08-05-2010, 11:44 AM | #31 |
Chocolate Grasshopper ...
Posts: 27,599
Karma: 20821184
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Scotland
Device: Muse HD , Cybook Gen3 , Pocketbook 302 (Black) , Nexus 10: wife has PW
|
Have a wee tot of the good stuff to calm your nerves .... !
|
08-05-2010, 11:59 AM | #32 | |
temp. out of service
Posts: 2,794
Karma: 24285242
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Duisburg (DE)
Device: PB 623
|
Quote:
the RPG tech term for a slushpile candidate rulebook is (since they re mostly "it's a lot like D&D, but") "fantasy-heartbreaker". Things written by people who are bot content, with specific aspects of the ruleset in their fav. games and think they can do it better. Unfortunately in most cases they cannot. Since RPG is really a small niche in writing as such, the outcomes are very often publicly shown to the community during (a good development decision) or after creation, since most of them 'll end up indie (the most producers already HAVE main lines of a specific topics, so getting commercially published by an established company is not really probable.) So there is somethimg what could be called "public acceptancy-driven slushpile" Because of its nature i.e. usually containing gamesystem rules (referred to as crunch) as well as world/culture descriptions (fluff) a roleplaying corebook could be seen as a genere mix of a tech manual combined with an F/SF book They just apply some changes wirh glue rewrite some pieces/rules without being aware of how far some (can) changes go (what do you mean with game theory/probability of dice-rolls?) A lot of these people go indy since even if you are successfull, you'll never make a living from RPG (as even pros admit) Some of them offer really good stuff where "good" means "well made and playable" w/o even touching the aspect how many players d' be interested in playing such a setup. the bad examples are as taken out from an "Idol"-episode and given them dice and a keyboard to type. It isn't about typos and things proofreading and peer-review copyedit couldn't repair (altough i even experienced pointing somebody to lexical errors being thanked with "so what" Writing inconsistent settings; illogical and/or mathematically screwed rules, these people actively block:
my fav still is a rule (here math converted to explanation): when both a pro and a layman bear the same injure making the task in question harder to fulfill the layman does better because he's more used to encounter obstacles, whereas the pro is "spoiled" by his routine. now imagine (yeah picture them in your mind) a pro freeclimber vs. J. Average both with wounded shoulder hanging on a damn high piece of rock. (the guy who wrote that sells the rules POD via Lulu) I'm every day tempted to place a 1-line review on Amazon saying: Please don't judge indie RPG's by this here as example" Similarly to that, things become funny when said RPGeniuses feel some ingame used skills need more elaboration, withtout ever wasting time on the slightest research about that skill in reality. I'm not speaking about achieving 100% realism in a RPG - this is IMPOSSSIBLE. but I think a gamedesigner needs at least some basic info from which can be decided what and how to simplify the data to fit in the ruleset. In comparison to that introducing /magic/kewlpowers/psi/whatever to the setting without further thinking how far and in which way it would change ALL normal life is a forgivable flaw. (that's what JKR actually did in Potter, but Eddings (all materials); LeGuin (Earthsea); and Canavan (guild saga) masterfully avoided. (and about what Heinleins SiASW is a the best long example followed by Asimovs robotics short stories). There are some gems in the pile. Some of them unpublished, but given avay for free only because the creators know the hassle with it could cost more than it pays back. as an example for (with a special pointout for a great work on the bestiary) see "Legendary Quest" But there is a such big amount of awul stuff in gaming that I'm really more than willing to believe that the crapometer in an average slushpile is in very high 9x% values. More unfortunately, the niche is so small, that a such extensive level of editing and copy-editing, as common in book producing* is luxurious in RPG. *)exceptions left away, you wouldn't want to take a look on 4 specific passages of the (new/original german edition of Heinleins SiASW I have here. |
|
Advert | |
|
08-05-2010, 12:54 PM | #33 | |
Addict
Posts: 270
Karma: 1041222
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: UK
Device: Kindle
|
Quote:
There's not much call for autobiographical stuff, even if it does feature a story about crapping your pants in public. |
|
08-05-2010, 01:35 PM | #34 |
Guru
Posts: 687
Karma: 5700000
Join Date: Dec 2009
Device: kindle
|
|
08-05-2010, 07:10 PM | #35 | |||
Sci-Fi Author
Posts: 1,157
Karma: 14743509
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Michigan
Device: PC (Calibre)
|
Quote:
Quote:
I think the biggest problem that comes to this industry as well is all the idiotic famous people who whip out some steaming pile of poo and sell millions of copies. Uh, duh. They sell millions because they're famous, not because they can write. My gawds, I've read some of the books penned by famous people, and while a few of them were good, most were the kind that nearly make your head implode. >.< And the only way we're going to stop nonsense like this is to get it through people's heads that they better have a knock out awesome novel, or don't even bother. And not awesome by their standards, but by a panel of at least 10 critics. That's part of what helped me become so good at tech writing. You can't even imagine how many other writers I studied in the beginning in order to get good, and how many Hiroshima level roastings I went through in the process of improving myself. It wasn't until I started getting "Meh, it's ok" responses that I knew I'd finally reached the level of "acceptable". After that it was merely climbing the other half of the mountain to reach the peak. However, most people won't even step out of the house and walk across the valley to get to the mountain, let alone climb it. And yet they want to have that mountain peak success with valley floor experience and skills, to use a mountain metaphor. And again, it may sound like I'm trying to discourage new writers. I'm not. I'm merely trying to get them to realize that success in writing is not push button. You don't just point, click, and suddenly become the next Stephen King. It's years of writing, hard work, and struggle. Heck, it took me 15 years to get to the level I am now, and I figure it'll be another 15 before I can even dream of writing on the same level as the great masters of the pen. So they either need to be willing to struggle and grow, or else they need to give up on ever being published, or writing for that matter. And I don't mean to harp on the subject, but it frustrates me to no end just as much as I'm sure it frustrates the many editors and publishers here too, not to mention all the good writers who get blocked by all the slush file chaff. Quote:
|
|||
Advert | |
|
08-05-2010, 09:12 PM | #36 |
Guru
Posts: 687
Karma: 5700000
Join Date: Dec 2009
Device: kindle
|
That's not quite the moral I took away from that (fantastic) movie. But I suppose it's true nonetheless.
|
08-06-2010, 03:31 PM | #37 |
Sci-Fi Author
Posts: 1,157
Karma: 14743509
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Michigan
Device: PC (Calibre)
|
Well, the way I saw it, you had two people in the movie who were primary characters: The rat and Linguini. The rat could cook with the best of them. Linguini couldn't. Yes, he could "cook", taking literally the proper definition of "preparing food", but that didn't mean you would eat it, or possible end up keeping it down rather than depositing it in the nearest porcelain thrown. So thin of it like this. The kitchen full of chefs was the 2% of great writers who are picked out of the slush piles of publishing houses. The rat was the magical individual from among that group who produces the next great classic/blockbuster. Linguini represented the worst of the other 98%. Anywho, that's what I took from it, and how I drew up the comparison.
|
08-06-2010, 05:21 PM | #38 | ||
Guru
Posts: 687
Karma: 5700000
Join Date: Dec 2009
Device: kindle
|
Quote:
Even the ghost of linguini's dad told the rat not to scoff at the kid, repeating the everyone can cook line. I thought it was a strange movie to reference as supporting your point, because I think the real meat of that story would probably translate to this thread with the axiom that everyone can write well, not withstanding slush pile evidence to contrary. Just because what the 98-99% put down is actually drivel doesn't mean the authors of that drivel didn't have the capacity to write, just that they didn't exercise it. Ratatouille was such fantastic narrative (my favorite of Pixar's many diamonds), and (IMO) the everyone can cook line wasn't incidental to it or disproven within its own story. In the end, what broke the hard-nosed critic -- who would have similar opinions of the very nature of the 98% -- was cooking that called to memory a meal made not by one of the greats, but by another 'everyone': his mom. That the cook who reminded him of that was a rat was almost (almost) beside the point. Quote:
I think he would say, in fact, everyone can (has the capacity to) cook well; it's not beyond their ability, some just need a little help. That doesn't mean everyone would have their own 5 star restaurant, only that they could excel in the art and use cooking where they are to brighten the life they have (the rat's life was enriched by it long before he got to the restaurant). Translated to this thread, while the masses couldn't compete with Clancy, they have their own story to tell, and if content to tell that without the accolades and wealth of mass market success and were willing to patiently learn and utilize the tools of storytelling, they could in fact be great writers and write well. Not that writing is natural to all, but that both story telling and the skills needed to do it are well within the grasp of even the commoner. Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go contemplate the extent of the meaninglessness of my own life that would drive me to make such a thorough exposition of the credo of a computer animated cooking rat and his otherworldly mentor. |
||
08-07-2010, 09:46 PM | #39 |
Addict
Posts: 363
Karma: 500001
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Georgia, USA
Device: Kindle2
|
The number of publishable manuscripts is greater than the number actually published. I would guess that agented manuscripts have a higher percentage of publishable vs. non, but if you're talking about the slush pile, I've heard from two editors at a Big Name publishing house that around 10% of those are of publishable quality.
|
08-07-2010, 10:38 PM | #40 | |
Addict
Posts: 197
Karma: 1010202
Join Date: Mar 2010
Device: iPod Touch
|
Quote:
However, I've also been a writing teacher, and I read the stuff that never even made it to the slush pile. Most of the really bad literature in the world is never completed. I don't know that any of my students ever actually made it to the submission stage, but I think the biggest block was fear of rejection. It's possible some of those would self-publish because there is no overt rejection. I don't know if what we see at Smashwords and on Kindle yet represent the slush pile. I think there are groups who are jumping ahead of the rest. Midlist writers with a backlist. Writers who have been in the "almost" pile for a little too long and realize that they just aren't marketable to a big publisher. The people who hate rejection and maybe never submitted. And the fringe who never thought of doing anything else. So what we've got is a disproportionate number of the worst and the good but not commercial. And non-commercial works will likely be loved by a niche audience, and not by the rest of us. You're not going to see best seller types in the indie ranks yet. And you may never see it, because they sell at Walmart, and Walmart doesn't buy indies. So yes, I think most of us will find two percent or less of books that meet our standards, but I don't think that fully reflects the quality out there now. And yes, I think we'll see more junk, AND more good stuff coming this way. It doesn't matter what the proportion is, though, because I think we have the tools to sort through it. We've done it with the web for years. And Amazon's tools have been well honed to help us find what we want out of the hundreds of thousands of things we don't. Camille |
|
08-08-2010, 11:09 AM | #41 | |
Zealot
Posts: 129
Karma: 11430
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NC, USA
Device: my laptop
|
Quote:
--Maria |
|
08-10-2010, 04:11 AM | #42 |
Feral Underclass
Posts: 3,622
Karma: 26821535
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Yorkshire, tha noz
Device: 2nd hand paperback
|
I liken the internet to the point in the late 70s when bands realised they could just record and release their own single and not have to bother sending demo tapes out to record publishers. It meant that a lot of music that would otherwise never have been heard got to find its own market. A lot of it was pretty rough around the edges (one record I have apologises for the buzzing sounds caused by someone opening a fridge door during the recording*), but it was better that than never hearing them at all.
* I was quite annoyed when I bought the CD reissue and found out it had been removed. It just sounded odd without them. |
08-10-2010, 06:37 AM | #43 | |
Groupie
Posts: 172
Karma: 200001
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: London
Device: Kindle keyboard
|
Quote:
But I don't think 'not marketable to a big publisher' is the same as 'not commercial'. Agents are trying to second-guess the taste of publishers, and publishers don't always get it right. There have been bidding wars for books that sold disappointingly, and surprise best-sellers. And everyone in the publishing industry is getting more cautious and fearful of making a misjudgement. Thank goodness for the option of self-publishing. |
|
08-10-2010, 07:55 AM | #44 |
Sci-Fi Author
Posts: 1,157
Karma: 14743509
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Michigan
Device: PC (Calibre)
|
I love the way you put that, and I partially blame the "profit focused" business model for that, of which I in turn blame shareholders for perpetuating. When pure, unadulterated, maximized profits are your only goal, risk ceases to be anything you're willing to undertake. As a result, a lot of really great things die, having been sacrificed on the alter of corporate greed.
|
08-10-2010, 08:36 AM | #45 | |
Groupie
Posts: 172
Karma: 200001
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: London
Device: Kindle keyboard
|
Quote:
Interesting times for writers. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Print from Sigil? Or viable alternative? | Hitch | Sigil | 31 | 07-13-2010 04:31 PM |
I want my manuscripts to be read on mobilephones and PC. How? | seasong | General Discussions | 10 | 05-14-2010 11:09 AM |
Buy Once, Read Many-A viable solution to the format mess? | jasonkchapman | News | 5 | 10-30-2009 05:17 PM |
Iliad Book Edition: a viable word processor? | lotusindigo | iRex | 12 | 08-10-2009 10:32 PM |
Madame Bovary original manuscripts available online | zelda_pinwheel | News | 9 | 04-25-2009 08:46 PM |