 704
Karma: 1622328
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: USA
Device: Kindle Oasis, OnePlus Nord
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
08-21-2014, 11:41 AM | #8 | |
Omnivorous
Posts: 3,281
Karma: 27978909
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Rural NW Oregon
Device: Kindle Voyage, Kindle Fire HD, Kindle 3, KPW1
|
Quote:
|
|
08-21-2014, 12:23 PM | #9 | |
Guru
Posts: 704
Karma: 1622328
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: USA
Device: Kindle Oasis, OnePlus Nord
|
I wonder if a progress bar could effectively replicate the experience of progress that the researchers are talking about.
On my Kindle (5-button) there is a little progress bar at the bottom that tracks your position both in the book and within the chapter you are currently reading. I look at it frequently. I mean... do people have this problem with movies? And there is no stack of paper being shifted from one hand to the next when you watch a movie. Sure, there is the passage of time, but you have the exact same thing happening when you are reading an e-book. Quote:
Last edited by Anthem; 08-21-2014 at 12:34 PM. |
|
08-21-2014, 12:52 PM | #10 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 27,549
Karma: 193191846
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
|
Quote:
As far as tracking overall "progress" goes, I've discovered it serves no useful purpose in my reading. So I turn all progress indicators, page/location counts off and just read. I don't care where I stop--and I find that just knowing I'm getting "close" to the end is a distraction that causes me to start making assumptions/predictions about what I'm reading that I wouldn't make otherwise. So unless an instructor says; "Don't read beyond page xxx," then I don't really see the point of monitoring progress myself. And if I was enjoying what I was reading, I'd probably ignore that instructor's directions anyway. |
|
08-21-2014, 01:00 PM | #11 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 11,305
Karma: 43993832
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Monroe Wisconsin
Device: K3, Kindle Paperwhite, Calibre, and Mobipocket for Pc (netbook)
|
I don't know about absorbing more or less details depending on the medium the book is presented in but I think I'm more likely to always have a book to hand using my Kindle than in any other medium available. I mean which is more portable? A 500 page book that weighs up to a lb and is up to 2" thick or a 500 page ebook that is less than .25" thick and weighs in at 8 ounces? I'll choose the ebook reader any time.
|
08-21-2014, 01:35 PM | #12 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 27,549
Karma: 193191846
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
|
I believe that anyone who finds themselves in the midst of paradigm/medium shift is going to be easily distracted by the fact that they're doing something different than their "old way" of doing that same thing. So of course their retention/absorption might suffer because of that in the interim. But I don't believe that effect need be permanent or irreversible, once the shift is made. Am I to believe that those who learned to read on stone tablets or scrolls represent the epitome of human reading-retention skills ... and that those skills have been in decline ever since? Of course not. Because once the personal shift has been made, reading is still reading is still reading. There is no point in testing people for ereading retention skills who haven't yet made that personal shift. Especially since nobody's being required to make the shift in the first place.
Last edited by DiapDealer; 08-21-2014 at 01:59 PM. |
08-21-2014, 01:37 PM | #13 |
Fanatic
Posts: 513
Karma: 2644386
Join Date: Apr 2012
Device: iPhone, Kindle Touch
|
In my particular case, this isn't an inherent fault of one technology over another.
I find that when I read too quickly, I am less likely to retain information. I find that I often choose to read more quickly on an e-reader, and thus potentially retain less. I can read just as quickly with paper and possibly suffer the same loss. |
08-21-2014, 01:47 PM | #14 |
Wizard
Posts: 2,895
Karma: 6995721
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Idaho, on the side of a mountain
Device: Kindle Oasis, Fire 3d Gen and 5th Gen and Samsung Tab S
|
|
08-21-2014, 01:56 PM | #15 | |
Guru
Posts: 704
Karma: 1622328
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: USA
Device: Kindle Oasis, OnePlus Nord
|
Quote:
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ebook readers (Kindles) in African education | fjtorres | News | 32 | 05-06-2012 03:06 AM |
Confused!!! and question about kindles and all e-readers | thuya1991 | Which one should I buy? | 32 | 06-12-2011 01:59 PM |
Brick & Mortar Bookstore Swaps Paper for Kindles | neilmarr | General Discussions | 33 | 02-02-2011 11:01 AM |
Spanish readers on Kindles-2 | toyote | Introduce Yourself | 7 | 12-13-2010 09:33 PM |
Credit Suisse Report on the future of ebook readers | anurag | News | 6 | 07-27-2009 06:27 PM |