|02-18-2010, 05:24 PM||#16|
Join Date: May 2007
Device: iRex iLiad, DR800SG
Of course, not matter how fuzzy you try to make it there's still wiggle room, so you get a second law (DMCA) written which makes it impossible for consumers to even attempt fair use.
|02-18-2010, 05:26 PM||#17|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SF Bay Area, California, USA
Device: Clié; PRS-505; EZR Pocket Pro, PRS-600, Kobo Mini
I think that, had they realized that at some point, more than 50% of all business communications would directly connect to copyright law ('cos hey! Just by reading this, you're making more than a dozen copies of it on various servers!), they'd've defined "fair use" a bit more precisely.
In the proposed changes, "non-consumptive copies" should include "makes copies on various servers in order to get it to readers."
|02-19-2010, 05:17 AM||#18|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Device: PRS-600 Silver. Much nicer than I expected.
With all this talk about RAM, and such, have their been serious legal cases based around the transmission of copyrighted material on servers, in RAM, etc.? It seems that something similar was always an issue, for radio transmissions of music, etc. Is this an issue of serious concern these days?
|copyright, cra, fair use|
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Canadian Copyright Law||Ralph Sir Edward||Upload Help||4||10-05-2012 04:59 PM|
|Secret Copyright Law Reported||6charlong||News||339||01-20-2010 07:54 PM|
|French Copyright Law Question||ahi||News||8||01-14-2010 03:25 PM|
|Current US copyright law||Ralph Sir Edward||Upload Help||2||08-19-2009 07:48 PM|
|getting around copyright law||sic||Workshop||2||12-08-2006 03:56 PM|