10-04-2012, 10:28 AM | #16 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,342
Karma: 52398889
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: Kindle Fire, Kindle Paperwhite, AGPTek Bluetooth Clip
|
The focus should be on stopping the uploaders; leave the downloaders alone. Obviously, if material isn't available on the file-sharing sites in the first place, it can't be downloaded.
|
10-04-2012, 10:29 AM | #17 |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
So you think that downloaders should be able to break the law with impunity? Both are equally guilty. It takes two to tango, as the saying goes.
|
Advert | |
|
10-04-2012, 10:47 AM | #18 |
Media Junkie
Posts: 278
Karma: 2039392
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Device: Kobo Libra H20, Kindle PW
|
I think the article is absolutely spot on. It's not advocating unauthorized downloading (I refuse to call it theft or piracy, because it's neither), it's merely outlining today's reality.
Whatever your stance on downloading, from being in favor of jail time for downloaders, to donation-based anarchy (not naming any names), or somewhere in between, you have to admit one self-evident truth: that the Film/Music/Book industries have failed to adapt to the modern realities of the digital world (to put it mildly) & have handled the situation in just about the worst, most brainlessly heavy-handed way possible. I believe in paying for my content - to support the artists & creative types, NOT to line the pockets of fat cat executives. With entities like the RIAA using scare tactics, bullying, and trying to throw people in jail or fine them into bankruptcy, and trying to pass ridiculous legislation like SOPA, I certainly have zero sympathy for big media companies. Last edited by usuallee; 10-04-2012 at 10:49 AM. Reason: minor grammatical error |
10-04-2012, 10:56 AM | #19 |
Wizard
Posts: 2,095
Karma: 11315768
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: UK
Device: Kindle, Kobo Touch, Nook SimpleTouch
|
Absolutely. You will never defeat piracy as long as it's cheaper than buying something, which it seems to me it always will be.
The solution is to make it as easy and cheap and friendly as possible to buy something. I think this is why the likes of the Kindle store, iTunes/App Store and Steam actually succeed as well as they do. |
10-04-2012, 11:12 AM | #20 |
Member
Posts: 21
Karma: 500010
Join Date: Jan 2011
Device: kindle
|
I think there are two kinds of 'piracy' (buying something that breaks normal trading rules):
1. Buying out of neccessity (product not available 'legally' or you can't afford the proper price). 2. Buying something because it's cheaper and you are greedy. Until people/society changes we are stuck with piracy. |
Advert | |
|
10-04-2012, 11:14 AM | #21 |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
Hmmm. Not being able to afford something hardly makes downloading entertainment a "necessity" does it? There are all sorts of things in the world that I can't afford, but that doesn't justify my taking them without paying.
|
10-04-2012, 11:20 AM | #22 |
Cultist
Posts: 195
Karma: 8624438
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: UK
Device: Sony PRS 505, Kobo Mini, Kobo Glo, Kobo Forma, Kindle DX
|
If something is cheap enough, and available easily enough, there are many people who will pay rather than go looking for pirated content.
I don't buy DVDs often; if I do they usually have to be sub-£3, and/or something that I like so much that I'll pay more for, and are bought purely on a whim during shopping trips. I don't use Netflix, because I don't sit down to passively watch something very often. If there were a service that charged a throwaway amount (such as £1) to rent a movie/tv series for a week, I'd probably use fairly frequently; £1 doesn't sound like much, but it's £1 of my money more than nothing, and throwaway pricing can attract more purchases (as Apple's app store proves). |
10-04-2012, 11:21 AM | #23 |
Member
Posts: 21
Karma: 500010
Join Date: Jan 2011
Device: kindle
|
Not all books are for entertainment (college, work related, etc?) but I take your point.
|
10-04-2012, 11:24 AM | #24 | |
Geographically Restricted
Posts: 2,629
Karma: 14933353
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Perth, Australia
Device: Sony PRS-T3, Kindle Voyage, iPad Air2, Nexus7v2
|
Quote:
Honestly, there is always going to be an active filesharing community. the way forward is to reduce the amount of filesharing that is happening. Until the BPH's and the RIAA/MPAA lose their mid 20th century mindset and offer better distribution systems more in keeping with the modern digital age, that is simply not going to happen. |
|
10-04-2012, 11:56 AM | #25 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,342
Karma: 52398889
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: Kindle Fire, Kindle Paperwhite, AGPTek Bluetooth Clip
|
Quote:
They are not equally guilty. An uploader is potentially responsible for thousands upon thousands of lost sales for each upload. A downloader is potentially responsible for a single lost sale for each download--his or her own possible purchase. |
|
10-04-2012, 12:02 PM | #26 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 5,185
Karma: 25133758
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SF Bay Area, California, USA
Device: Pocketbook Touch HD3 (Past: Kobo Mini, PEZ, PRS-505, Clié)
|
EuroGamer covered this topic; they were speaking of video games, but it's even more true for books:
Quote:
All the big hype about The Evils Of Book Piracy have done, is convince a lot of avid readers that publishers think they're leeches for buying used books. |
|
10-04-2012, 12:04 PM | #27 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,342
Karma: 52398889
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: Kindle Fire, Kindle Paperwhite, AGPTek Bluetooth Clip
|
Quote:
|
|
10-04-2012, 12:13 PM | #28 |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
I don't think anyone's suggesting that people who circumvent copy protection for material they've legally bought should be prosecuted, but that's very different to illegally downloading material that's commercially available. That is wrong, and should be prosecuted.
|
10-04-2012, 12:15 PM | #29 | |
Guru
Posts: 932
Karma: 15752887
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Norway
Device: Ipad, kindle paperwhite
|
Quote:
No, I've not lost my mind. The hydra metafor is, in my opinion, very similar to what the big media houses is trying to do. Take the downloaders, one by one, and for each time they take one, the publicity makes two to take his/hers place. Reasearch* has shown that a few people who make a living out of the pirate sites is behind most of the pirated material "out there". Which, to me, makes sense. I, as an "ordinary" person, has no advantage from uploading "stuff". It is illegal, I could get in trouble over it, it takes space on my hard drives and my bandwidth. The ordinary person may or may not be tempted to download, and if you want to go after all the downloaders you need the weapons of PIPA and SOPA and whatnot. These are weapons of mass destruction, capable of destroying the openness and freedom of speech and so on. But the ordinary person has no interest in uploading. That is why, if one takes down the biggest uploaders, you reduce the big problem of piracy to a much smaller problem. It is easier to go after the few than the many; a stab through the hydras heart is easier than killing it head by head. Besides, it may not be neccessary to force sensorship and ruining the open internet to take down the hydra either. It is possible to use traditional methods (investigation, arrestation, charges and convictions) of the biggest uploaders with the means we have available today; there are some problems with international laws, US juristiction does not cover the entire earth and so on, but by rattling its sables, US have quite a bit of influence in other countries as well. I say again: this fight should not be about "rigth" or "wrong", nor about punishing all infrigers. The main goal should be to solve the problem with as light methods as possible. By spending just a fraction of the amount used on DRM schemes, lobbying for these socalled "acts", bribing politicians, TV commercials and whatnot, it could have been possible to take down many of the largest uploaders or sites. "Let the small fish go and focus on the big fish" has been fishers motto for a long time. If the MAFIAA (I just love that term) could follow the same motto, let the police and the courts focus on the biggest "fishes" out there instead of drowning the police and said courts with massive amounts of work, maybe we wouldn't find ourselves in this mess. Even Hercules, when cleaning Augias stables, had to start somewhere. Why not start with the big fishes and see what happens? I don't say that this will solve the problem of piracy, but it would limit it to a fraction of what it is today. Piracy is popular because you could find anything out there. By limiting the selection and availability by making it harder to run a pirate site pluss taking out the uploaders, I think it will become less popular. I know that it is far from easy to take down a site in our divided world, the piratebay farce has shown that. The original people behind the piratebay is sentenced to jail and gigantic fines, but the current owners are not affected. It is difficult, but far more productive if successfull. Remember what happened after Megaupload was taken down? Almost all similar sites shut down in the aftershock of the quake. It's easier, cheaper and more efficient that anything involving suing en masse. In my opinion, the MAFIAA are trying to solve the problem with far too heavy guns. They are using heavy artillery to take down Sparrows (sic!) instead of catching the big eagles, even though the big eagles are an easier target, even with traditional weaponry. *I don't find a link to this article. I think this was discussed in an earlier debate here, and I think I read it in one of the articles discussed in said debate, but I fail to remember which. Can anybody help with links here? Last edited by Iznogood; 10-04-2012 at 01:49 PM. |
|
10-04-2012, 12:20 PM | #30 |
Groupie
Posts: 182
Karma: 1316076
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Florida
Device: iPad
|
Thievery is part of human nature, hence it will never go away completely.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
'Kill Decision' everywhere but UK? | Suffolk Punch | General Discussions | 1 | 07-29-2012 06:51 AM |
Piracy Irony: Copyright firm fined after stealing music for anti-piracy ad. | spindlegirl | News | 4 | 07-21-2012 06:41 AM |
Anti-Piracy group wants to ban you from talking about piracy | Nate the great | News | 39 | 06-06-2012 05:20 AM |
To Kill a Mockigbird. . . | GlenBarrington | Lounge | 0 | 01-01-2012 10:05 AM |
Seriously thoughtful Could Netbooks Kill off the E-Reader? | Moejoe | Lounge | 63 | 07-18-2009 08:23 PM |