Two different strategies: palmOne vs. PocketPC

Colin Dunstan · 10-15-2004, 05:23 AM

Larry Garfield from Infosyncworld looks at the different design strategies of palmOne and PPC-based vendors, and muses on what it says about the way they think. This is an excellent read and mirrors exactly what a lot of our members have been discussing lately:

Where HP and Dell both think in terms of feature count, palmOne, rather out of necessity, tends to tailor its markets more. That's why, according to palmOne anyway, the T5 doesn't have Wi-Fi[...]That's not to say that palmOne doesn't need a bigger push. Next to the equally-priced non-novel but very flashy X50 Advanced, the T5 just doesn't seem impressive, even if it is one of the most feature-rich Palm OS handhelds to date.

So what does the editor of the article suggest? -- That palmOne is better hurrying up to release a Cobalt handheld that could hopefully compete with the latest HP and Dell PPC devices.

Brad · 10-15-2004, 08:09 AM

Good article.

I think they are right you need to have enough glitz to stay on the consumer radar and robbing the parts bin like they did with the T5 may produce a competent handheld, but it lacks glitz.

OTOH, Palm seems to have identified a real niche market: the low end $200 and less consumer PDA.

Bob Russell · 10-15-2004, 08:12 AM

I think the T5 might still work if it's solid. People who buy glitz will put up with more problems than people who buy "plain and reliable". Palm is "plain and reliable" but the reliable part for T5 is in question. Hopefully they will realize reliable is important and take care of patches efficiently and effectively.

ignatz · 10-15-2004, 09:03 AM

Yes, but the price point for the T5 is much too high. It would make more sense if it were at least $100 cheaper. You pay extra for glitz. Plain and reliable should be more affordable. That's often the whole point.

10-15-2004, 05:23 AM	#1
Colin Dunstan Is papyrophobic! Posts: 1,926 Karma: 1009999 Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: USA Device: Dell Axim	Two different strategies: palmOne vs. PocketPC Larry Garfield from Infosyncworld looks at the different design strategies of palmOne and PPC-based vendors, and muses on what it says about the way they think. This is an excellent read and mirrors exactly what a lot of our members have been discussing lately: Where HP and Dell both think in terms of feature count, palmOne, rather out of necessity, tends to tailor its markets more. That's why, according to palmOne anyway, the T5 doesn't have Wi-Fi[...]That's not to say that palmOne doesn't need a bigger push. Next to the equally-priced non-novel but very flashy X50 Advanced, the T5 just doesn't seem impressive, even if it is one of the most feature-rich Palm OS handhelds to date. So what does the editor of the article suggest? -- That palmOne is better hurrying up to release a Cobalt handheld that could hopefully compete with the latest HP and Dell PPC devices.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
How To Deal With New Pricing Strategies (and get noticed?)	poohbear_nc	General Discussions	22	03-19-2010 02:34 PM
Sell games for PocketPC & Palm & Symbian - Make me an offer	Nate the great	Flea Market	4	04-30-2008 08:51 PM
RIM outgrowing palmOne?	Alexander Turcic	Lounge	2	02-02-2005 01:29 PM
Sony Clie back running PocketPC ?!	Colin Dunstan	Lounge	7	08-10-2004 12:42 AM

10-15-2004, 08:09 AM	#2
Brad Zealot Posts: 107 Karma: 201 Join Date: Sep 2004 Device: Cybook Gen3 / EB1150 /iPhone	Good article. I think they are right you need to have enough glitz to stay on the consumer radar and robbing the parts bin like they did with the T5 may produce a competent handheld, but it lacks glitz. OTOH, Palm seems to have identified a real niche market: the low end $200 and less consumer PDA.

10-15-2004, 08:12 AM	#3
Bob Russell Recovering Gadget Addict Posts: 5,381 Karma: 676161 Join Date: May 2004 Location: Pittsburgh, PA Device: iPad	I think the T5 might still work if it's solid. People who buy glitz will put up with more problems than people who buy "plain and reliable". Palm is "plain and reliable" but the reliable part for T5 is in question. Hopefully they will realize reliable is important and take care of patches efficiently and effectively.

10-15-2004, 09:03 AM	#4
ignatz mechanoholic Posts: 582 Karma: 1000217 Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Sarasota, FL Device: Nook STR/iPhone 4S/EVO 4G	Yes, but the price point for the T5 is much too high. It would make more sense if it were at least $100 cheaper. You pay extra for glitz. Plain and reliable should be more affordable. That's often the whole point.