|
View Poll Results: Should voting results be hidden or visible in 2012? | |||
All Book Club Polls in 2012 should be Hidden. | 17 | 47.22% | |
All Book Club Polls in 2012 should be Viewable. | 7 | 19.44% | |
Each month, we should alternate between Hidden and Viewable. | 10 | 27.78% | |
Other (Please explain in comments). | 2 | 5.56% | |
Voters: 36. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
11-27-2011, 08:42 AM | #61 |
Close to the Edit!
Posts: 9,797
Karma: 267994408
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis, Amazon Fire 8", Kindle 6"
|
I think I agree with you, even though I voted for alternating, as I think it will be an interesting experiment to see just how different the results from each method are.
|
11-27-2011, 09:10 AM | #62 | |
Resident Curmudgeon
Posts: 74,329
Karma: 129333690
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Roslindale, Massachusetts
Device: Kobo Libra 2, Kobo Aura H2O, PRS-650, PRS-T1, nook STR, PW3
|
Quote:
So why have open votes when we know the results are incorrect? We shouldn't. We've seen based on the two hidden votes that hidden votes are much more accurate. So if you voted alternating just for the experiment (in the second poll), you can change to all hidden now that you know that open votes are a big fat fail. |
|
11-27-2011, 09:30 AM | #63 |
Wizard
Posts: 3,388
Karma: 14190103
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Berlin
Device: Cybook, iRex, PB, Onyx
|
Jon, maybe you're right that hidden votes are more accurate (for me personally not, my vote is not dependent on the score) but have they lead to more people reading the book or participating in the discussion thread? I would accept a (slightly) less accurate vote if it leads to more lively discussions in the voting and in the discussion thread. And for the liveliness of the voting thread hidden voting is a killer.
That's why I voted for alternating the kind of voting every month: to have an impression of the overall result - that is the accurateness of votes, the number of people actually reading the books, the number of people discussing the books. |
11-27-2011, 09:58 AM | #64 | |
Close to the Edit!
Posts: 9,797
Karma: 267994408
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis, Amazon Fire 8", Kindle 6"
|
Quote:
|
|
11-27-2011, 10:12 AM | #65 | |
Series Addict
Posts: 6,180
Karma: 167189477
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Florida, USA
Device: Kindle Paperwhite (2nd Gen)
|
Quote:
Oh well. As I stated in the December thread: I plan to make this book club a part of my 2012 reading challenge by reading all winners, as long as I can find them at reasonable prices for my Kindle. I hope I have a better year next year than this one. I think I only participated in 4 discussions, with this month possibly being a 5th (I really don't know yet). My biggest concern going forward are the personality conflicts that have arisen this year. I really do believe it has affected some of the votes overall (policy wise and book selections) and I'm hoping beyond hope that it will not happen next year. I agree with sun surfer that we should try to handle all of our club process decisions this year and then have a moratorium on changes until at the very earliest 2013. Although, it would be great if we were happy with said changes and didn't really need to make anymore for a long while. |
|
11-28-2011, 10:14 PM | #66 | |
Series Addict
Posts: 6,180
Karma: 167189477
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Florida, USA
Device: Kindle Paperwhite (2nd Gen)
|
Quote:
|
|
11-28-2011, 10:22 PM | #67 |
Bah, humbug!
Posts: 39,073
Karma: 157049943
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chesapeake, VA, USA
Device: Kindle Oasis, iPad Pro, & a Samsung Galaxy S9.
|
Sheesh!
|
11-29-2011, 12:37 AM | #68 |
Connoisseur
Posts: 57
Karma: 39356
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: USA
Device: Kindle, iPhone
|
How about we split the difference and make every third month's poll viewable?
|
11-29-2011, 12:54 AM | #69 |
Bah, humbug!
Posts: 39,073
Karma: 157049943
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chesapeake, VA, USA
Device: Kindle Oasis, iPad Pro, & a Samsung Galaxy S9.
|
My thoughts exactly. So in 2012, March, June, September, and December will be viewable, and the other eight months will be hidden. Then toward the end of next year, we can have another poll to determine if folks' feelings have changed.
|
11-29-2011, 01:16 AM | #70 | ||
Series Addict
Posts: 6,180
Karma: 167189477
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Florida, USA
Device: Kindle Paperwhite (2nd Gen)
|
Quote:
Quote:
So with the new order (see Tom's post/approval here in the Administration: New years reading categories thread) : Thriller/Suspense, Classic #1, NonFiction & Classic #2 will be open. Well, that's two items of discussion decided - categories & poll views - so what's next on the agenda? Last edited by Nyssa; 11-29-2011 at 01:19 AM. |
||
11-29-2011, 01:21 AM | #71 |
Series Addict
Posts: 6,180
Karma: 167189477
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Florida, USA
Device: Kindle Paperwhite (2nd Gen)
|
Oh yes, Sun Surfer wanted to discuss Tiered Voting and a year long Moratorium on changes.
Last edited by Nyssa; 11-29-2011 at 01:30 AM. Reason: Typos |
11-29-2011, 08:01 AM | #72 | |
Nameless Being
|
Quote:
I am happy with the new monthly categories and the polling distribution (hidden vs. open) is fine as well. It seems that if the latter is to be accepted for 2012 that would leave the two tier voting off the table until 2013? There is also the issue of book nominations remotely matching the category for the month and/or how many times a year the same book may be nominated? "year long Moratorium on changes" Yes, and set in concrete so that anyone who brings these issues up during 2012, well everyone can be sure that he/or she is just talking to themselves. |
|
11-29-2011, 08:09 AM | #73 |
Bah, humbug!
Posts: 39,073
Karma: 157049943
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chesapeake, VA, USA
Device: Kindle Oasis, iPad Pro, & a Samsung Galaxy S9.
|
Yes to year-long moratorium on changes. I don't think we should enact any more changes until 2013. Although we may be voting on any changes later in the year, no changes will take effect until January 1, 2013.
|
11-29-2011, 08:21 AM | #74 | ||
Series Addict
Posts: 6,180
Karma: 167189477
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Florida, USA
Device: Kindle Paperwhite (2nd Gen)
|
Quote:
Quote:
Hamlet, I understand what your saying about leaving two tier voting until 2013, but I do not know if Sun Surfer was proposing the two tier voting regardless of the "open" vs "hidden" issue. She would have to make that decision, unless Tom wants it tabled. I don't mind either way, I just want everyone to be able to get their concerns out now, while we have still have 4 or 5 weeks left for discussions. As to book nominations *shrug*. I think things got silly with that, and people in general were being snarky. I honestly believe that if a book is nominated "inappropriately" it will be ignored by the majority; as stated in my Storm Front in February/Romance example. |
||
11-29-2011, 10:43 AM | #75 | |
languorous autodidact ✦
Posts: 4,235
Karma: 44637926
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: smiling with the rising sun
Device: onyx boox poke 2 colour, kindle voyage
|
Quote:
However, I must wonder why we are not having a poll on tiered? There has been ample support for it over the months and here now (and probably would've been more support for it posted now if I'd posted the suggestion in a different thread and not a non-stickied thread on a closed poll that many members may not be reading any more). After all, you did OK my bringing it up to see what the majority wants, and it did get support, but now you won't let us vote on it? We still have a few more weeks before the new year (really we have til the 20th of December which is when the new year threads start) to discuss it. Perhaps the votes would be against it, and that's fine, but then we'd know what the majority wants. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Which logos should have made it into the voting (if any)? | ste9hen | Feedback | 13 | 01-24-2008 02:44 PM |