|
View Poll Results: Should browsing on an unsecured wireless network become legal? | |||
Yes, it should become legal | 26 | 59.09% | |
I have no opinion | 6 | 13.64% | |
No,browsing on unsecured wireless networks is and should remain illegal | 12 | 27.27% | |
Voters: 44. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
11-17-2008, 07:55 PM | #31 |
Punctuation Fetishist
Posts: 557
Karma: 1070000
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Bluest Commonwealth In East America
Device: Kindle PW, Nexus 7 (2013), Galaxy S5 phone, Galaxy Tab 4 8.0
|
I just set up a wifi router. It never occurred to me that anyone would deliberately leave one unsecured. I figured they just had trouble doing it and gave up, or didn't know you could secure one. The things you learn.
Regards, Jack Tingle |
11-18-2008, 09:48 AM | #32 |
Beepbeep n beebeep, yeah!
Posts: 11,726
Karma: 8255450
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: La Crosse, Wisconsin, aka America's IceBox
Device: iThingie, KmkII, I miss Zelda!
|
I have no idea how to secure a router, but I think it may explain why my connections keep getting fropped. How do I do this thing?
|
11-18-2008, 10:45 AM | #33 | |
Enjoying the show....
Posts: 14,270
Karma: 10462841
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Arizona
Device: A K1, Kindle Paperwhite, an Ipod, IPad2, Iphone, an Ipad Mini & macAir
|
Quote:
I secured mine, not because I don't want to share bandwidth, but because I was told it would be easy for a hacker to steal data. Obviously, not just anyone could do there, but there are people out there who do. Last edited by desertgrandma; 11-18-2008 at 10:45 AM. Reason: sp. |
|
11-18-2008, 10:46 AM | #34 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 8,478
Karma: 5171130
Join Date: Jan 2006
Device: none
|
When it comes to electronics, the majority of people just want to plug it in and see it work... and if it does, they're done. Since most wifi routers come set to default unsecured settings, that's what most people set up.
It isn't until they are advised to secure their network to protect their service, or after a nearby user maxes out their bandwidth, that many people will secure their network... and I suspect many of them have their ISP do the work or talk them through it, so they don't know too well how it works. Pshrynk, what you have to do in a nutshell is to input a reasonably secure password for your wifi router, and set up your computers to use that password when accessing the net through the router. The details, however, depend on your service and equipment, so I cannot give you much more than that. If your ISP provided the equipment, they can help... and the router's instruction book should also be able to talk you through it. Most Geek Squad-type services will be able to help you with that, too. |
11-18-2008, 10:49 AM | #35 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 8,478
Karma: 5171130
Join Date: Jan 2006
Device: none
|
That is the other big deal about unsecured WiFi... who wants to risk someone else outside accessing your PC and downloading, say, your Quicken database, a client list, or personal e-mails? Even if you don't care about people accessing the web, you're better off securing your connection for your own safety. (I'd bet this is the reason why most people secure their WiFi.)
|
11-18-2008, 11:33 AM | #36 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,452
Karma: 7185064
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Linköpng, Sweden
Device: Kindle Voyage, Nexus 5, Kindle PW
|
Quote:
Regarding securing a router. Nowadays you usually just point your browser to the router (see the manual) and configure it there. It is usually not very hard. Usually you have to connect a computer with a cable to be able to configure the router. You cannot do it using the WiFi. |
|
11-18-2008, 12:27 PM | #37 | |
Wizard
Posts: 1,018
Karma: 67827
Join Date: Jan 2005
Device: PocketBook Era
|
Quote:
Bruce Schneier has a nice article on this topic. In a nutshell: if you have a "secure" wireless network, the bad guys can still break in - so it's not secure. If your network is open, you can deny that you had anything do to with the bad guys using your open network. It's harder to deny that when your network is "secure" - especially when you are in a court filled with non-technical people. |
|
11-18-2008, 01:01 PM | #38 | |
Enjoying the show....
Posts: 14,270
Karma: 10462841
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Arizona
Device: A K1, Kindle Paperwhite, an Ipod, IPad2, Iphone, an Ipad Mini & macAir
|
Quote:
However, isn't it only prudent to take what precautions you can, and stay alert? I'd feel really stupid if someone hacked my bank account because I didn't secure my connection. Or robbed my house because I left the door unlocked. BUT if I took the proper steps, and they did it anyway, I could shoot them with a clear conscience...... |
|
11-18-2008, 01:14 PM | #39 |
Gizmologist
Posts: 11,615
Karma: 929550
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Republic of Texas Embassy at Jackson, TN
Device: Pocketbook Touch HD3
|
|
11-18-2008, 01:40 PM | #40 | |
Wizard
Posts: 1,018
Karma: 67827
Join Date: Jan 2005
Device: PocketBook Era
|
Quote:
You return home to be put in jail for child porn. If your network was open, you could claim you knew nothing about it. If your network is "secure", it's harder to make that claim. |
|
11-18-2008, 01:51 PM | #41 | |
Enjoying the show....
Posts: 14,270
Karma: 10462841
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Arizona
Device: A K1, Kindle Paperwhite, an Ipod, IPad2, Iphone, an Ipad Mini & macAir
|
Quote:
I guess this could happen.......but Okaaaay........but wouldn't this hacker be looking for a unsecured network first? That would be way easier than hacking a secure network. And realize I am less than knowledgeable about how all this works, but couldn't this 'child porn server' be traced back to its original source? |
|
11-18-2008, 01:53 PM | #42 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 8,478
Karma: 5171130
Join Date: Jan 2006
Device: none
|
Quote:
But if your network was secured, you could claim that you did what you could to restrict such access, to a reasonable degree. You would probably not be held liable unless it could be demonstrated that you intentionally made the access code available to others, or failed to protect it adequately. If you left it open, you could easily be held liable due to negligence (where ignorance is considered no excuse). |
|
11-18-2008, 01:56 PM | #43 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 8,478
Karma: 5171130
Join Date: Jan 2006
Device: none
|
Quote:
And a "child porn server" may not be accessible... for instance, if it resides in another country wherein its owners cannot be prosecuted or extradited. |
|
11-18-2008, 03:32 PM | #44 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 8,501
Karma: 64095689
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Harrisburg outskirts
Device: Palms, K1-4s, iPads, iPhones, KV, KO1
|
I've had some probs getting WEP to work, since I had mixed computer flavors in the house (mac/pc). I opted for "allow in only these specified machine numbers" protection. Is there any reason this is a bad idea?
|
11-18-2008, 03:39 PM | #45 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 8,478
Karma: 5171130
Join Date: Jan 2006
Device: none
|
I've heard it's a perfectly good idea. Although a MAC number can (I believe) be spoofed by another machine, trying to guess that number is almost as difficult as working out a good encrypted password.
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Unsecured Text | thymaster | Sony Reader | 4 | 09-10-2010 04:01 PM |
Windows CE 95%+ English for SmartQ, wireless network working | Houndx | Alternative Devices | 24 | 01-14-2010 09:15 AM |
can't connect to wireless network | RibRdb2 | iRex | 9 | 12-11-2007 09:40 PM |
Verizon to Open Their Wireless Network | RWood | Alternative Devices | 1 | 12-07-2007 11:41 PM |
User Friendly Wireless Network Management | alanine | iRex | 7 | 10-22-2007 09:06 AM |