03-02-2011, 12:01 PM | #31 | |
Guru
Posts: 826
Karma: 6566849
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Bay Area
Device: kindle keyboard, kindle fire hd, S4, Nook hd+
|
Quote:
I think the lightness of his touch, or the delicateness, is Forster's strength and weakness. Unlike most nineteenth century writers, like Dostoevsky, Dickens, and Balzac, Forster doesn't slam his themes into the readers head. Nineteenth century writers (except for maybe the realists) were unmistakable in what they were trying to convey. They'd tie you up, throw you to the ground, and force feed you their themes. Forster doesn't hold the readers hand or drag him along. Forster's delicacy can be weakness, though, because it makes it easy to miss important details, to gloss over the book and see nothing. That's why I think so many readers feel empty after reading this novel. Still, I think if the reader manages to pay attention he can absorb the themes and by the end the themes become apparent in some way. Like with the characters, the revelation lingers and ebbs at the outer edges of the reader's consciousness, until the moment the reader is ready for a breakthrough. I suggest to readers who didn't get this novel the first time to give it a second shot, this time with the big picture in mind. You'll see things that were hiding behind the characters and events before, all the little hidden actors and forces will come to the fore, and you'll find that this book is worthy of its classic status. Forster still, however, exhibits characteristics of the Victorian writer. His style and methods are in a transitionary state between Victorianism and Modernism. His narrator still tends to elaborate a bit much, still explicates themes or summarizes characters too tidily. He hasn't quite achieved the "scrupulous meanness" described by Joyce. For me it created an odd feeling of reading something that is modern yet not-quite-so modern. For other readers this state of flux may be alienating. Last edited by spellbanisher; 03-02-2011 at 12:37 PM. |
|
03-02-2011, 12:26 PM | #32 |
Guru
Posts: 826
Karma: 6566849
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Bay Area
Device: kindle keyboard, kindle fire hd, S4, Nook hd+
|
To elaborate on the last paragraph in my previous post, I think many readers interpret Edwardian fiction as fluffy and pointless. Modernism can be so ungenerous in what it gives to the reader that you just know and assume that there is something going on beneath the surface. Just think of Hemingway's iceberg theory. With Victorianism the themes are explicit and unmistakable. Edwardian fiction is not quite either. If you come into the work expecting nothing to be handed to you, like you would with a modernist work, you'll find that the narrator does give you something, and therefore conclude that the work is premodern. But when you try to read it as Victorian fiction you find that the narrator doesn't have nearly as much to say as Victorian narrators, and therefore conclude that the book itself has little to say.
|
03-02-2011, 01:13 PM | #33 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 5,161
Karma: 81026524
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Italy
Device: Kindle3, Ipod4, IPad2
|
I'm going to have to find that lecture.
that is not a problem. I mentioned it in a hurry, but now I can give it to you: Aspects of the Novel RosettaBooks ISB 0795309503 Spoiler:
Wait. Let me add a big smile Last edited by beppe; 03-02-2011 at 01:15 PM. |
03-04-2011, 01:20 PM | #34 |
¿Huh?
Posts: 349
Karma: 1004526
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: rural Jalisco
Device: HiSense A7 CC, Fire HD6, Kobo Libra2
|
I can't say I really liked any of the characters much (Mr. Emerson excepted). They were all pretty one dimensional—hard to identify with.
Usually it would have been hard to keep going, but I was completely drawn in and on with the writing. I kept trying to figure out why, what was about Forster's writing that was so exceptional? I am seldom actually aware of the specific literary merits (it that's the right terminology) of a book, even one I really like but I was completely captivated with this one. I read this in January and in truth cannot recall much of the plot, but I do recall the pleasure derived in the reading simply due to the talents of the author. I have added Forster's Aspects of the Novel to my soon-to-read list. I anticipate really liking it as I prefer nonfiction to fiction. d |
03-05-2011, 01:23 PM | #35 |
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Karma: 10
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Device: Toshiba Mini with Nook PC App
|
A big THANK YOU to this reading group! I had previously been unaware of this author. Making liberal use of dictionary.com and Wikipedia, I have enjoyed my Italian holiday. Now I can't wait to see what happens in England.
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MobileRead Discussion: The Machine Stops by E. M. Forster (spoilers) | pilotbob | Book Clubs | 66 | 04-02-2014 03:19 PM |
Romance Forster, E.M.: A Room With A View. v1.1 2007-06-30 | BenG | BBeB/LRF Books (offline) | 3 | 07-27-2011 06:42 AM |
Other Fiction Forster, E.M.: A Room With a View V 1.0, 05 April 2010 | weatherwax | ePub Books (offline) | 2 | 02-01-2011 06:06 AM |
Book review: E. M. Forster, A Room with a View | Puffball | Reading Recommendations | 2 | 02-26-2008 03:42 PM |
Forster, E.M.: A Room with a View | MicheleC | Kindle Books (offline) | 0 | 12-22-2007 11:22 AM |