03-04-2012, 05:21 AM | #46 | ||||
Wizard
Posts: 4,896
Karma: 33602910
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: PocketBook 903 & 360+
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
This is what the publishers want the libraries to do. Giving in like this would just make publishers increase the prices of ebooks until it's impossible for the libraries to justify buying them. |
||||
03-04-2012, 07:48 AM | #47 | |
Guru
Posts: 643
Karma: 551634
Join Date: Dec 2007
Device: Kindle 1.0.8, iPod Touch, Kindle Keyboard
|
Quote:
|
|
Advert | |
|
03-04-2012, 07:54 AM | #48 |
Guru
Posts: 643
Karma: 551634
Join Date: Dec 2007
Device: Kindle 1.0.8, iPod Touch, Kindle Keyboard
|
And also I would suggest that the market is not setting the price of library e-books until we have lots of publishers, all competing with each other to sell similar products, and libraries can pick and choose freely among them.
When a five-publisher coalition controls a lot of the market, the market isn't free. At which point taking action to offset that doesn't seems reasonable to me. |
03-04-2012, 04:17 PM | #49 |
Wizard
Posts: 4,812
Karma: 26912940
Join Date: Apr 2010
Device: sony PRS-T1 and T3, Kobo Mini and Aura HD, Tablet
|
Random House noted that e-books can be "repeatedly circulated without limitation,"
|
03-04-2012, 05:02 PM | #50 |
monkey on the fringe
Posts: 45,477
Karma: 158151390
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Seattle Metro
Device: Moto E6, Echo Show
|
|
Advert | |
|
03-04-2012, 05:33 PM | #51 | |
Enthusiast
Posts: 41
Karma: 483410
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: New England
Device: Aura H2O; N7 2013; Samsung GN 10.1 2014
|
Quote:
Any day that I have visited my library, I've found several people there who appear to be studying for school, or using the public computers to job search or update their resumes. My library hosts weekly movie & game nights (card games, console games, etc.) for teens. Heaven forbid they use "entertainment" to give kids a safe place to go and get them in the door of the library where they might pick up a book while they are there and become interested in reading as a hobby. To get back on topic, I keep seeing publishers say that once a library has an e-book, if they don't put a lending limit, then the library never needs to replace the book as they would a physical copy that would wear out. In this case, Random House is saying, ok, no limit, but you're going to pay a higher cost up front since you will never have to replace a physical copy that would wear out. Two problems with this - First, I've seen ages old books at my library that are in perfectly fine shape, that have not been repurchased and replaced in a number of years. So I feel that argument is kind of out the window. Second, *format changes*. As with all types of media, there is the possibility that the format will change and digital copies will need to be repurchased at some point. However, I suppose that we shouldn't expect a company that still calls it's audio book selection "Books on Tape" to consider a thing such as format changes. |
|
03-04-2012, 08:21 PM | #52 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,034
Karma: 39379388
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: near Philadelphia USA
Device: Kindle Kids Edition, Fire HD 10 (11th generation)
|
Quote:
Libraries, at least in the US, are in the early stages of what seems to me a major, even existential, challenge. Whether it is seen as crucial for fulfilling their core mission, or just crucial to maintain public support, libraries need to provide access to recent best-sellers. And as the world moves to eBooks, it puts publishers in a position where they can take advantage of this by singling out libraries for high prices on the books they want the most. Print journal publishers have been doing this for a long time -- charging high prices to libraries and lower prices to individuals. Now, for the first time, the trade book industry can do the same. At the same time publishers are starting to single out libraries for extra high prices, Amazon is directly competing with public libraries through its Amazon Lending Library. This could take away the middle and upper class constituencies for libraries, and I'm not sure they can really survive if primarily seen as poverty programs. Someone please correct me, but I am thinking just the opposite. Wouldn't any attempt to regulate the prices multi-national publishers charge US-based governmental libraries go against international laws enforced by the World Trade Organization? Even if I am wrong there, forcing publishers to charge every class of customer the same price is politically impossible in almost all countries, and certainly in a center-right country like the US. Question to any librarians on the thread: To what extent do public libraries based acquisition prioritization on the price of the book? |
|
03-04-2012, 08:45 PM | #53 |
Guru
Posts: 944
Karma: 1490348
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Norman, OK
Device: Sony PRS 350, 900, 950; Kindles (ALL of them!); Kobo Aura One
|
In Italy, the government regulates ebook prices.
The result is that we have virtually no ebooks. Price controls invariably restrict supply. You don't want to buy it? Don't. Your library doesn't want to buy it? It shouldn't. I want to retain the freedom to decide for myself. |
03-05-2012, 06:46 AM | #54 | |
Guru
Posts: 861
Karma: 3543721
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Estonia
Device: Kindle Paperwhite, iPad 3, Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
|
Quote:
Anyway, in theory, I think publishers charging libraries a bit more for a copy does make sense. It would probably serve everyone's interests (well, everyone but the publisher anyway) better if it was some kind of fixed price increase, though (e.g. twice the full retail price or something similar). There definitely is the argument of "an ebook file isn't going to wear out or get lost", so there is never going to be a practical reason for the library to repurchase it. On the other hand, the majority of physical books in libraries probably never get so worn out that they need replacing, either (especially as books can get repaired), so setting the ebook price equivalent to having to buy 1 original copy and 1 replacement would, to me, seem reasonably fair. A checkout cap would be another method, but the 26 checkout limit by HarperCollins sounds far too low - I can't imagine most books wearing out so much that they need to be replaced in just one year (if it's a popular book that's lent out to a new reader every two weeks). Something like a 100 checkout cap would probably be more reasonable, but I'm not a librarian and don't really know how many loans a typical well-bound book can take before needing to be replaced (or repaired for more money than buying a new copy would cost). |
|
03-05-2012, 08:25 AM | #55 | |
Wizard
Posts: 4,896
Karma: 33602910
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: PocketBook 903 & 360+
|
Quote:
|
|
03-05-2012, 08:44 AM | #56 |
monkey on the fringe
Posts: 45,477
Karma: 158151390
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Seattle Metro
Device: Moto E6, Echo Show
|
|
03-05-2012, 08:55 AM | #57 |
Wizard
Posts: 1,594
Karma: 21245891
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Canada
Device: Kobo Libra h20, Paperwhite 2017, Phone & Tablet w Moonreader
|
Another reason why despite me loving my e-reader and loving the things that are available to me, I will never leave my first love of the dead-tree kind.
Real physical books last longer than greedy publishers pretend they do, and e-books are not worth more than tree books. If libraries stopped carrying e-books because publishers want a zillion dollars for a silly little file containing a couple hundred pages, then so be it. I still have other things to read and other formats to read them legally and for free. I also would rather support authors instead of greedy publishers. |
03-05-2012, 09:32 AM | #58 |
Wizard
Posts: 4,896
Karma: 33602910
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: PocketBook 903 & 360+
|
|
03-05-2012, 09:50 AM | #59 |
Chasing Butterflies
Posts: 3,132
Karma: 5074169
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: American Southwest
Device: Uses batteries.
|
Precisely, and it's not easy to clarify to the public why certain books aren't available.
I absolutely favor government intervention to keep prices set the same regardless of the customer. Random House can't charge me 300% of what they charge everyone else; why should libraries be any different? |
03-05-2012, 11:59 AM | #60 | |
Addict
Posts: 271
Karma: 2000000
Join Date: Jan 2009
Device: Sony PRS-505
|
Quote:
Certainly at some point price gouging needs the attention of the government, but where that line is is debatable. It certainly seems like there's been a lot of gouging going on lately. The American consumer has really gotten the short end of the stick the last twenty five years or so. Crappier products, higher prices, less service and proprietary lock-outs. You get less for more now and that needs to change somehow. Certainly government needs to return to enforcing anti-collusion laws. There appears (though I haven't looked in to it know for sure) that there is a lot of collusion going on with price fixing in various industries. This situation is a case in point. Who wants to bet other publishers will follow Random House's move despite the fact that offering cheaper prices gives them a decided advantage over their rival? Last edited by MV64; 03-05-2012 at 12:02 PM. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Random House comments on Amazon Pricing | Daithi | News | 82 | 05-17-2011 05:53 PM |
Ex-CEO of Random House on ebook pricing and the future of publishing | garygibsonsf | News | 93 | 05-03-2011 08:27 AM |
Random House adopts agency pricing March 1st | Fbone | News | 173 | 03-06-2011 11:25 AM |
iBookstore pricing revealed | Elfwreck | Apple Devices | 5 | 03-29-2010 06:13 PM |
Increase in Sony Connect Library? | DougFNJ | Sony Reader | 21 | 04-07-2007 12:40 PM |