01-21-2010, 09:34 AM | #1 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 8,478
Karma: 5171130
Join Date: Jan 2006
Device: none
|
Popular Science eyeing e-book devices
In the same issue (on newsstands now) that features a blurb on the eDGe and an article on Mary Lou Jepsen, creator of the 3Qi display screen, Popular Science editor Mark Jannot confesses to being impatient that his science magazine hasn't made the transition to e-books yet:
Quote:
But Jannot apparently has hope for the Pixel Qi screen technology, and reports to be actively pursuing the transition of PS to e-book formats on good quality, high resolution color screens in the near future. (And hopefully, he's seen the Mag+ from Bonnier, for some good ideas on how to organize his content.) Here's hoping that the proper combination of these desires, ideas and elements will result in a reader and e-book package of all magazine content that will mean I can move all my subscriptions to e-book packages and a good reading device, and stop filling my house with reams of paper every month. Last edited by Steven Lyle Jordan; 01-21-2010 at 09:40 AM. |
|
01-21-2010, 11:52 AM | #2 | |
Groupie
Posts: 181
Karma: 478
Join Date: Oct 2009
Device: Android & FBReader
|
Quote:
If something like this came on the market tomorrow even as high as ~$1000 I'd but it in a minute - provided it supported the ebooks I already own too. |
|
Advert | |
|
01-21-2010, 11:56 AM | #3 |
Wizard
Posts: 2,806
Karma: 13500000
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Device: Boox PB360 etc etc etc
|
Kinda Ridiculous if you ask me. They should have a digital version that is available now for subscribing to so when the color readers come they will already have a base of customers that can show it about.
I've read several old editions from Google Books http://books.google.com/books?cd=3&q...G=Search+Books and thoroughly enjoyed them even in black and white. I'm sure he's seen the bonnier one and hopefully the SI/Time Inc one as well http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ntyXvLnxyXk Last edited by Dulin's Books; 01-21-2010 at 12:01 PM. |
01-21-2010, 12:10 PM | #4 |
Wizard
Posts: 1,234
Karma: 3350652
Join Date: Feb 2008
Device: Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (300ppi), Samsung Galaxy Book 12
|
The thing which I'm not seeing addressed is the matter of bandwidth.
A 4-colour glossy magazine of some 10s of pages represents _gigabytes_ of data --- and one can just grab it off a newsstand and flip through it instantly --- I'm currently waiting some 10s of minutes just to copy a couple of gigabytes of graphics from a DVD-R to a server (over 1000BT). Once upon a time I subscribed to a couple of .pdf magazines at www.qmags.com and it was always striking how much the resolution of images was reduced and how long it still took to d/l the files. Now one has things like Olive magazine (a flash based interface) and one has to d/l a page at a time and flipping from one end to the other of the file takes rather a while. Even if one does lower the resolution to what's possible on a screen, people will still want to be able to zoom in --- so the device has to have a connection to d/l the higher resolution / zoomed image. When is the next breakthrough in bandwidth going to happen? Until then, what sort of compromises are going to be necessary and how will this affect battery life and interfaces? William (who carries a loupe in his laptop bag for examining the details in printed works from time-to-time) |
01-21-2010, 04:06 PM | #5 | ||
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 8,478
Karma: 5171130
Join Date: Jan 2006
Device: none
|
Quote:
But are digital mag producers thinking of serving content live, or allowing you to download it and read whenever/wherever you are? I think there's some of both thoughts out there. Bandwidth may not be such an issue if the mag is stored locally on your device, as opposed to streaming it from an online source... I'd rather have the files locally anyway, and have the option of saving or keeping parts as I desire (I have described the idea of a "digital scrapbook before) and either deleting or archiving the rest. Quote:
Edit: Silly me... I thought PopSci was still owned by Time Warner... but they are now owned by (wait for it...) the Bonnier Corporation! So I guess it's safe to say they are aware of the Mag+ video. Of course, that was a concept piece, not a working device... Last edited by Steven Lyle Jordan; 01-21-2010 at 04:21 PM. |
||
Advert | |
|
01-21-2010, 04:31 PM | #6 | |
Maratus speciosus butt
Posts: 3,292
Karma: 1162698
Join Date: Sep 2009
Device: PRS-350
|
Quote:
Take a look at some of the free "light" versions of back issues of these: http://www.3dcreativemag.com/ http://www.2dartistmag.com/ Small files. Look good. If you are on a modem, then yeah, a few dozen megabytes for a magazine issue might actually mean something to you. But at even mediocre broadband would be in no way stressed by it. With my mediocre by world standards 10 megabits per seconds, downloading a few dozen megabytes is almost quicker than typing the words "a few dozen megabytes." I sometimes download 700MB divx files of moves I already own on DVD because doing so is actually quicker and less hassle than searching through my unorganized shelves. A few dozen to a few hundred megabytes is nothing. (Of course how they would look on a small device and how much space they would take up on it are entirely different issues.) http://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/I...speedchart.jpg |
|
Tags |
e-book reader, future devices, popular science |
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Good Popular Science Books? | bonaldo2000 | Reading Recommendations | 8 | 12-22-2011 07:27 AM |
Popular Science | mhuntoon | Calibre | 2 | 03-08-2010 12:23 PM |
Popular Science and Calibre | rcuadro | Calibre | 1 | 10-26-2009 10:57 AM |
DIY KINDLE INSTRUCTIONS FROM POPULAR SCIENCE | jankovicgood | News | 12 | 10-16-2009 04:11 AM |
E-book readers mentioned... positively, no less... in Jan 09 Popular Science | Steven Lyle Jordan | News | 2 | 12-26-2008 06:54 AM |